How typical of Congress. They created the problem with Big Pharm by giving them ridiculous terms on patent laws. They legit think that the issue is that the companies are greedy, not that congress created a system where gaming the patent system is viable like this. If only there was a way we could change laws...
You say "he states facts.", but did you verify these facts? Have you seen independent reports/audits to verify them? Or are you calling them "facts" because he stated they were facts or simply stated things and are confusing "statements" with "facts"?
I ask because it is very easy for me to say, "This is a fact: ...." before something that will help justify something after I do something horrible, like Martin Shkreli did with the drug company he bought. If I were in the news and looked at as a despicable human being for doing something and someone came along and did something very similar, though maybe on a slightly smaller scale, you bet your ass I would be out there claiming that what they did was totally justifiable and stating "here are some facts ..." that no one will verify, hoping that if people buy those facts, maybe they will then turn around and be like, "Well, if those are the facts ... then maybe what he did wasn't so bad after all?".
r.i.p. alleria. 1997-2017. blizzard ruined alleria forever. blizz assassinated alleria's character and appearance.
i will never forgive you for this blizzard.
I mean if it were going to work he same way where the manufacturer gives me an instant rebate for half the price and my auto insurance picked up the other half, sure I'd take a free car.
0 dollars paid means 0 dollars paid. As in you walk into the pharmacy and we go here have your free Epipen.
This is really why we need health care reform. We'll see more finger-pointing between practitioners, insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies until that point, because many people are willing to buy into the bullshit...all they see is "coupon" "deeply discounted" and "free", when nothing (especially in health care) is really free.
Even if you're not getting a $600 bill in the mail for your EpiPen, you'll be paying for it one way or another.
I do.
To think otherwise would be saying that insurance companies pay full price for drugs. They don't. That's why they have an approved list. The markup is just the cost if you didn't have insurance or had to pay out of pocket. Which few actually do.
They could mark up their price to 5,000,000 per pen and it would amount to the same. Insurance pays like $50 per and charge you a copayment depending on your agreement.
Reading this makes me happy I live in a country with free healthcare.
I'd rather pay 20% more taxes and get free healthcare than losing my life savings and get permanently broke if I get sick.
exactly, this just feeds the system. Cost is put on to the insurance company. Insurance company raises their premiums to cover extra cost of medicine.
Remember, as Skreli mentioned, Mylan is a generic company. They don't really do new research and development. This is just a pure money grab to raise the cost of a medicine that's essentially mandatory and needs to be swapped out once per year whether they are used or not. And all it does is go straight into the pocket of of the employees, executive and ceo. Remember, she now makes $19million per year....
If only Democrats had focused on passing laws to protect consumers instead of passing laws to pay for shitty health insurance that still makes it too expensive.
Health Care does not behave like other services or products in a market. There is an entire branch of economics dedicated to the way healthcare delivery behaves economically. Its called Health Care Economics.
What you are looking at here is the effects of one of the ways it differs from most things, price elasticity. Price elasticity is a term for how much of an ability the customer has to refuse to purchase a product if the price is too high. In the case of potentially lifesaving products, that ability is effectively zero. Hence, the price borders on ruinous.
I am sorry but this is just pure balderdash. Most developed nations taxpayers pay less in taxes for government health care than Americans. Odds are, if your country ran healthcare like America does, you'd be paying more in taxes for healthcare. And you would receive no healthcare.
Americans pay per citizen more for government healthcare that covers 28 % of the population than other developed nations pay to cover 100 %.
If the insurance company paid 600 dollars for it I might agree with you, but they don't 600 is the AWP. It's like MSRP on a car. Nobody pays that. The insurance company probably pays around $200 for it if that and that's being generous. That's because they negotiate a contract with the manufacturers on behalf of their customers.
Keep talking like you know what's going on please.