Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ...
4
5
6
  1. #101
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    You really think civilian small arms ownership presents a meaningful defense against the US Government turned tyrannical?
    Yes. When people talk about open war, I think they're being silly, but I think the threat of an armed populace engaging in small-scale warfare against a sufficiently unjust set of government officials is a non-trivial benefit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Shouldn't we then include the risk of arming people who might be party to tyranny? Historically there's a strong basis for that danger.
    Maybe. As above, I think an armed populace is capable of having a non-trivial impact, but I greatly doubt it would be capable of pulling an actual coup, at least not without having gained substantial military influence.

    Frankly, I wouldn't defend any of these propositions particularly strongly. The primary motivator is simply that free people have an important historical right to arm themselves. This is true both in the Lockeian sense and in a much more ancient sense. I place great value on this right.

  2. #102
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Murderdoll View Post
    Considering that most of the weapons would be black market and the fact that they're committing crimes by having the gun and then shooting and potentially killing someone, what would more gun control solve in keeping CRIMINALS from committing crimes?
    The same thing it does in Europe. If there is no legal gun market then petty criminals won't have guns. They will be far rarer and more expensive.

    You realize there are hundreds of millions of legal guns in the US... If even .01% of them are lost, stolen, illegally sold/resold/traded, etc... That's millions of guns.

  3. #103
    Quote Originally Posted by Kontinuum View Post
    St. Louis and Detroit are much worse with their homicide rates
    http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/m...the-world.html
    Isn't it strange that the US cities that made that list have been controlled by the Democratic Party for quite a long time?

  4. #104
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    Isn't it strange that the US cities that made that list have been controlled by the Democratic Party for quite a long time?
    Most major cities across the globe trend liberal for their nation.

  5. #105
    Normally I stop by these threads to roll my eyes about people not from Chicago talking about the violence here. But all those graphs accurately tell you where and who is doing the killing. Have fun analyzing my city

  6. #106
    Quote Originally Posted by Garnier Fructis View Post
    Stats from a single year are useless on their own.

    There's legitimately something wrong since the number of murders have jumped sharply to a level that hasn't been seen for almost 2 decades in Chicago, which had seen a downward trend in killings and violent crime. It's a pretty large spike that is much larger than any of the random deviations before.

    If you were looking for any sort of objectivity here, that would be a better starting point.
    There's also a secondary thought that you completely missed. That the crime from previous years was somehow less reported or underreported, misreported, etc... Or to use the phrase juking the system.

    Thus it's entirely possible that this might be the 1st year that we have an actual real statistic of an actual representation of crime in Chicago. However, and it's also entirely possible that this is the mislabeled and unreported number as well, making the problem even worse.

    Personally the biggest statistics that jump out at me are the number of unsolved or "no suspect charged" and the minimalistic number of police shootings by comparison. Though it's no secret that Chicago's issue is gang v gang violence and the majority of those deaths are gang related.

    Thus solve the gang problem and you solve the shooting problem.

    Also, outside thought: Since the high probability of gang v gang is the cause of the increased deaths, was there a causal issue that started a specific gang war? Or maybe a specific gang that is more violent than the others?

  7. #107
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    The same thing it does in Europe. If there is no legal gun market then petty criminals won't have guns. They will be far rarer and more expensive.

    You realize there are hundreds of millions of legal guns in the US... If even .01% of them are lost, stolen, illegally sold/resold/traded, etc... That's millions of guns.
    Except Europe, despite the stricter rules, has similar problems in areas with high diversity.

    Maybe the problem is in another set of numbers.

  8. #108
    Quote Originally Posted by LeRoy View Post
    Except Europe, despite the stricter rules, has similar problems in areas with high diversity.

    Maybe the problem is in another set of numbers.
    No they don't. They simply don't. Not even close.

    No city in Europe comes even close to the number of murders in an average US city.
    Quote Originally Posted by Redtower View Post
    I don't think I ever hide the fact I was a national socialist. The fact I am a German one is what technically makes me a nazi
    Quote Originally Posted by Hooked View Post
    You haven't seen nothing yet, we trumpsters will definitely be getting some cool uniforms soon I hope.

  9. #109
    Quote Originally Posted by LeRoy View Post
    Except Europe, despite the stricter rules, has similar problems in areas with high diversity.

    Maybe the problem is in another set of numbers.
    It's an interesting premise, but a statement like that really needs to be backed up with actual fact or statistics.

  10. #110
    Herald of the Titans Murderdoll's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,750
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    The same thing it does in Europe. If there is no legal gun market then petty criminals won't have guns. They will be far rarer and more expensive.

    You realize there are hundreds of millions of legal guns in the US... If even .01% of them are lost, stolen, illegally sold/resold/traded, etc... That's millions of guns.
    I do entirely realise that.

    However, there will always be an illegal gun market, even if guns are restricted to the extent that guns in Australia are restricted.

    You know where our black market guns come from? Stolen from police/imported.

    Have a guess where your guns will come from? You have land borders with Canada and Mexico.

    You will also rely on criminals, handing in their guns if there is an amnesty. Again, using Australia as an example. That wont happen.

    At the end of the day, you still have criminals committing crimes with illegal weapons.

  11. #111
    CHICAGO ENDS BLOODY YEAR WITH 762 HOMICIDES...

    They're just showing off now.
    .

    "This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."

    -- Capt. Copeland

  12. #112
    To back up my premise that the Chicago's crime rates have fallen off in recent years is complete bullshit:

    http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Ma...o-crime-rates/

    also:

    https://www.amazon.com/Crime-Numbers...e+numbers+game

    basically a book describing how cities have begun juking the numbers to make the crime statistics decrease.


    Chicago's numbers haven't realistically been dropping in recent years. Hopefully this is a year where they actually reported true statistics, because if not, it makes this year particularly disturbing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •