https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2016/bills/senate/35
it literally took me 1 minute to find the actual bill
you should be ashamed of yourself
https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2016/bills/senate/35
it literally took me 1 minute to find the actual bill
you should be ashamed of yourself
See post #4 and #11.
This is manufactured outrage from a militant bigot.
No government official will be examining every child that wants to use the bathroom, as the wackjob who contributed to the article claims.
And nowhere in it does it say anything about inspecting all children.
Tim Peacock literally made it up to rally SJW ignorance to his radical cause.
Its what he does for a living.
He gets paid to go around pointing fingers crying racist or homophobe.
He hates Christians, he hates Republicans, he hates Conservatives, he hates anybody who disagrees with him.
So he fabricates shit to make them sound bad.
Hes a disgusting regressive puke.
MAGA
When all you do is WIN WIN WIN
That website is click-bait. I know as it constantly on my news feed. Just because someone proposes some inane bill doesn't mean its newsworthy or even plausible to pass. Like the bill proposed in Arizona that required an rx for birth control. Or the bill proposed in Wisconson which attempted to allow leniency for single parents who commit child-abuse.
Here is the actual bill: http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp...?161+ful+HB663
Do you notice anything missing?
I sure do, any facts supporting this nutjobs claims:
According to LGBTQ rights activist Tim Peacock, “adults would be required to inspect children’s genitals before they use the bathroom.”
“This is what the conservative movement has devolved into,” Peacock wrote in a blog post published Tuesday, “forcing children to allow adults to examine their genitals out of misplaced fear that transgender kids and adults might commit a hypothetical never-before-seen act of violence or sexual aggression (that would still be against the law with or without transgender protections).”
MAGA
When all you do is WIN WIN WIN
They are actually talking about this one:
http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp...?161+ful+HB663
Personally I don't believe, that thing will pass, because it is poorly written, and would indeed need a person who examines the genetalia of a "suspicious" person... which would obviously violate their rights. Not to memntion for exmple, forcing transgenders, who got their legal sex changed to go into the opposite bathroom again.
BTW: Since many F2M don't have a SRS, I doubt women would be feeling great about having such a fully bearded guy, bald walking into their bathroom...
As someone who despises the promotion of mental illnesses. I support this, or well...I wouldn't care either way.
You know, I'm no psychiatrist, but I can tell you the mental illness is actually called gender dysphoria, and one of the medically accepted "cures" is sex reassignment surgery. Now, you can say you disagree with that, but unless you are medically trained and can actually back up your reasons besides "I think it's gross", then your opinion is pretty much irrelevant.
This all is hilarious... Why not just have unisex bathrooms? It is ridiculous that we still have them separated for men and women.
Basically trans has opened Pandora's box in so many ways. I can waltz into a women's bathroom and nobody can stop me in some states now because how dare they question what gender I decide I am at that moment. Then there's fact that we also need to accept people who say they were a fox in a human's body because it is just as crazy as a woman in a man's body.
- - - Updated - - -
It's hilarious how many trans people think that Rachel Dolezal was crazy for saying she was black or how they call transspecies people crazy, but then argue it's psychological not genetic that makes you a man or a woman.
Since most of the discussion is about transgenderism rather than the proposed law, I'm locking this; we don't allow threads on the topic because they lead to too many people breaking the site rules.