Mega-Thread: Trump Focused Discussion

[Rokom]

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/s...423255553?s=19

What is he speaking about? Two takes: 1) Trump read some report on the environmental impact of flushing, which we know is not true or 2) he is speaking from personal experience and believes this is what we all do.

3) He's been watching a bit too much King of the Hill

[Poopymonster]

Ok, so now you just made me envision how large Trump's dumps must be. Thanks for that.

Given how greasy his diet seems to be, his butthole should be like the oil slick weapon from Spy Hunter.
Although medications might cause some constipation or make butt mud even worse.
Only the modified back scratcher with toilet paper on the end to reach his dirty bunghole knows for sure.

[omerome]

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/s...423255553?s=19

What is he speaking about? Two takes: 1) Trump read some report on the environmental impact of flushing, which we know is not true or 2) he is speaking from personal experience and believes this is what we all do.

Wouldn't be a shitshow thread without the resident sharing his toilet stories.

[Twdft]

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/s...423255553?s=19

What is he speaking about? Two takes: 1) Trump read some report on the environmental impact of flushing, which we know is not true or 2) he is speaking from personal experience and believes this is what we all do.

Looks to me like he wants to roll back water conservation regulations, which cause less water to flow if you flush your toilet so people flush more often.

He probably watched the great American philosoph Al Bundy:

[Captain N]

Looks to me like he wants to roll back water conservation regulations, which cause less water to flow if you flush your toilet so people flush more often.

I wonder how he plans to pull this off. Toilets have already been changed from a 3.5 gallon tank to the 1.6 gallon tank that is commonly used now. Any plumber worth their pipe wrenches will tell you that if you still have that 3.5 gallon toilet you hang onto it as long as you can. If Trump is trying to push for less than 1.6 gallons per flush that's going to be a major problem for your average American.

[Edge-]

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/s...423255553?s=19

What is he speaking about? Two takes: 1) Trump read some report on the environmental impact of flushing, which we know is not true or 2) he is speaking from personal experience and believes this is what we all do.

Why is the EPA looking into issues relating to water pressure? I'm not sure what department that would specifically fall under, but the EPA only handle contaminants in the water/water quality.

3) He's been watching a bit too much King of the Hill

I'm so glad that I wasn't the only person that instantly thought of that.

[Templar 331]

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/s...423255553?s=19

What is he speaking about? Two takes: 1) Trump read some report on the environmental impact of flushing, which we know is not true or 2) he is speaking from personal experience and believes this is what we all do.

Who ever is giving him a shovel, STOP! I'm tired of seeing rock bottom going deeper!

I swear I think they just give him make believe problems just to keep him from screwing up real shit.

[Levelfive]

Why is the EPA looking into issues relating to water pressure? I'm not sure what department that would specifically fall under, but the EPA only handle contaminants in the water/water quality.

Because as we all know "we have a situation where we're looking very strongly at sinks, and showers, and other elements of bathrooms."

Because sure. President of the US, everyone. You're welcome.

[Edge-]

Because as we all know "we have a situation where we're looking very strongly at sinks, and showers, and other elements of bathrooms."

Because sure. President of the US, everyone. You're welcome.

But is he looking into bidet's?

We need journalists to ask the hard hitting questions.

[Kujako]

I'm tired of seeing rock bottom going deeper!

[Ghostpanther]

Meanwhile....https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/06/us-n...mber-2019.html

Nonfarm payrolls surged by 266,000 in November, better than the 187,000 expected by economists polled by Dow Jones.
The unemployment rate ticked down to 3.5% from 3.6%, back to the 2019 low and matching the lowest jobless rate since 1969.
The end of the GM strike had a big effect, boosting employment in motor vehicles and parts by 41,300, part of an overall 54,000 gain in manufacturing.
Average hourly earnings rose by 3.1% from a year ago, slightly above the 3% expected by economists polled by Dow Jones.

[Orbitus]

Meanwhile....https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/06/us-n...mber-2019.html

Nonfarm payrolls surged by 266,000 in November, better than the 187,000 expected by economists polled by Dow Jones.
The unemployment rate ticked down to 3.5% from 3.6%, back to the 2019 low and matching the lowest jobless rate since 1969.
The end of the GM strike had a big effect, boosting employment in motor vehicles and parts by 41,300, part of an overall 54,000 gain in manufacturing.
Average hourly earnings rose by 3.1% from a year ago, slightly above the 3% expected by economists polled by Dow Jones.

Bets on when this number gets reduced down again? Because they were wrong?

[Stormspellz]

Meanwhile....https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/06/us-n...mber-2019.html

Nonfarm payrolls surged by 266,000 in November, better than the 187,000 expected by economists polled by Dow Jones.
The unemployment rate ticked down to 3.5% from 3.6%, back to the 2019 low and matching the lowest jobless rate since 1969.
The end of the GM strike had a big effect, boosting employment in motor vehicles and parts by 41,300, part of an overall 54,000 gain in manufacturing.
Average hourly earnings rose by 3.1% from a year ago, slightly above the 3% expected by economists polled by Dow Jones.

thanks Obama!

still waiting for even half of the "benifits" trump and the republicans promised for the tax give away to the rich.

[Levelfive]

Bets on when this number gets reduced down again? Because they were wrong?

Maybe he can get the trains to run on time, too.

[Captain N]

Maybe he can get the trains to run on time, too.

Not when hedge fund managers are running your nation's railroads.

[Orbitus]

Not when hedge fund managers are running your nation's railroads.

So, someone else that is unqualified for their position? Color me shocked. Kinda like the judge that just got a lifetime appointment, that has never tried a case as a judge OR a lawyer, in either civil or criminal cases, that the American Bar Association deemed unqualified to even hold a judgeship. She was just a clerk for Kavanaugh, that is why she got the nomination.

[Shadowferal]

hedge fund managers...fucking useless job...

[Bakis]

Don't worry of the last 10 million that got a cancer diagnos only 42% had to spend all their assets to afford treatment.
Whats better than a cardboard box as a house but keeping cancer at bay.

[Breccia]

thanks Obama!

Yeah, the jobs report loses a lot when you realize I had already posted hours earlier that one good month does not a good year make. 2019 is behind every year of Obama's second term, and also, every year of Trump's first. And experts say it'll be revised down.

[Xarkan]

Don't worry of the last 10 million that got a cancer diagnos only 42% had to spend all their assets to afford treatment.
Whats better than a cardboard box as a house but keeping cancer at bay.

So you are saying that 42% have increased odds to not die of cancer in the future [since they have increased chance to die before they get cancer again]