Republican Election 2016 - Donald Trump Megathread [OFFICIAL]

[Wildtree]

I gave you a site to look at. You refuse. You're refusal to see the truth becomes more apparent.

Acts like the smartest cookie in the shelves, and doesn't know the difference of your and you're.
That fits.. Stereotype confirmed once again.

No hurt feelings. Just fed up with liberal horse shit. Fucking parasitic mentality. It's fucking disgusting.

Needless to say, when argumentation runs thin, the cuss words have to fill in.
It's horseshit btw. here too, another stereotype.. Tries using insults, fails spelling them correctly.
Bad at debating, bad at English. And you say you are/were in the military?
Scary thought..

[Lenonis]

edit -- nevermind. had a misreading moment.

[Darsithis]

Let's get back on track, please

[Reeve]

You're officially lapped the number of times I've seen someone weaponize "I'm in the military!" in MMO-OT. In my experience, the actual military people I know here and IRL NEVER do this.

My bullshit-o-meter is going nuts.

You're thinking Stolen Valour?

[Barnabas]

So according to Hillary Clinton today the people who own guns can't vote. They only kill people. Her paranoia is concerning. Is she going to react the same way to foreign leaders?

[Pangean]

Yet another non-endorsement.

Donald Trump is uniquely unqualified – and these folks would know

THE OBSERVER EDITORIAL BOARD

Don’t take it from Hillary Clinton. Don’t take it from the media. Take it, instead, from 50 leading Republicans who have all worked directly with Republican presidents or their main advisers on national security and foreign policy:

Donald Trump “would be the most reckless President in American history.”

In an unprecedented move, 50 of the nation’s leading Republican foreign policy experts issued a statement Monday denouncing their party’s nominee as singularly unfit for the office. Their language was unconditional, spelling out the many ways Trump would be a dangerous commander in chief.

“In our judgment, Mr. Trump has none of these critical qualities” required of a president, they wrote. “He is unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood. He does not encourage conflicting views. He lacks self-control and acts impetuously. He cannot tolerate personal criticism. He has alarmed our closest allies with his erratic behavior. All of these are dangerous qualities in an individual who aspires to be President and Commander-in-Chief, with command of the U.S. nuclear arsenal.”

Right on cue, Trump acted impetuously, saying at a Wilmington, N.C., rally on Tuesday that “2nd Amendment people” could stop Hillary Clinton from picking judges, which many took as an incitement to violence.

Almost no one is better positioned to know what’s required of a president than the group that issued the statement. It includes former Homeland Security chiefs Michael Chertoff and Tom Ridge; Dick Cheney’s national security advisor, Eric Edelman; former CIA Director Michael Hayden; former Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte; and others who served Republican administrations, from Nixon to Bush 43.

These people are not running for office. They don’t need the limelight. They are not pundits on the sidelines who haven’t been there. These individuals have been in the national-security trenches. They know what’s required of a president, and they have no incentive to criticize Donald Trump other than out of genuine concern for the country.

That so many key players in the Republican national-security establishment feel this way raises the question of who a President Trump would have as foreign policy advisers. It would not be people with a tremendous amount of experience.

It raises another question as well: How does the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman reconcile his embrace of Trump with what these experts have to say? That would be North Carolina’s Richard Burr, who is seeking reelection and who has supported Trump’s campaign.

The signatories to the letter made clear they are not necessarily supporting Clinton. But they know what they think of Trump.

Trump “has demonstrated repeatedly that he has little understanding of America’s vital national interests, its complex diplomatic challenges, its indispensable alliances, and the democratic values on which U.S. foreign policy must be based,” they write.

We understand why people are frustrated with government, and the appeal of an outsider. But this letter is a different animal than the typical back-and-forth of politics, and should make voters consider if this is really the outsider they want.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/opi...#storylink=cpy

- - - Updated - - -

So according to Hillary Clinton today the people who own guns can't vote only kill people. Her paranoia is concerning. Is she going to react the same way to foreign leaders?

Yeah take this to the Clinton thread.

[Healing Rain]

When Crooked Hillary says that she'd put coal workers out of work and attempt to chain them to the government and says that she'd put criminal invaders ahead of US citizens you don't hear a peep out of the "news" media. When Donald Trump calls upon Constitutionalists to unite behind him what he says is misinterpreted by the "news" media.

[PC2]

Good golly good gosh anonymous people on the internet disagree with my opinions!

I don't know how I'll sleep tonight.

Time to build a dynamic guard robot against those legion of losers.

[Bollocks]

You can probably argue that "Democracy export" is liberal value - spreading liberty and all! ...that certainly killed hundreds of thousands.

You could but that seems like a stretch

[Vivapin8]

Don't think so. He is just saying you need to go to another forum to see what people say about you.

So i went and checked that forum, so many stereotypes it´s impressive:

"well at least well have a list of names to work off of when we start Firing up the Trump FEMA train. Hmm how does a camp slogan of "Work will set you free" sound?"

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/189...rs_Insane.html

[Breccia]

Politifact is already on the "Second Amendment" thing. You'll note in the very same paragraph, he adds three more lies about Clinton, and the article also has a Trump senior communication translator advisor spinning the comment.

- - - Updated - - -

So according to Hillary Clinton today the people who own guns can't vote. They only kill people. Her paranoia is concerning. Is she going to react the same way to foreign leaders?

You want to link this? Because without a link, I'm just going to say "no she didn't".

[Deja Thoris]

Yeah, whatever. Go to AR15.com, go to general discussions, and see what other military people are saying about you. My names Jinxsters on there. In order to have a tank you have to prove by showing your DD214. I have a tank next to my name dipshit. I just come on here to see what my enemies are thinking/saying.

You certainly make the forums more entertaining. I have to agree though, I'm not sure how people can't believe you, I mean a tank next to your name and all. Maybe put a blanky round your shoulders and call it a cape and name yourself superman while you're at it.

I have "I am murloc next to my name! mgrlllmgrlrrr"

On topic, dat Trump huh? Says some crazy stuff!

[Blur4stuff]

try making a death threat towards a president or candidate and see what happens to you

same thing should happen to Trump

[Orbitus]

Violence is wrong but authoritarianism and diminishing citizens rights is wrong too.

What rights are being taken away? If Hillary gets in office, NONE. But if Trump gets in office, he would appoint fascist judges that will repeal Roe V Wade and get rid of gay marriage. If you are saying that Hillary will "abolish the 2nd amendment" like Trump says, then you are fucking gullible and deserve to have your right to vote taken away.

[Celista]

When Crooked Hillary says that she'd put coal workers out of work and attempt to chain them to the government and says that she'd put criminal invaders ahead of US citizens you don't hear a peep out of the "news" media. When Donald Trump calls upon Constitutionalists to unite behind him what he says is misinterpreted by the "news" media.

You sound like you swallow literally everything Trump has to say.

That being said, I'm confused at to why some on the Right are so concerned about coal and manufacturing jobs. Coal is a dirty energy source and the work is still, to this day, quite hazardous. We are moving forward as a country and jobs are forming in new industries. Most business people will tell you that it is not in our interest to keep these jobs here; the US simply can't compete with cheap labor abroad.

What we should be advocating for are job training programs for a displaced workforce.

[Breccia]

try making a death threat towards a president or candidate and see what happens to you

same thing should happen to Trump

The Secret Service has actually released a statement (being "stop telling us, we know goddammit we're the Secret Service")

That's enough. Now he's under even MORE federal investigations.

(tho I'm fairly sure this one will go away pretty quickly)

[Orbitus]

Supporter? It's just hilarious how your media paints him.

Will be even more fun when he actually wins. Will probably beat Brexit tears of "Remainers".

This latest remark "If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks... Although, Second Amendment, people, maybe there is, i don't know..." being painted as "OMG, Trump told to shoot Clinton and her judges!!! OMG!!!" ... really? Is that really what you hear? Second amendment being mentioned means you have to shoot everyone?

I am sorry you didn't get his meaning of telling gun owners to assassinate Hillary. But then again, what do you expect from a Putin apologist.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes ideas like the first and second amendment are worth far more than safety. Living in a free society with hundreds of millions of people means that occasionally a small amount of people get hurt.

Funny, Trump wants to limit the First amendment, I don't see you whining like a little child about that.

[Lenonis]

I have an observation -- both about Trump's campaign as well as the MMO-C posters here.

There is a lot of talk about how the PC movement has gone out of control and we're a nation of crybabies who can't handle adversity. Blah blah safe spaces blah blah.

And yet...it seems the second they get any criticism they immediate jump to a persecution complex mentality. Isn't that the very thing they are complaining about?

Trump claims it's unfair media twisted what he says. Shouldn't the conservative response be that he needs to grow a thicker skin and own his words? Personal responsibility and all that?

And the people defending him....at worst he dog whistled for someone to shoot Clinton. At best he chose his words really poorly --- after all it's not like this mistake wasn't made before.

Given that Trump has claimed he has "all the best words" why isn't anyone just up and stating that he screwed up? You don't even hint at "second amendment solutions" in this political era. That's a known no-no.

[PC2]

What rights are being taken away?

I specifically didn't say that. I said she wants a hoop jumping circuit that amounts to coercion against gun ownership via bureaucracy.

But if Trump gets in office, he would appoint fascist judges that will repeal Roe V Wade and get rid of gay marriage. If you are saying that Hillary will "abolish the 2nd amendment" like Trump says, then you are fucking gullible and deserve to have your right to vote taken away.

Yes Trump also has some authoritarian ideas such as banning gay marriage. I see no problem with calling out authoritarian ideas where ever they come from.

[Orbitus]

I am a fierce protector of free expression. Yet if someone directly and specifically used speech violently, they should be put on trial.

So you are saying that Trump should be put on trial then? Good to know. Considering he has advocated for assaulting people and his supporters have. Then he said he wants to expand libel laws so he can sue people easier, even if they are correct.