^This!
We got to see two full dungeon runs, and there's walkthroughs of two of the starter zones. Over 2 hours of gameplay without fiddling with keybinds and such to see what the new areas and enemies look like and such.
I loved it! Took the weekend off to spend it with my hubby, lounging in bed with snacks while watching videos.
When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like injustice.
Drustvar and Nazmir seemed very finished, a lot farther along then any legion zones at this point.
I don't like watching streamers, too many times they just ignores what's more important (just want likes/follow/suscribe), they don't see things that are right in front of their eyes and yes, they spend 1 hour with their keybinds. To resume : boring
Don't be dense. The last 10 posts were about the controversy regarding certain people gaining early access to alpha/beta and how they would fail to do what some/most people here prefer they do. Don't get high and mighty by summarising the thread for me.
Once again, I don't give a flying fuck about whether that information was worthwhile in general, from my PoV it just isn't relevant to the topic that spawned the response in the first place. Don't go parading me as a 'gatekeeper'.
And when I formulate "The main ... being a tester.", I certainly don't care for you lecturing me on 'prefacing', which is just an extent of your nitpicking.
While true, they'd likely get more of them if they didn't as much time asking for them or just talking or whatever and actually completing the content and doing the thing people are even tuning into them for.
A stream with the title "Battle for Azeroth, Blizzcon 2017, Gameplay video" isn't going to get that many likes (I'd assume, because I sure as hell wouldn't give them any) if they spent 2/3 of their time just talking about, and actually just doing keybinds, all the while asking for likes and subscribers.
Unless you can support this argument with any data, it's pure speculation. Streaming is much more just the game itself, some streamers are awful at games yet they peak purely because of personality, others are on the other hand pros and yet they dont go over 2k viewers, and so on.
Crimea is Ukraine!
In fact, there is just one streamer I'd liked to watch is Qelric, but she does not play wow anymore
I personally don't even understand the appeal of streamers/ watching someone stream a game, so I'll admit I'm speaking from a purely speculative stand point.
I'll also admit though that a person with a good personality is likely to draw views and likes and whatnot...maybe that's why people watch them to begin with, not necessarily for the content they're streaming but just to watch them and listen to them just talk about the subject matter....like video game talk radio.
However, based on comments and stories that have come out lately, it seems a fair amount of top streamers who are terrible at games and have a nice "personality" and get top views are scantily clad females that use flattering camera angles. Not suggesting they're the only ones who get that, but it's happened enough to have had several stories written about it, and even Twitch's rules be updated/ more heavily enforced as a result.
Last edited by Katchii; 2018-01-02 at 06:53 PM.
Imagine commenting about 'obvious knowledge' and still somehow miss the key points shared. Generating publicity by providing access to popular streamers does not harm the primary functions of an alpha/beta. It can only help. We already established that bug reports are not in any way as useful as many think they are, and their mere presence helps stress test. Couple that with their role as thought leaders and they may very well encourage others to eventually seek access to get involved, if that access is made available, thus fulfilling the goal of stress testing.
Honestly, it's like you didn't even read the posts you're claiming were common knowledge
Last edited by Lemondish; 2018-01-02 at 09:21 PM.