Mega-Thread: Trump Focused Discussion

[Poopymonster]

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/rcna43376



In which conservatives are so vile and so far gone that they're harassing health care professionals who are working caring for children.

When the fuck can we ship them off to Kekistan and the fuck outta this country.

Yes they are vile. They also had zero problems killing doctors at Planned Parenthood.

[Edge-]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ice-department

Florida Republicans intentionally targeted Black voters when they enacted new voting restrictions last year, the justice department said in a court filing on Wednesday.

The department told a federal appellate court that a lower court had correctly evaluated claims of racial discrimination when it came to Florida’s new law. In March, US District Judge Mark Walker blocked new restrictions on the availability of absentee ballot drop boxes, regulations for third party voter registration groups, and a ban on providing food and water to people standing in line to vote. The US court of appeals for the 11th circuit paused that ruling earlier this year while it considers an appeal from Florida officials.

The justice department’s allegation of racial discrimination is significant because the agency carefully chooses when to get involved in voting dispute litigations filed by private plaintiffs, and the department’s voice carries significant credibility in court. After going largely quiet under Donald Trump, the justice department’s voting section has filed challenges to voting laws in Georgia, Texas and Arizona, in addition to filing several briefs in other voting disputes.

An argument in support of a finding of racial discrimination offers a significant legal boost to challengers of the case, though the challenge to the law faces an uphill battle at the deeply-conservative 11th circuit.

The justice department said it agreed with the court’s findings that Florida lawmakers enacted those provisions knowing they would harm Black voters after the 2020 election in which turnout surged. The Florida law, the department said, violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination in voting practices.

“The district court’s core factual findings are that, in the face of surging turnout in the 2020 election, the Florida Legislature responded by enacting provisions that impose disparate burdens on Black voters,” DoJ lawyers wrote in their brief. “Which were chosen precisely because of those burdens to secure a partisan advantage. The court’s findings of discriminatory intent are a permissible view of the record based on the entirety of the evidence.”

Florida lawyers dispute that the law is racially discriminatory.

“Facially neutral laws regulating drop boxes for vote-by-mail ballots, the return of voter registration forms, and activity at or near a polling place fall squarely within the state’s power to manage “[t]he time, places and manner of holding elections”, lawyers representing the Florida secretary of state and attorney general wrote in a brief to the 11th circuit.

“In concluding otherwise, the district court focused on the distant past and disparities rooted in evidence that was “limited,” “unclear,” “not necessarily representative,” and “not statistically significant.”’

In his March ruling, Walker also took the unusual step of saying the risk of racial discrimination was so severe, Florida needed to get approval from a federal court for the next decade moving for changes in its voting law. The 11th circuit also blocked that portion of his ruling while considering appeal.

The justice department declined to weigh in on whether that remedy was needed, but suggested seeking further clarification from Walker.

Republicans intentionally trying to disenfranchise Black voters? Tell me it isn't so! It must be a day that ends in Y.

[Breccia]

The CDC admits it wasn't ready for COVID-19.

"We were led by a science denier and anti-vaxxer," they said, "what did you expect?"

The series of steps to be taken include efforts to better communicate with the public, speed up data releases and produce actionable data, AP reported.

The plans include restructuring the CDC's communications office and revamping its websites to make public health guidance clearer and easier to find.

The CDC will also add more staff to teams that respond to public health emergencies and require these employees to remain in their positions for at least six months, solving a problem of high turnover that proved confusing and time consuming during the pandemic, per the New York Times.

The agency will also alter its promotion system to place less emphasis on the number of published scientific papers an employee has and more on efforts to positively impact public health, the Times reported.

[Cthulhu 2020]

The mere fact that Trump is likely going to get shitcanned on a law he turned from a misdemeanor into a felony is such delicious irony I think my political taste buds will be sated for awhile.

[s_bushido]

The mere fact that Trump is likely going to get shitcanned on a law he turned from a misdemeanor into a felony is such delicious irony I think my political taste buds will be sated for awhile.

If that does end up happening...if this of all things is what rids us of him, that would be amazing. I'm not holding my breath that it will, but history would have a field-day with that.

[Kaleredar]

If that does end up happening...if this of all things is what rids us of him, that would be amazing. I'm not holding my breath that it will, but history would have a field-day with that.

Just like Al Capone. Dangerously insane, self-absorbed mob boss, most certainly guilty of perpetrating and orchestrating numerous heinous crimes. Caught for Tax evasion.


I'll save my yippees for when/if Trump is actually punished in any meaningful way (personally, I'd be pretty happy with "can never hold public office in these United States ever again,) but it is quite funny that this thing that Trump did most likely out of pure narcissism because he didn't want to be told what he could and couldn't do could sink him.


I'd love some sort of law that says something to the effect of "Convicted Felons cannot hold office until four years spent in good standing have eclipsed since finishing their sentence." Would mean that people that made a genuine mistake in their lives, served their time, and then kept their noses clean could still hold office... but would basically knock the political wind out of anyone that attempted to manipulate the political system and got caught.

Trump was right about the "swamp needing to be cleaned," but he was wrong about who exactly that swamp comprised of, and that it turns out he was the swampiest of all of them. It's become quite apparent that the American political system relies chiefly on things like "decorum," "morality," and many things that political leaders are expected to abide by because they supposedly respect the office. But those things mean nothing to someone like Trump, and so do not bind him. That's why we need laws that do that. Finely hones, targeted ones, drafted specifically to crater people like Trump and his lackeys.

[Breccia]

Despite claims, there's no 'magic wand' for a president to declassify documents

Expert after expert keeps saying the same thing.

For most government employees who seek to have information declassified, their requests must go through a rigorous review process that can span the entire U.S. intelligence community, in order to ensure that sources, methods and other national security interests are protected. "[But] there's no formal process that a president is required to follow when declassifying information," Brian Greer, a former CIA attorney who specialized in classification issues, told ABC News.

Nevertheless, Greer noted, "there has to be evidence that a declassification order occurred." And in Trump's case, "the Trump team has yet to produce any credible evidence," he said.

This expert is saying, of all the experts I've seen so far, the minimum amount that has to be done...and Trump didn't do it.

And everyone involved knows it.

FBI interviewed top Trump White House lawyers in Mar-a-Lago document inquiry

Two top lawyers in Donald Trump’s White House have been interviewed by the FBI in relation to the ongoing investigation into the storage of classified documents at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, a person familiar with the matter said Tuesday.

Pat Cipollone and Patrick Philbin, who served as White House counsel and Deputy White House counsel, respectively, have spoken with the FBI. Cipollone in July also testified in front of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

The two attorneys are the highest-ranking Trump administration officials known to have been interviewed so far in the federal probe which took a dramatic turn last week when the FBI searched Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property.

We know who Cipollone is. His name is all over the Jan 6th insurrection. Philbin is less well-known, but, both of these lawyers were basically Trump's men handling these classified documents. Philbin had testified in the spring, and the FBI still came to Trump's house. As their names were on the short list, the National Archives very likely reached out to them first. Clearly, they didn't like what they heard.

But it's not like Trump's mishandling of documents was common knowledge, was it?

Bolton tells Reuters that, yes, it was. He called out that the White House dining room had "piles" of them, most notably the famous love letters from Kim.

Bolton also pointed out that Trump loved showing these documents to people, classified or otherwise.

And he called Trump a liar for his claim of a "standing order".

I was never briefed on any such order, procedure, policy when I came in. If he were to say something like that, you would have to memorialize that, so that people would know it existed.

When somebody begins to concoct lies like this, it shows a real level of desperation.

"Surely these are just disgruntled employees lying about Trump!"

Trump has amassed a giant, fat bloated body. He also has acquired a large number of people he hired that are saying, in public, Trump is a lying loser criminal. At some point, the sheer number of people Trump willingly invited into his inner circle saying Trump screwed up will convince any reasonable person. Failing that, they'll take the stand (which Trump won't) and settle the issue with the only 12 people that matter.

- - - First Dated - - -

Few more things:

1) GA Gov Kemp filed a motion to block the subpoena to testify about, yes, the Trump extortion attempt and fake electors. Odd that he'd wait this long...maybe he thought Giuliani (etc.) wouldn't make it to trial? I think he's in trouble. Kemp probably also thinks he's in trouble, but he's claiming in the filing that this is being done now while he's running for office.

Aww. A Trump supporter who doesn't like it when someone messes with the election. The time to stand up for that was two years ago.

2) I forgot to mention, from that same Bolton interview, Bolton said there did not appear to be a partisan motive to the FBI.

3) Sad sack of human refuse Alex Jones formally backs DeSantis.

[Edge-]

3) Sad sack of human refuse Alex Jones formally backs DeSantis.

I hope he at least realizes that Ron won't be dumb enough to come on his show like Trump. He's not gonna get his new senpai to notice him the way his old senpai did.

[Tentim]

I hope he at least realizes that Ron won't be dumb enough to come on his show like Trump. He's not gonna get his new senpai to notice him the way his old senpai did.

Wait is Ron Paul planning to run?!?

[P for Pancetta]

An interesting fact regarding the declassification of nuclear weapon related documentation is that the president can't declassify that himself. It requires a process.

[gondrin]

Just like Al Capone. Dangerously insane, self-absorbed mob boss, most certainly guilty of perpetrating and orchestrating numerous heinous crimes. Caught for Tax evasion.


I'll save my yippees for when/if Trump is actually punished in any meaningful way (personally, I'd be pretty happy with "can never hold public office in these United States ever again,) but it is quite funny that this thing that Trump did most likely out of pure narcissism because he didn't want to be told what he could and couldn't do could sink him.


I'd love some sort of law that says something to the effect of "Convicted Felons cannot hold office until four years spent in good standing have eclipsed since finishing their sentence." Would mean that people that made a genuine mistake in their lives, served their time, and then kept their noses clean could still hold office... but would basically knock the political wind out of anyone that attempted to manipulate the political system and got caught.

Trump was right about the "swamp needing to be cleaned," but he was wrong about who exactly that swamp comprised of, and that it turns out he was the swampiest of all of them. It's become quite apparent that the American political system relies chiefly on things like "decorum," "morality," and many things that political leaders are expected to abide by because they supposedly respect the office. But those things mean nothing to someone like Trump, and so do not bind him. That's why we need laws that do that. Finely hones, targeted ones, drafted specifically to crater people like Trump and his lackeys.

Quite a few people get caught for far worse crimes after they get pulled over for a minor thing like a taillight being out, slightly speeding or expired tags.

[Breccia]

An interesting fact regarding the declassification of nuclear weapon related documentation is that the president can't declassify that himself. It requires a process.

This is both true and relevant, as we've discussed before. Even if Trump had a standing order -- he didn't -- it doesn't work on everything. Nuclear secrets is the one we're talking about the most, but there are others.

The case of Scooter Libby stands out. Granted, it's not a perfect parallel -- there's never been a criminal in the WH as much as Trump was -- but he was tried and convicted of handing out classified intel he wasn't supposed to, even with Oval Office consent. In addition to nuclear secrets, handing out the names of US agents in the field is something else the President can't simply order on whim. The Libby case is sometimes called "the first time in memory that the question of unilateral presidential declassifications arose"

Libby wasn't convicted of being a spy. He was, however, convicted of lying to the FBI, lying on the stand, and obstruction of justice. Guess what else Trump faces?

So, again, there is no "magic wand". Not only is Trump's declaration of a "standing order" questionable at best, considering what the FBI found, it might be meaningless even if true.

[Flarelaine]

3) Sad sack of human refuse Alex Jones formally backs DeSantis.

On the face, he's giving support to DeSantis.

In truth, he's begging for some. Probably hoping for a pardon in early 2025.

[Breccia]

On the face, he's giving support to DeSantis.

In truth, he's begging for some. Probably hoping for a pardon in early 2025.

Huh. What has Jones done, that would lead to a criminal, federal conviction, one might ask?

[Flarelaine]

Huh. What has Jones done, that would lead to a criminal, federal conviction, one might ask?

Nothing off the top of my head, but Jones might be able to think of something. The Jan 6 commission subpoenaed his phone records, didn't they?

[Breccia]

The Jan 6 commission subpoenaed his phone records, didn't they?

They did, but probably didn't need to. The Texas plaintiffs surely would have handed them over for a "thank you".

[Flarelaine]

They did, but probably didn't need to. The Texas plaintiffs surely would have handed them over for a "thank you".

Still, what if they find it was a conspiracy and Jones had a part?

[Breccia]

Still, what if they find it was a conspiracy and Jones had a part?

We already know Alex Jones helped organize the rally that would eventually become the murderous insurrection. It's only a question of "why".

[Poopymonster]

Huh. What has Jones done, that would lead to a criminal, federal conviction, one might ask?

Bankruptcy fraud.

[gondrin]

Weisselberg pleads guilty. Falls on the sword for The Angry Orange. I hope before he dies in prison that he gives up the goods on said Orange.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news...2bd2cdea75888b

Allen Weisselberg—Longtime Trump Organization CFO—Pleads Guilty In Tax Scheme

Allen Weisselberg, a longtime Trump Organization CFO, pleaded guilty to 15 criminal tax fraud charges on Thursday—admitting to conspiring in a scheme to avoid paying taxes on corporate benefits—marking a blow to the former president’s family business as it prepares for trial on related charges in October.

Weisselberg, who was indicted on tax fraud charges last summer, is charged with grand larceny and avoiding tax payments on more than $1.7 million in corporate benefits from the Trump Organization over the 16-year scheme, including car payments, school tuition and rent.

Under the plea deal, Weisselberg, who was facing up to 15 years behind bars for grand larceny under New York state law, now faces five months in prison, and is likely to serve as little as 100 days for good behavior, the New York Times reported (the grand larceny charge carries no mandatory minimum under state law).

Donald Trump is not charged in the criminal investigation or accused of any wrongdoing.

Weisselberg, who previously pleaded not guilty, also agreed in the plea deal to testify on his role in the corporate benefits scheme at trial in October—the first case out of a two-year investigation into the former president’s business—but refused to implicate Trump or his family, taking jail time rather than calling out the family he’s worked with for nearly 50 years and potentially delivering a blow to prosecutors who saw Weisselberg as their key cooperator into the Trump Organization’s business practices.

Weisselberg, 75, got his start with the Trump family working for the former president’s father, Fred Trump, in 1973. He was charged, along with the company, with tax fraud, by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office last summer, one year into the civil investigation into Weisselberg and the Trump Organization. Trump and Weisselberg have called the investigation “politically motivated,” and in February requested a judge dismiss the criminal charges against them. Their request was denied. In July, Weisselberg and his lawyer surrendered to New York authorities at a courthouse in Manhattan, the New York Times reported.