And that is the thing. He is trying to scare his own party, but they also know if they pass this bill and make their constituents angry the rest of the stupid shit they try to do won't make up for it. They will lose their seats in 4 years and it'll all get undone.
I honestly don't know if he will manage to push it through as is, because the problem is he has people on opposite sides trying to pull it their direction.
I don't think it will be like broadband because there aren't as substantial infrastructure costs. To sell telecom you first need to make a significant investment in infrastructure that you may never recoup if you don't get enough customers/revenue. Selling insurance has a lot less base costs which makes it a lot easier to expand into markets. Ultimately the premiums for sick states will rise and lower for healthy states. The people who are needing health care will be paying for it instead of the people who don't need it. Access is a hollow talking point, the only things that have or will ever matter is a) how much healthcare will cost and b) who will pay for it. While runaway costs are an issue which need to be addressed, I also believe that people over 35 should pay for their own shit.
last time i checked you won't die if you don't have internet. also what about people over 35 who lose their life savings for one reason or another and can't afford it? should they just not have healthcare? you ever watch one of those shows where they show victims of ponzi schemes and a good chunk of them are people in their 50's and 60's who worked all their life and got conned? but fuck them they don't need health care they should just die because a criminal managed to convince an aging old middle aged person with lies and fancy fake spreadsheets.
i would say it's because you don't understand or don't care that shit happens in life but i'm sensing it's that you just don't care. if history has taught us anything it's that having a sick and dying population is bad for your economy.
Last edited by breadisfunny; 2017-03-11 at 07:40 PM.
r.i.p. alleria. 1997-2017. blizzard ruined alleria forever. blizz assassinated alleria's character and appearance.
i will never forgive you for this blizzard.
r.i.p. alleria. 1997-2017. blizzard ruined alleria forever. blizz assassinated alleria's character and appearance.
i will never forgive you for this blizzard.
Have you ever seen what it takes to expand into a new market, state for an insurance company? I have. Been there done that in a few states, markets.
First off you need to file for the right to sell insurance and get a licence. Just like a lot of telecoms have to.
Second you need to build a network. They have to go out and contract with every doctor and hospital they can get their hands on that has some kind of quality. Do you realize in a state as small as Connecticut you still have to negotiate with 68 hospitals, build a contract, analyze data, etc etc
Sometimes this process can take 12-24 months before you have enough coverage to even start to sell a product people will buy.
Third you have to build a sales team and actually sell the product. Advertising, negotiation, bidding, meeting, etc etc etc.
Fourth you have to maintain the network. This includes having a lot of provider relations staff, contract staff, negotiators, analyst, doctor audits, doctor credentialing, hospital audits, etc etc
They have substantial cost. not physical infrastructure cost like broadband, but significant investments to enter a new market to eek out a 3-5% profit margin. This is why Health Insurance companies might operate in the vast majority of states, but they do not operate in the vast majority of MARKETS inside that state.
https://biz.yahoo.com/p/522conameu.html
Profit margins = 3.2% average.
Hard to tell for broadband since they are almost all owned by conglomerate media companies and they don't break it out... but you are looking at 10%, 13%, 9%, 11% & 12% for the big 5.
- - - Updated - - -
Our normal band of merry Trumpsters are basically silent except a snipe here a snipe there.
if anything they revert to ....well Obamacare needs to get replaced so this is a good start.....even though its a horrible start
- - - Updated - - -
i just made a post on The_Donald. my first. lets see how long it last
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/...ont_look_good/
First Analysis of GOP Healthplan don't Look good. Plan not supporting Trumps Goals! (self.The_Donald)
submitted a minute ago by PeterNess1
I think Trump should really be pushing this tool Ryan for a better plan to meet all the ideals that Trump stands for.
We estimate that the bill would increase costs for the average enrollee by $1,542, for the year, if the bill were in effect today. In 2020, the bill would increase costs for the average enrollee by $2,409.
For families, the Republican bill would increase costs by $2,243 if the bill were in effect today. For families with a head of household age 55 to 64, the bill would increase costs by $7,604.
AARP also released numbers that are in the same ballpark.
(like my name PeterNess...short for P.Ness) :P
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Because the GOP establishment comes first and Paul Ryan is a part of it. He is financed by pharmaceutical companies as many Republicans are. People who voted for Trump weren't voting for GOP Republicans (A lot of the incumbents will probably be gone in elections regardless). The thing about both sides is they never seem to care about the people at all. A lot of people seem to miss this point. If Trump signs this legislation he basically signs away his presidency.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
Did someone saw that Paul Ryan video in which he justifies Trumpcare?
Policy wonk my ass.
To be clear he said that if the ahca doesnt pass its not likely the tax reform in the future will pass either, actually i think he was arguing this about their entire legislatifr agenda iirc. He was on tucker carlsons and basically said we're doing these tax cuts now because we have bigger ones coming later and dont eant to jam it all in at once.