No.
Trump appeals dismissal of countersuit.
"On what grounds?"
He doesn't want to lose.
"No, really."
"Oh, the delay thing again."
Yep. Incidentally, other headlines have said Smith is pushing for a Jan 2 trial date. If they both manage to get their wish, it'll be "fun" to see Trump ask each judge in each trial for yet another delay so he can also not attend the other trial.
- - - Updated - - -
So,
Dershowitz is having a time of it, man.
He just suggested...indicting Jack Smith.
"
Why?"
Well, Dershowitz is a known Trump supporter who--
"No no, why indict Smith?"
Oh, Dershowitz claims Smith committed fraud by citing in the indictment that Trump ordered his cultists to protest, but left out the word "peacefully". To him, that's a felony.
"Um...has Smith been arrested based on this discovery?"
Oh, of course not. Dershowitz is grasping desperately at straws. Someone who is arrested for stealing can point out the 364 days out of the year he didn't steal anything, but if he stole on the 365th
he's still a thief. It doesn't matter what Trump said or did that
wasn't a crime. It matters what
was.
"Okay, but if Smith misrepresented something on the indictment itself, isn't that a problem?"
Considering the Jan 6th riot incitement is not actually part of the crimes Trump is charged with, no.
"What reputable, fact-based source did Dershowitz publish this on?"
americainsider.org which, funny story, I looked for it on Media Bias Fact Check, they gave results for
Russia Insider. They don't even seem to have a Wikipedia entry.