A brainfart is doing stupid, your brain not working properly for (insert reason). I think this perfectly qualifies no? Seeing as- - - Updated - - -Most any developed society with standard morals know from a very young age that people touching you is bad
Stop talking if you do not know what you are talking about.
If you're going to the extreme of what a brain fart is, than yes you can straw man it out to any spectrum and any age. In reality though, you don't simply grope someone at that age without consciously knowing it isn't right. Or worse, you think it is fine and that develops into even something worse as you get older. Either situation is terrible, and much more likely than the very low chance of being oblivious to your own actions.
Stop treating a 15 year old like a child, unless you somehow consider anyone under 18 arbitrarily a child.
No, the brain is developing for a long time well into the 20s, why should someone there be sentenced like someone that is 30 then according to you?
If brain development is the main reason for it then people who are in their 20s should be considered less culpable too when they commit crime but they get full penalties
Seeing what feminism have done to society here in the west makes me regret not taking all the drunk girls that did grop my big but all the time when i was drunk to court i could have made a living out of it.
and the times girls were pushing for sex when i was not in mood.
Do as you may, dismiss others and keep typing like all you want to do is hear yourself type / talk. It gets your point across to literally no one else but yourself. A 15 year old is definitely going to be under developed, just like how an 18 year old is not fully developed. You also seem to think that those 3 years are going to whimsically going to teach someone at that age their actions are somehow infinitely worse.
A 15 year old knows very well the concept of consent, personal space, and touching someone, and whether they choose to ignore it or not is their choice.
yes there are a lot of facts.
children are different is a fact, but the way we treat them because of that in a criminal context is a multiple choice question that the answer to varies across the world.
perhaps more importantly, the definition of child end at different ages in different places, and i'm sure each place has science to back them up as to why 14, 16, 18, 21, 30, 65 etc is the proper age for this or that.
in the end we choose, science is just one of the things to base your decisions on, and it is almost never the only thing.
Last edited by mmoc982b0e8df8; 2016-07-28 at 10:35 AM.
They don't have sexual assault in Canada.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
I was taught no means yes.