I brought up pronouns because of your BS context usage and clearly neither do you.
Only for someone who doesn't understand the difference between a formal and casual conversation.Yes, there is. And in fact, again, this statement, "Entrapment only applies if they force someone to do something they wouldn't have done on their own", literally means it's only entrapment if they're coerced or have no choice. No rational person can read that any other way.
So not only do you fail to actually read my posts, you fail to pay attention to your own. Good to know.Aside from "fact" not being a valid term here and that while you keep saying this, it has no actual relevance to anything, no one is "holding you responsible" for anything. This is some weird conspiracy theory shit or something.
Literally, you still have a choice. A bad choice is still a choice. So care to give anymore proof you are being a hypocrite ... I am really trying to hold you to your own standards, but you keep changing them to suite your argument.We've gone over this. Not having an acceptable choice is a lack of choice. If your options are handing over your wallet or taking a bullet, in any legitimate context, you have no choice.
Actually, at this point, I am more interested in your hypocrisy than pedantry at this point.It's a bit ironic you keep saying that when you're still calling the clarification of an ambiguous statement that very few, if any, people would actually read as you claim you intended it, "pedantry".