With the new Velen/Illidan cinematic having come out, everyone is of the notion that Illidan his statements were justified towards Velen.
Which is just a wrong. Even Chronicles: Vol.I has Illidan stealing the Demon Soul from Malfurion, leading to Azshara making a portal large enough for Sargeras to come through (And yes, I know that people don't like Knaaks work, but the overall story is still canon). This has never been retconned, except that with recent retcons he might have stolen it with good intentions instead of power. But that still means that his actions nearly destroyed Azeroth.
And why would Velen not even mention that Illidan sacrificed tons of Broken Draenei their souls, making him no better than Sargeras?
I'm just confused by all the retcons and Illidan his character atm. It's very frustrating reading people praise Illidan now, when according to the lore he is more a villain than an Anti-hero even. With knowing his pre-retconned lore, it makes it very hard to even accept him as a "hero" let stand be ok with him talking bullshit because Blizzard has a hard on for him at this moment.
Anyone else having a hard time with all the Illidan crap being shoved down your throat while being presented as kaviar?
And anyone want to give the canon lore of illidan (both the good and bad things he did).