Being ignorant is not the same as being wrong, no. It means you're ignoring certain facts and reality in order to perpetuate your argument. Here, it is specifically the fallacy that the Pattern in the books has anything to do with the show, which it does not. Or bringing up real life pregnant women doing extraneous activities as a comparison to the show, which it is not comparable at all. These are arguments of ignorance, because you're drawing comparisons which aren't relative to explaining why the show depicts a woman being able to fight at peak performance while in full labour.
All your efforts in explaining believability are in ignorance to the depictions that exist directly in the show. By all means, you should be saying 'yeah the show is over the top' and leaving it at that. The fact you are trying to explain these events as being believable is ignorant, because you're actively trying to prove it as being believable, rather than regarding that believability is everyone's subjective value.
You aren't wrong because we're ultimately talking about subjective interpretations of fiction. There is no right or wrong in how believable fiction is. You can make an argument that it is believable to you for X and Y reasons. Yet even then, those reasons can be ignorant.
An example: I say I don't like pizza because it tastes burnt. That opinion is not right or wrong, because it's an expression of preference. It can be a true opinion that I don't like pizza, but it is also ignorant because it assumes that all pizza tastes burnt.
Fate is an unchanging, immutable guiding principle to all events and actions.This you? Is the pattern fate, or is it not fate?
The Pattern is also a guiding principle, much like Fate, but it has exceptions to the rules. It guides, yet it is flexible enough to allow the free will of individuals or interject a 'Chosen one' who can actively manipulate that same guiding principle.
The Pattern is not fate.
As for the second statement, you said :
It is also hilarious how much denial you are in that you'll accept a theory that could lead a woman hundreds of miles over years to a specific place. But take issue with her being able to fight and do stuff that keeps her alive until that specific place.
In the context of your statement, you're basically talking about the same principles of fate - a theory that leads a woman hundreds of miles over a year to a specific place. The theory isn't exclusive to the Pattern in the books. That also applies to fate.
And you're comparing to her being able to fight and do stuff that keeps her alive until that specific place. In context, you're not talking about fate, you're talking about choice and action, and implying superhuman feats at that if we're still talking about the show. Those are two contrasting values here.
The Pattern is not fate. The Pattern is not solely responsible for Tigraine's survival actions in the show. They're two different concepts we're talking about. And if we're solely talking about Fate guiding Tigraine to performing super-human actions during labour because it was her fate to do so, then it falls back to my original criticism of this being an unbelievable and unrealistic explanation.
- - - Updated - - -
Not sure why you think I'm conflicted at all.
I just think you have poor reading comprehension skills and took to explaning things in the book that didn't need any explaining. You took a quote from me out of context and felt the need to explain why the books are believable, when I never made any comment about the books lacking believability.
That you're arguing in favour of a Pregnant woman being able to fight is moot, because I never said it was unrealistic for a Pregnant woman to fight. I said it was unrealistic for them to be shown fighting at peak performance while in labour; which we both acknowledge as being over the top. So if you were somehow thinking that I said pregnant women fighting is unrealistic, then you were making assumptions and arguing nothing for the sake of it. Nothing in my statements said a Pregnant woman couldn't fight for her life. All my comments are about her superhuman feats and acrobatics while in active labour is simply not believable. And again, nothing about this was directly implied in the books that she was fighting while in labour.