I didn't realise it was possible to be that scared of The Gays.
I didn't realise it was possible to be that scared of The Gays.
What do you mean? Just being near a "the gays" makes you one of the "the gays" and being "the gays" is the worst thing ever because something something icky, gross, its totally my business what you do in your bedroom with another adult, etc etc.
*mods please understand this is sarcasm*
In a country where people walk around armed to the teeth, I wonder how the social unrest will unfold in the coming centuries.
In Europe it wouldnt come off the ground, but in the US? Might as well turn into another civil war at some point.
Blood has already been shed to protect that guy's values. Remember when gay men used to get beaten to death when they were caught out at night?
Why is there so much talk about gays? He didnt bring it up once. I reckon a lot of left wing tards on here are superimposing their version of what he said over the reality of what he said. So just another day in SJW land. Logic fails so resort to emotionalism
There is the sad paradox of a world which is more and more sensitive about being politically correct, almost to the point of ridicule, yet does not wish to acknowledge or to respect believers’ faith in God
Let's be fair; we're commenting on a speech that borders on encouraging Americans to kill one another over ideological differences. The governor of Kentucky is warning people that they might need to murder their countrymen if Hillary Clinton wins the election. The topic is a radical appeal to emotion in itself, designed to illicit fearful response at best, and hatred and sedition at worst.
I like how he tries to say the Revolutionaries just up and decided one day to kill them some Redcoats. The Founding Fathers tried literally everything they could prior, and even then they only voted to secede from Britain by a fairly narrow margin (after much discourse and even a few fistfights). They wrote official complaints to Parliament, protested, resisted without violence, threw British goods into the harbor so they wouldn't have to pay for it, and remained in constant contact (as much as was possible) with Parliament up until they decided to revolt. It's not like they just started gunning down British soldiers out of the blue one day after the Crown sent some new Magistrate they didn't like.
And anyone who thinks the situation the colonies faced under British Rule can be compared to the situation today simply because the other party has the upper hand at high levels of government needs to crawl out of their bunker every now and then.
Be seeing you guys on Bloodsail Buccaneers NA!
There is the sad paradox of a world which is more and more sensitive about being politically correct, almost to the point of ridicule, yet does not wish to acknowledge or to respect believers’ faith in God
Only among those ignorant of Supreme Court precedent directly on point, Brandenburg v. Ohio. Speech must create the risk of imminent lawless action and reasonably likely to result in that action. Example being, standing in front of angry group of protestors, pointing to the city council member they are protesting who has just stepped out on the street, and screaming "string him up!" -- not protected speech. Saying at a speech that at some future date and under some uncertain future conditions, that armed revolution may be necessary... that is not only protected speech, that is protected political speech that goes right to the core of why the 1st Amendment is there in the first place.
OK, if you want to put him on trial he'd likely win. Congrats. That doesn't make what he said any less reckless. Let's not forget Donald Trumps vague comment about the second amendment folks stopping Hilary or the thwarted terrorist attacks against a muslim-somali community in Kentucky. There is potential for these words to produce senseless violence regardless of whether it's imminent or post election.
His speech is perfectly protected under the 1st amendment but that doesn't mean it has any place being said by a politician. There is only a fringe minority who thinks a revolution will solve anything aside from getting the Clive Bundys of this world locked up where they belong.