Mega-Thread: Trump Focused Discussion

[Endus]

It's like the non stop banter about white supremecy in the Rittenhouse trial that you guys bloviate about, but none of you talk about the black man who drove and swerved to hit as many white people as he could.

So, whataboutism.

Nobody's defending Darrel Brooks, either. Not sure why you think anyone is.

You can call it whataboutism, it's straight hypocrisy, something you guys know all too well.

If anyone was defending Brooks and calling his driving through a parade "self-defense", you might have a point about hypocrisy.

Nobody is, though, so you're just lying.

The media is doing their part, you know nothing about him. How can you claim something is whataboutism if you know nothing about it? Nice standard retort to something the media is covering up.

Nobody's covering it up. I literally just Googled it to make sure I got the guy's name right, first link was CNN.

There's just no debate, because everyone agrees it was a monstrous attack and Brooks was acting out of malice.

It's like CNN finally admitting that coumo was helping one of the worst governors avoid sexual harassment allegations. But I am sure you know nothing about that either.

Again, pretty much everyone on the left were right there on the "fuck Cuomo" train.

You're mistaking "needing a reason" with "mindlessly hating the guy just for being part of the other side's party".

Because this is the Trump discussion where all you guys talk about is covid(there is a thread for it) and white supremacy...because everything is about race, unless you steamroll an SUV through a crowd at a parade.

Every indication is that Brooks was a career criminal who'd just been involved in another domestic disturbance and who was approached by police (to redirect him away from the parade) when he reacted badly. There's no racial component there, you just want to introduce one, out of nowhere.

Then the media says a car did it, or an suv did it. Not a black man swerving to hit more white people.

What source are you reading that says it was an AI-controlled vehicle that was responsible? Cite your sources, because pulling shit right out of your own ass and demanding we take a big sniff is not an argument.

Your entire post is just making shit. Literally nothing you said here was true. You're just angry that your political opponents form opinions based on facts and evidence, rather than kneejerk emotional responses based on racism and political affiliation alone.

[Machismo]

It's like the non stop banter about white supremecy in the Rittenhouse trial that you guys bloviate about, but none of you talk about the black man who drove and swerved to hit as many white people as he could. You can call it whataboutism, it's straight hypocrisy, something you guys know all too well. The media is doing their part, you know nothing about him. How can you claim something is whataboutism if you know nothing about it? Nice standard retort to something the media is covering up.

It's like CNN finally admitting that coumo was helping one of the worst governors avoid sexual harassment allegations. But I am sure you know nothing about that either.

Because this is the Trump discussion where all you guys talk about is covid(there is a thread for it) and white supremacy...because everything is about race, unless you steamroll an SUV through a crowd at a parade. Then the media says a car did it, or an suv did it. Not a black man swerving to hit more white people. And somehow you guys lead it all back to a man who hasn't been in politics for almost a year. The man living rent free in your heads.

- - - Updated - - -



Most of the people are like cubby, int he dark because the media is hiding this news. Thanks for the slave analogy of me having a master. If i was someone like endus , I would report you 10 times to make sure you got banned. The people on this forum like to silence because they hate to use credible arguments...like the one you are making. No proof just antagonizing attacks on me. bravo.

You mean like all the Trump sycophants who continue to shill for him, despite the sexual assaults?

Well, this must be pretty awkward for you.

[Endus]

The denizens here attack Rittenhouse over and over with unproven allegations and yet are silent on a blm activist

Brooks wasn't a "BLM activist".

You're lying.

[Edge-]

Brooks wasn't a "BLM activist".

You're lying.

Apparently, according to racists, every Black person that does anything bad is a "BLM activist".

[Endus]

If i was someone like endus , I would report you 10 times to make sure you got banned.

What was it you said literally right before posting this, about people "living rent free in your heads"?

Lul.

[TexasRules]

Has there been evidence that it was a racially motivated attack or anything other than a guy with a long criminal history fleeing the police and having a tragic accident?

And yet it is proudly claimed here that Kyle Rittenhouse is a white supremacist without any proof. But his killing of 2 and wounding of 1 is claimed to be a racist motivated attack by the media and everyone on this board. So a black guy intentionally not turning in to cars and swerving to attack more white people is not racially motivated, but a white man killing 2 white people is? Could you imagine how may cities would be on fire right now if this was a white man who ran over black kids at a parade. The nonstop racial hatred on this board would be over the top insane.

[Edge-]

And yet it is proudly claimed here that Kyle Rittenhouse is a white supremacist without any proof. But his killing of 2 and wounding of 1 is claimed to be a racist motivated attack by the media and everyone on this board. So a black guy intentionally not turning in to cars and swerving to attack more white people is not racially motivated, but a white man killing 2 white people is? Could you imagine how may cities would be on fire right now if this was a white man who ran over black kids at a parade. The nonstop racial hatred on this board would be over the top insane.

I mean, I don't see a link in here so I'll just assume you're, again, repeating racist talking points without anything to back it up because you're not interested in discussion, just soap-boxing.

[cubby]

You sure do offer a lot of misinformation and lies to unpack. Good to have you back though. You Trumpkins never get dull.

It's like the non stop banter about white supremecy in the Rittenhouse trial that you guys bloviate about, but none of you talk about the black man who drove and swerved to hit as many white people as he could. You can call it whataboutism, it's straight hypocrisy, something you guys know all too well. The media is doing their part, you know nothing about him. How can you claim something is whataboutism if you know nothing about it? Nice standard retort to something the media is covering up.

Ruling: LIE

You changed the subject there cowboy. First we were talking about vandalism by someone similar to what I mentioned (the U.S. Reps offices in MI), but now you changed it to a horror show of a person who ran down and killed several people. More of your mistruths and lies.

Why didn't you put up a thread about it if the issues at hand were so important? The "media" is covering it up? Wow - more of your lies. IIRC that was on front page for over a week - and that was just the event, not a trial. Your whataboutism is still strong, you just apparently don't understand what the term means.

It's like CNN finally admitting that coumo was helping one of the worst governors avoid sexual harassment allegations. But I am sure you know nothing about that either.

Ruling: LIE

CNN "finally finding out" is the phrase you were looking for there. And did you notice the fired him immediately? Guess reality is tough for you to comprehend while you're swallowing all the lies that are shoved down your throat. Let us know if you're confused about any other words that are difficult.

Because this is the Trump discussion where all you guys talk about is covid(there is a thread for it) and white supremacy...because everything is about race, unless you steamroll an SUV through a crowd at a parade. Then the media says a car did it, or an suv did it. Not a black man swerving to hit more white people. And somehow you guys lead it all back to a man who hasn't been in politics for almost a year. The man living rent free in your heads.

Ruling: LIE

Really? 3,980 pages of "all [we] talk about is covid? Even before COVID came out? More of your LIES - I miss your old name.

IMost of the people are like cubby, int he dark because the media is hiding this news. Thanks for the slave analogy of me having a master. If i was someone like endus , I would report you 10 times to make sure you got banned. The people on this forum like to silence because they hate to use credible arguments...like the one you are making. No proof just antagonizing attacks on me. bravo.

I knew you had a crush on me. Media doesn't hide the news. You're just swallowing the lies you're told to believe by the right wing news-idiots you choose to follow. If you had any kind of balanced intake you'd know what you're saying is wrong.

[s_bushido]

[meaningless twaddle]

No one's talking about the black man who killed a bunch of people and is pretty much guaranteed to never see the sun as a free man for the rest of his life? Shocking. It's almost like holding people accountable for their crimes fails to exacerbate systemic issues with our law enforcement and justice systems. Well, until you consider all those black men serving sentences that are entirely too long...often for shit that shouldn't even be illegal in the first place.

[Edge-]

And did you notice the fired him immediately?

Minor correction - he's on "indefinite leave", he hasn't been fired yet. Though I imagine that should be coming as they make sure that his lies to them earlier violate his contract.

[cubby]

The denizens here attack Rittenhouse over and over with unproven allegations and yet are silent on a blm activist who ran an suv through a parade and killed children. He swerved to hit more people, to hurt as many as possible while avoiding hitting cars. You guys are saying nothing about the collective silence. Not tribalism, just not going to negatively speak against someone because they aren't your enemy party.

So Rittenhouse didn't run and hide with White Supremacists? You're going to die on that hill?

[Machismo]

And yet it is proudly claimed here that Kyle Rittenhouse is a white supremacist without any proof. But his killing of 2 and wounding of 1 is claimed to be a racist motivated attack by the media and everyone on this board. So a black guy intentionally not turning in to cars and swerving to attack more white people is not racially motivated, but a white man killing 2 white people is? Could you imagine how may cities would be on fire right now if this was a white man who ran over black kids at a parade. The nonstop racial hatred on this board would be over the top insane.

Nope, this is a lie.

The evidence was presented in this thread multiple times.

Do you have the evidence that the dude was a BLM activist, as you claimed?

[cubby]

Minor correction - he's on "indefinite leave", he hasn't been fired yet. Though I imagine that should be coming as they make sure that his lies to them earlier violate his contract.

Good point - I guess I jumped ahead of couple of chapters. I'll be first in line to condemn CNN if they don't fire him, assuming the allegations are true.

[Edge-]

Good point - I guess I jumped ahead of couple of chapters. I'll be first in line to condemn CNN if they don't fire him, assuming the allegations are true.

They're not allegations, it's the straight up emails and text messages that the AG had. Though if they don't fire him, they deserve all the shit they'll receive. I hope they do, but given that the re-hired "sorry I forgot to wear pants, or underwear, during a video call" Toobin I'm not completely competent they'll follow through. But for now they've made the right move.

[postman1782]

The denizens here attack Rittenhouse over and over with unproven allegations and yet are silent on a blm activist who ran an suv through a parade and killed children. He swerved to hit more people, to hurt as many as possible while avoiding hitting cars. You guys are saying nothing about the collective silence. Not tribalism, just not going to negatively speak against someone because they aren't your enemy party.

Considering he hung out with white supremacists more than once, Rittenhouse being a white supremacist, is proven. Especially since the night he went there with a white supremacist group, and then hung out with another one, illegally drinking in a bar, after he got out of prison. And was that guy that killed those people with his SUV a BLM activist? Did he do it in the name of BLM? No? Didn't fucking think so. But what Kyle was doing, was in the name of white supremacy.

- - - Updated - - -

And yet it is proudly claimed here that Kyle Rittenhouse is a white supremacist without any proof. But his killing of 2 and wounding of 1 is claimed to be a racist motivated attack by the media and everyone on this board. So a black guy intentionally not turning in to cars and swerving to attack more white people is not racially motivated, but a white man killing 2 white people is? Could you imagine how may cities would be on fire right now if this was a white man who ran over black kids at a parade. The nonstop racial hatred on this board would be over the top insane.

Again, there is plenty of proof with who he was hanging with before the murders and after he got out on bail that he is a white supremacist. He is only trying to say he isn't, so he doesn't get sued into fucking oblivion.

[cubby]

The denizens here attack Rittenhouse over and over with unproven allegations and yet are silent on a blm activist who ran an suv through a parade and killed children. He swerved to hit more people, to hurt as many as possible while avoiding hitting cars. You guys are saying nothing about the collective silence. Not tribalism, just not going to negatively speak against someone because they aren't your enemy party.

You're confused, and again, lying. The accusations on here against Rittenhouse were mostly accurate, backed up by trial evidence. Him being found not guilty of murder is an indictment on the justice system in general and Wisconsin's "self-defense" law in particular.

If you care to cite anything in this forum re Rittenhouse that was "unproven" let us know - we're all ears. What you constantly misunderstand is that just because you disagree with things on this forum doesn't mean you're right. Because you rarely, if ever, are. Most of your posts are lies and misinformation that you get from the biased sources you choose to use to fill your echo chamber. We see it all the time once you open the throttle on your posting. We're seeing it right now. Several relatively intelligent people on this forum have pointed out your lies, and you just keep spewing more and more of them as if drinking from the fire hose was a higher calling.

You're a Trumpkin, and part of the new Post-Fact Era, so sadly there is nothing to be done. You'll never read a news article that's contrary to your opinion, and you'll never ask yourself if you might be wrong. Facts, reality, and most importantly daily events are irrelevant to you. As the world you need to live involves finding "sides" to everything (example - the Rittenhouse verdict wasn't partisan - only the Right is calling it that), you'll be forever trapped seeing only the side you want and need to see.

If you ever decide to have a frank conversation with yourself, and pull up those bootstraps to consider a different point of view, I will be the first person to take your call. You might be surprised on how many things we actually agree on.

[Fugus]

I see DocSavageFan's alt is back. Guess I get to go back to ignoring 10-20+ pages of the threads again because it will be nothing worth reading.... Could trust pitch in and derail the thread too since there is never any consequences for it worth mentioning.

[Breccia]

It's like the non stop banter about white supremecy in the Rittenhouse trial

This thread is not about Kyle Rittenhouse. Please post responsibly.

The denizens here attack Rittenhouse

This thread is not about Kyle Rittenhouse. Please post responsibly.

And yet it is proudly claimed here that Kyle Rittenhouse

This thread is not about Kyle Rittenhouse. Please post responsibly.

[beanman12345]

I see DocSavageFan's alt is back. Guess I get to go back to ignoring 10-20+ pages of the threads again because it will be nothing worth reading.... Could trust pitch in and derail the thread too since there is never any consequences for it worth mentioning.

Yeah the trumpster needs some attention.

[Breccia]

Jan 6th committee passes along a recommendation to the DoJ to have Clark bitchslapped for contempt.

Clark was one of Trump's yes-men at the DoJ. I'm just guessing here, but there miiiiiiiiiiiiiight be one or two career officials there ready to slap the cuffs on.

Just so we're clear: while Bannon was not a WH employee and could therefore not be covered by Executive Time at all, Clark could. Except...Trump never invoked it for Clark. And he can't now. Clark's refusal to testify is going to cost him.