“No witness interviews” fuckin idiot all the witness are the house members and senators...
I might as well say everyone who was what watching happen on Jan 6th is a witness.
Oh I'm not falling on either side of it--I just want to make sure people are making fun of him because he's a fucking idiot, not because of something that might come across as anti-Semitic if it turns out I'm right. I'm perfectly happy to be proven wrong.
EDIT: From what little I've read he sounds like the kind of person who would wear it as a "costume" to influence judges/juries and considering the crowd he's playing for in this case it wouldn't surprise me for him to leave it out.
I'll say, at least it looks like he came prepared with a printed out speech and props.
First guy looks like he scribbled his down on a legal pad on his way to the Capitol building.
Hey People! A President can commit ANY crime last day in office and then cant be prosecuted when he leaves! Sounds right
"Buh dah DEMS"
Basically should say "Listen you partisan hacks, we know you will vote to acquit cause you are gutless and have no morals. Let's vote". Sadly nothing will happen.
- - - Updated - - -
The funny thing is people have cynically said the same about Hillary Clinton and Benghazi. She was out of office when they had her speak and some of the hearings.
So if anyone leaves office they have immunity.
"Buh dah DEMS"
I mean, yeah, if you're not used to wearing one frequently then of course it's noticeable. Although I'd be surprised if you were still super conscious that you were wearing it after the first hour unless you were unduly fixated. Either way the bottom line remains there are dozens of reasons to think the dude is an idiot without trying to make up another. *shrug* You do you.
So the--
Hold on, I'm getting to that.
Trump's D-team argues that his impeachment is politically motivated.
"But...Trump lost."We’re really here because the majority of the House of Representatives does not want to face Donald Trump as a political candidate in the future.
Yes.
"That argument is old-man flaccid."
Yes.
Hmmmmm...why does it feels like he is saying it’s ok what happen on the 6th.
Also what happen to his speaking? He sounds shaky and scared. It was fine earlier.
So if I'm hearing him right, he's arguing that the only remedy is prosecution, and it's totally fine for him to resign one minute before an impeachment conviction because he can still be prosecuted legally. He's citing the constitution's clause that impeachment doesn't make the party immune from prosecution.
But there are some very obvious logical flaws there. Namely, to accept that argument that impeachment conviction doesn't make immune to prosecution, you're inherently accepting that a president who resigns one minute before his Senate conviction can still be convicted. After all, how could his impeachment conviction not grant immunity if he couldn't be convicted to begin with?
But it's also avoiding the question altogether. Our constitution doesn't say you can't run for office if you're convicted of a crime. If he resigns before he's convicted, and he can thus no longer be convicted, he avoids all political ramifications. He can run for public office again even if he's arrested. He can run for office from jail. It's been done before.
Wow, imagine that, a lawyer actually yielding back time he doesn't think would be productive, instead of continuing to talk just to hear himself talk. The Trump lawyers could learn something from him.
“Leadership: Whatever happens, you’re responsible. If it doesn’t happen, you’re responsible.” -- Donald J. Trump, 2013
"I don't take responsibility at all." -- Donald J. Trump, 2020
I think that was a serious mistake, really. They really should have addressed the arguments the second guy made, because they're going to be cited endlessly on Fox News despite having holes a mile wide. Like Trump's first impeachment, democrats look like they may fail the messaging game because they're too focused on the righteousness of their cause.