Hmm. Won't that be interesting. I don't know if Meadows will say "I have Trump's permission to arrange a murderous insurrection" but Meadows being dragged to court will still be a massive result.
- - - Updated - - -
Special counsel subpoena's Raffensperger. And some other close 2020 states. So far, it sounds like he's only asking for some documents, seemingly communications with Team Trump, not testimony.
"What? The special counsel is asking to break lawyer-client confidentiality? For shame!"
No, that's not what he's doing at all. As the story I cited clearly states, he's asking state governments to provide their records of communications with Team Trump lawyers. Since these state governments did not hire these Trump lawyers, no privilege applies.
"But that Trump lawyer, he said this was an overreach and the communications were privileged!"
I mean, yes, he did physically cause those words to come out of his mouth. I don't believe they have any
meaning. Doctor-patient confidentiality ends when you bring your prostitute to FUCK lawyer-client confidentiality ends when you bring a third party into the mix. I can't see any realistic way that a lawyer, working for Trump, talking to a state government, would be considered confidential. And even if they thought it was, the fact that the state governments have those records kind of shits on that argument.
Or, I guess I could be misreading something. Hey @
cubby can you explain what Bruce Marks is on about? Is there actually a legal point here?