So a new study, shown here in the NYTimes, explains why the coronavirus is a big deal in this thread.
At first, most diseases grow exponentially. You can cut the rate down by how quickly it leaps from host to host. See also: social distancing.
The first known federal social distancing guidelines and similar suggestions were issued March 16, roughly the middle of the DOW's multi-thousand free fall.
The study says, moving that up by a single week would have prevented sixty percent of first wave deaths. (Incidentally, NY had issued a state of emergency March 7)
Two weeks earlier, it would have stopped ninety percent. And yes, that would have been a hard sell. NY hadn't even gotten its second case yet.
The study doesn't talk about second-wave deaths, but stopping social distancing during the first wave means the second wave is largely irrelevant. There are now 40,000 deaths. Sixty percent would be 24,000. Trump, who brags about unproven hypotheticals that can see Strawmen from their bedroom windows, has been shown by this study to have cost 24,000 American lives, so far, because of his inaction.
This is about double the number who died in a year to H1N1 that he blamed Biden for.
"But Breccia! Surely you can't blame Trump for using hypotheticals, and yet use hypotheticals yourself! That'd be hypocrisy!"
Good thing I don't have to.
Check it out, I just cited Kentucky in a favorable light.There is no need to rely on the hypothetical calculations that we have described. The recent divergence of epidemics in Kentucky and Tennessee shows that even a few days' difference in action can have a big effect. Kentucky's social distancing measure was issued March 26; Tennessee waited until the last minute of March 31. As Kentucky moved to full statewide measures in reducing infection growth, Tennessee was usually less than a week behind. But as of Friday, the result was stark: Kentucky had 1,693 confirmed cases (379 per million population); Tennessee had 4,862 (712 per million).
"But Breccia! I thought you said Trump had no authority to end states' own actions! Wouldn't it be wrong to blame him for state failures?"
I believe I said that Trump couldn't overrule a state of emergency a governor issued. And I don't believe I've seen that contradicted. But
1) Trump could have acted sooner, as head of the federal government, taking his own actions, and
2) States don't get off the hook on this one. Some acted faster and more forcefully than others. Some got better results than others. I've pointed to Florida in particular. In fact, New York wasn't late but they were proportionately late, as the outbreak started in NYC sooner than most of the country.
That said, there is a difference between expecting police to magically appear between the first and second bullet fired by the murderer -- that's asking the impossible -- to asking why the police haven't shown up hours after the shooting started.
To make it more clear, Trump was told by US intelligence memos the coronavirus was a problem Feb 14th. Dr. Messonnier told the American people that the coronavirus was a major problem Feb 26th, the same day, Trump said the number of cases was going down not up.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings...ss-conference/ so no blaming Fake News today!I think every aspect of our society should be prepared. I don’t think it’s going to come to that, especially with the fact that we’re going down, not up. We’re going very substantially down, not up.
This is not a "Trump screwed up" post because we all know that, even if some of us would rather, I dunno, make ten alt accounts and spam the forums with walls of meaningless text rather than admit it. This is not "Trump and only Trump screwed up" because that's flat-out false. If there are ten people supposed to do a job, and one of them does it, great. If there are ten people supposed to do a job, and none of them do it, all of them are to blame.
24,000 preventable deaths and counting. The Shitshow continues.