1. #90081
    Quote Originally Posted by s_bushido View Post
    Problem with "wealth" like this (even if his wasn't laughably overexaggerated) is that it's not as liquid as just having $45k in the bank. It's tied up in a bunch of other shit. And in Trump's case, he's leveraged basically everything already, iirc.
    Nah no matter how non-liquid your stuff is, you can't tell me you don't find a buck and 30 cents if your net worth is 45k

  2. #90082
    yeah Trump had the money and could have gotten the money easily. But Trump is Trump and if he can get someone else to pay for it he will do that 100 out of 100 times.
    It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death

  3. #90083
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    42,469
    Quote Originally Posted by s_bushido View Post
    And in Trump's case, he's leveraged basically everything already, iirc.
    Hey, didn't Trump comment on exactly this? Hold on.

    Trump claims he has $500 million in cash, undercutting lawyers' claims on bond money

    There we go. Issue of liquidity resolved.

    Now following @Twdft this would be like having $5,000 in the bank and being unwilling to pay $1.30 Proportionately that's better, but still bad.

    "But wasn't Trump lying?"

    Yes he was, both times. Know what else he was lying about?

    Welcome back to 2018.

    Trump acknowledged a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels on Thursday, but said a non-disclosure agreement was "used to stop the false and extortionist accusations made by her about an affair."

    Contradicting previous statements that he knew nothing about any sort of payment, Trump tweeted that these agreements are "very common among celebrities and people of wealth."

    Trump also tweeted that campaign funds "played no roll in this transaction" — misspelling the term "role" — though some legal analysts said the previously unreported payment could be considered an in-kind political contribution subject to federal law.

    Giuliani, appearing Thursday on Fox & Friends, to discuss the non-disclosure agreement, said: “Imagine if that came out on October 15, 2016, in the middle of the last debate with Hillary Clinton?"

    Later, in an appearance on Fox Business Network, Giuliani said, "this was never about the campaign. This was about personal reputation. The money wasn’t paid to help the campaign or hurt the campaign."
    Wow. A lot of that aged really badly.

    But yes, Trump said it was a completely fine thing to do. Which is why he hid everything behind someone else's bank account. And yes, those interviews/that article came out because Cohen was singing to the cops about his role in what he flat-out admitted was illegally paying off Trump's whore.

    He should have just paid directly with a business check, if he was telling the truth about it being a completely fine and normal and common and bigly and yuge thing to do. He didn't. He was lying.

    Or, he could have paid nothing and said "Stormy Daniels is a liar, do not believe her." Which...he did, didn't he? Could have saved the money entirely. He didn't, he want to risk that people would believe her, which yes in 2016 they would have. So it became "pay her off, push the laptop which turned out to be nothing".

    The big thing on the way is Cohen's testimony. Everyone knows what Cohen did was illegal. Cohen will say, on the stand, "I did so on behalf of my client, Donald Trump, who knew this was illegal because I told him it was illegal." We all know that's coming. It will be followed with "Can you prove you told him?" And that's what I want to see the most.

  4. #90084
    Looks like at the end of court today, they got 7 jurors seated. Who knows how big of a jury pool they have left or if they have to call in more.

  5. #90085
    Pandaren Monk masterhorus8's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,914
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    Looks like at the end of court today, they got 7 jurors seated. Who knows how big of a jury pool they have left or if they have to call in more.
    Based on my own experience in a jury, I have no faith in a jury system.

    - - - Updated - - -

    I just heard a story on ABC World News about SCOTUS taking up a case about the DOJ misusing a law they're charging for obstructing Congress. One of the fuckwit judges actually tries to compare this to that congressman that pulled the fire alarm, as some sort of attempt to stop them from voting. Holy shit, I'm so tired of these political hacks.
    10

  6. #90086
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    42,469
    Quote Originally Posted by masterhorus8 View Post
    I just heard a story on ABC World News about SCOTUS taking up a case about the DOJ misusing a law they're charging for obstructing Congress.
    Yes. The issue is "corrupt intent". Directly attacking the fair and legal vote with the specific motive to stop the fair and legal vote, apparently, is not "corrupt intent".

  7. #90087
    Pandaren Monk masterhorus8's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Yes. The issue is "corrupt intent". Directly attacking the fair and legal vote with the specific motive to stop the fair and legal vote, apparently, is not "corrupt intent".
    Yeah, that part baffles me, too. One of them specifically questioned "stopping the vote" as being different from "changing the vote". Like, what? Making a vote not happen is indeed changing the results.
    10

  8. #90088
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    42,469
    Quote Originally Posted by masterhorus8 View Post
    Yeah, that part baffles me, too. One of them specifically questioned "stopping the vote" as being different from "changing the vote". Like, what? Making a vote not happen is indeed changing the results.
    I mean, even if that was somehow true, "obstruct" means "stop".

  9. #90089
    Merely a Setback Kaleredar's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    phasing...
    Posts
    27,407
    Quote Originally Posted by masterhorus8 View Post
    Based on my own experience in a jury, I have no faith in a jury system.
    Maybe, but Trump's lawyers don't exactly come off as competent showmen that can charm a crowd. They, and their client, are coming off as petulant, stubborn, and whiny.

    Also, in most criminal cases that actually go to trial, defendants are found guilty. By a non-trivial margin.

    Nothing is guaranteed, obviously. But Trump had better hope that his lawyers can pull one hell of a Chewbacca defense, because I don't really see them explaining their way around this in any way.
    “Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Kaleredar is right...
    Words to live by.

  10. #90090
    The Lightbringer D Luniz's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    The Coastal Plaguelands
    Posts
    3,109
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasulis View Post
    I thought it would take 9 - 12 months for DJT to become penny stock. I forgot the internet accelerates the process. When Trump went public with the Taj Mahal in 1996, the WWW was still in its infancy. People still depends mostly on printed source of materials for their investment. No more. It is interesting to see how fast DJT stock respond to good news and bad news.

    Started this morning at $24.38. News came out that DJT will have Live TV streaming. Went up to $25.30. Then Devin Nunes opened his mouth.



    Basically saying that "we will stream contents that nobody want to watch." You could hear the sucking noise that made right away.

    Down to $23 now. If the trend holds steady, it will become penny stock in another 3 to 4 weeks.
    its not that nobody wants to watch
    its that only bigots and assholes want to watch
    and they tend to be to poor to afford extras cause they cant get good jobs cause no one wants to lose business by employing them.
    Its why RW boycotts tend to be such fail. Companies follow money, not just the loudest voice.
    "Law and Order", lots of places have had that, Russia, North Korea, Saddam's Iraq.
    Laws can be made to enforce order of cruelty and brutality.
    Equality and Justice, that is how you have peace and a society that benefits all.

  11. #90091
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    42,469
    Habba goes on FOX News *ding* and says the report of Trump falling asleep is

    But no, you know, I’ve heard that report. It’s unlikely. I know him. I sat through trial after trial with him. That never happens. So Trump is incredibly focused.
    "Oh, Habba was there?"

    No.

    "But the NYTimes reporter was?"

    Yes.

    "Does Habba, in theory an experienced lawyer, know that Haberman making up a negative story about something that happened in a room full of witnesses, then broadcasting it, is defamation?"

    Anyone within a thousand miles of Trump knows what defamation is, probably unwillingly.

    "So why hasn't Trump sued yet, if it didn't happen, and he has dozens of witnesses, including a judge and some prosecutors?"

    Because the story is true, and Habba is doing damage control. Unsuccessfully.

  12. #90092
    The Undying Cthulhu 2020's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Rigging your election
    Posts
    37,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    I bet conservative media are going to freak out any second now about how Trump is sold old and debilitated that he falls asleep in court.


    Annnnnnnnnnnny minute now.
    To be fair, court is boring as fuck. The seats are uncomfortable, there's lots of whispering between lawyers, judges, and clients, there's no music, everyone's quiet and you're not allowed to entertain yourself and they expect you to sit there for 3-5 hours at a time while barely anything happens for 30 minutes at a time.
    “Terrible things are happening outside. Poor helpless people are being dragged out of their homes. Families are torn apart. Men, women, and children are separated. Children come home from school to find that their parents have disappeared.”
    Diary of Anne Frank
    January 13, 1943

  13. #90093
    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhu 2020 View Post
    To be fair, court is boring as fuck. The seats are uncomfortable, there's lots of whispering between lawyers, judges, and clients, there's no music, everyone's quiet and you're not allowed to entertain yourself and they expect you to sit there for 3-5 hours at a time while barely anything happens for 30 minutes at a time.
    Ie, it's literal hell for someone with an attention span as short as Trumps

  14. #90094
    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhu 2020 View Post
    To be fair, court is boring as fuck. The seats are uncomfortable, there's lots of whispering between lawyers, judges, and clients, there's no music, everyone's quiet and you're not allowed to entertain yourself and they expect you to sit there for 3-5 hours at a time while barely anything happens for 30 minutes at a time.
    Grand jury is actually better. You get nice comfy seats, you can ask the witness questions, you learn why certain things are the way they are according to the law, you're in at 10am and sometimes you can be out by 11:30am (the paperwork states 10 to 5). The only downsides is if you get people who ask irrelevant questions who also think they're a trial jury because that's where those questions belong. My current grand jury has 5-8 of these people because they can't be assed to pay attention.
    Just don't reply to me. Please. If you can help it.

  15. #90095
    Quote Originally Posted by Ausr View Post
    My current grand jury has 5-8 of these people because they can't be assed to pay attention.
    Typos and Freudian slips seem related. On another note; Surreal scenes as jurors in New York trial tell Trump what they really think

  16. #90096
    Reforged Gone Wrong The Stormbringer's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Premium
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    ...location, location!
    Posts
    15,545
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowferal View Post
    Typos and Freudian slips seem related. On another note; Surreal scenes as jurors in New York trial tell Trump what they really think
    Anyone who calls him 'President Trump' should be questioned more thoroughly. He isn't the President, he's a former President. Former President Trump would be appropriate and accurate.

  17. #90097
    Again I fail to comprehend the drive to disqualify everyone who has sufficient background knowledge to make a reasoned, informed judgement from the process.

  18. #90098
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    42,469
    Nunes explains how he will save Truth Social.

    We're trying to take the best of Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, TikTok, put it into one app, well we're now going to have the ability for canceled TV programs and or maybe not canceled but maybe not allowed on all the platforms. You'll be able to actually watch television within Truth Social.
    Yep, "taking the best of" all the platforms people actually use.

    Oh, and cancelled TV shows.

    Not only will he somehow do that, but somehow it will make Truth Social worth the billions a company that demonstrably spends ten times what they earn claims to have in value.

    In other words, magic.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Flarelaine View Post
    Again I fail to comprehend the drive to disqualify everyone who has sufficient background knowledge to make a reasoned, informed judgement from the process.
    Normally I would counter with "This is America, even the worst of the worst deserves a fair trial with an unbiased jury".

    The issue here is, people who have no idea about the facts of the case are likely to be Trump supporters. Trump intentionally courts the willfully ill-informed and spouts nothing but lies to them. Therefore "fair" and "unbiased" are at odds in this case.

    The only way this trial will actually be fair is if we brought in people in cryogenic statis since the 1970's.

  19. #90099
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Nunes explains how he will save Truth Social.
    Too many "maybe, maybe not"...s in Nunes' statement.

  20. #90100
    Quote Originally Posted by The Stormbringer View Post
    Anyone who calls him 'President Trump' should be questioned more thoroughly. He isn't the President, he's a former President. Former President Trump would be appropriate and accurate.
    Former Presidents are generally referred to as President tho.

    Bush and Obama are also referred to as President, not Former President.
    It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •