I'd say the chance of 4a and b being broken is basically 100%.
I'd say the chance of 4a and b being broken is basically 100%.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Trump will find out the hard way that this is one judge (and DA) that doesn't vacillate. After he leaves Ga tomorrow, he's going to find himself in handcuffs and back in that courtroom a lot sooner than he thinks.
Pence's chief of staff says Meadows was "central" to the plot and that concerns me.
Pence is not charged and I think it's pretty clear he was not involved. Like, that seems pretty obvious.I think that in your last panel, I think it was it’s fair to say that Mark was the ringleader of much the events that happened around January 6, he was somebody who was — Trump sought to find additional attorneys who gave advice different than White House counsel, and it was very central to the events that happen on that day.
So there had been a lot of conversations leading up to this and Mark was central to pulling together many of those who were I think whispering falsehoods into the president’s ear
But this guy, and possibly Pence by extension, seems to be pushing "Trump was tricked".
If I'm wrong, my bad, and I'll happily take that L.
If I'm right, this is extremely dangerous, as it is an attempt to free Trump of all consequences of his words and actions -- including, yes, backing false electors, lying to Georgia, and spending the last two years and change saying the election was rigged and his actions were valid.
Not only is this dangerous because it would make the country's biggest, fattest traitor since Nixon "not guilty" the attempt to do so is also "Trump was so gullible, so stupid, so unaware that the yes-men he intentionally hired tricked him into leading a murderous insurrection...and now please re-elect him".
Let's pretend Trump was tricked. Let's pretend he was misled. What part of Meadows and co. getting him to tell the country, the world, "I won the election and I will fight it beyond all legal limits" makes Trump worthy of returning to the WH? Look at his work with Putin and Kim, that checks out.
However...it could be worse. This claim isn't "Trump didn't do it". This claim isn't even "Trump did nothing wrong". This is, basically, an admission Trump did something that was wrong. UnConstitutional, even. But the claim is that he did something wrong, but should not be held accountable, and should be given the chance to do it again.
Does anyone here have a different take? Does anyone have a Tucker Carlson interview bingo card?
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Okay I've never been arrested, mostly because they haven't found the bodies yet, so I'm not fully aware of how the system works.
Eastman spent several hours in jail before bond was posted. Hours. He surrendered on purpose on his own schedule. I assumed he brought his checkbook and probably at least one other human being with him. Does it really take hours, even with everything lined up and ready to go? If so, man, Trump is in for a treat.
Yeah but surely Eastman, a lawyer...for now...knew all that when he surrendered? Again, it would not surprise me if regulations and paperwork put everyone in a cell, even if they had a briefcase full of $100s on them at the time, I just don't know if that's the case. I'm just 100% convinced Eastman didn't want to be in a cell and would have taken steps to prevent it.
So either
1) it really is impossible to get booked without waiting in a cell for hours, no matter what, and if so have fun Trump
2) it really is possible to cut that down, and for some reason, Eastman couldn't do that, or
3) Eastman has a thing about shitting in front of strangers.
Fulton County...no one wants to spend any time there...
...not as bad as I thought.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mar-a-l...counsel-probe/
Protip: The feds love a fucking snitch. They really do. So if you end up lying to the feds to protect someone else and find yourself possibly going down with the person you're protecting, flip on them. Because the feds are liable to reduce/drop charges, and won't even add fresh charges for lying to them in the first place.The Mar-a-Lago IT employee who, according to a federal court filing, implicated former President Donald Trump and two of his aides in an alleged pressure campaign to delete security camera footage at the Florida resort was advised by special counsel Jack Smith's team that he would not face perjury charges after he amended his testimony, a source familiar with the investigation told CBS News.
Yuscil Taveras was assured by federal prosecutors in recent weeks that he was no longer the target of a criminal probe into whether he had lied in his grand jury testimony and would not be charged for allegedly lying to investigators by telling them that he had no knowledge of efforts to delete the footage that was of interest to Smith's team, the source said.
I mean, otherwise, why would anyone?
- - - Updated - - -
So we've been following the issue with Giuliani recently, the story that he's out of money and can no longer support his lifestyle of hiring defense lawyers and staying out of jail.
Well, of course Trump came to the aid of a long-time friend and co-conspirator, since anything else would just be legal suicide and get him thrown in prison, and handed Giuliani some of his own money, out of the goodness of his heart and/or not wanting to die behind bars.
Just kidding, it was PAC money.
Just kidding, it wasn't even that.
He's hosting a fundraiser, asking Republicans to spend $100,000 of their own money to pay his own disgraced lawyer and co-conspirator, because he cba.
Guests can expect gifts such as "publicly self-identifying as supporting the insurrection" and "wondering if the money will actually go to Giuliani, this is the man who stole from a children's cancer hospital" and "wait, if Trump and Giuliani are there, can they talk without their lawyers present?" and "if I was going to just hand Giuliani some cash, why wouldn't I have done that by now?"
Speaking of which, there is no fundraiser scheduled for Ellis, who apparently, has a GoFundYourself that has reached $111,000 also known as "one and one-ninth of one seat at the table with Giuliani, but at least I get to collect it".
- - - Updated - - -
I just saw a video on the topic -- Trump may have gone with Thursday because of ratings. Specifically, he wants to stomp on the RNC debate and make it all about him.
Yeah I went through this too quickly last time, shame on me. Smith isn't doing this out of the goodness of his heart, he's doing this because Taveras knew he was objectively guilty of perjury, and even if the "stealing government top secret property" charges somehow vanished, that wouldn't.
- - - Updated - - -
‘Dark Brandon’ ads backing abortion rights swarm FoxNews.com ahead of debate
Like...why would FOX News even take this money? Well, you know the rules, if it appears on FOX News I get CNN points. *ding* once for the X article andThe “Dark Brandon” ads will be displayed on FoxNews.com beginning midnight Tuesday running through Thursday morning “highlighting President Biden’s commitment to fighting a national abortion ban and codify Roe,” the campaign said.
“Get real, Jack. I’m bringing Roe back,” the ad reads.
“Only Dark Brandon knows where he’ll appear,” Biden deputy campaign manager Rob Flaherty told People magazine, which first reported the Fox News ad buy.
Yep, there they are. *ding* for that one, I'll be checking throughout the debates.
Dibs on Trump's mugshot for my avatar.
"Buh dah DEMS"
I mean...if you promise to let @Skroe borrow it, should he ever come back?
- - - Updated - - -
The GA DA is not done going upside Clark's head.
Oh, andDefendant Jeffrey Bossert Clark has moved this Court for an Emergency Motion to Stay the pending State court criminal proceedings against him based on an apparent misread of the applicable statutes, a misapprehension of the binding caselaw, and a fundamental misunderstanding of criminal procedure—both state and federal.
Defendant Clark boldly asks this Court for expeditious action when he himself has shown no urgency,” the response continues. “The defendant and his co-defendants were indicted on August 14, 2023, with leave by the District Attorney to voluntarily surrender in lieu of arrest by noon on August 25, 2023. The defendant inexplicably waited seven days, until August 21, to even notify this Court through a notice of removal that he intended to argue removal [to federal court] was appropriate. It took him just as long to file the instant demand that this Court issue a stay of the State court proceedings by 5 pm the following day (August 22, 2023).
The defendant’s Motion demanded a halt to the State Court proceedings to avert the necessity of his ‘rushed travel arrangements to fly into Atlanta’ to present himself for voluntarily surrender by the August 25 deadline in lieu of the service of an arrest warrant, as numerous of his co-defendants have now done.
As inconvenient as modern air travel can admittedly be, whatever nuisance involved in the defendant securing a flight to Atlanta within the window provided is self-evidently insufficient justification to invoke this Court’s authority to enjoin a State felony criminal prosecution.
The defendant seeks to avoid the inconvenience and unpleasantness of being arrested or subject to the mandatory State criminal process, but provides this Court no legal basis to justify those ends. Defendant is wrong on the law, wrong on the facts, and the Motion should be denied.
There is just so much boom, headshot in there. First, note that Willis points out in public that Clark was given the chance to surrender, refuting Clark's claim nobody told him. And second, the fact that he waited a week, and when he filed a response, gave less than a day in return. And third, of course, is "no evidence and no law supports this claim" the Trump 2024 campaign slogan. I'm guessing the first draft included the term "white privilege" and Willis personally had it removed, but it sure reads like it was implied.Respectfully submitted
If Clark is having trouble finding a flight to his arrest, I suggest booking dot com.
Jenna Ellis, esquire (?), did not listen to the advice of many, many other lawyers and she chose to smile in her mugshot. Don't smile in your mugshot, doesn't look good to juries and all.
Seriously, with all these mugshots, I couldn't help but remember a scene from Archer.
Unsexiest mob of all time indeed.