1. #91361
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Cannon's decision seems to be "it's illegal to appoint a Special Counsel".



    In a related story, remember the Trump/Clinton debates when Trump said he would appoint Special Counsel to prosecute Clinton? That's right, the time he promised to jail a political opponent, and got thunderous applause? Turns out, that's only okay when Trump does it.

    I agree with @Edge- this seems like just a delay move. "It's illegal to appoint Special Counsel" flies in the face of history. If it was unConstitutional, it would have come up before. It didn't. Except for Trump.
    Clarence Thomas just recently declared (in the craptastic immunity ruling) that special counsels need to be appointed by Congress and are super whack, yo. Cannon’s new motion is likely her feasting on that tasty bone tossed to her by the most openly corrupt Justice.

    So it’s not just her, the idea came from the tippy-top.

  2. #91362
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Canon's likely gonna get slapped down by the 11th and cry about it or something. It's just another delay and in any functioning government she'd have been impeached for gross incompetence long ago, but she gives Republicans what they want (endless delays and taking ever batshit insane theory of the defense uber-seriously, treating everything as if it's new and novel even if it's not) she's protected for as long as Republicans have at least 38 Senators, I imagine.
    I think it also helps to muddy the waters for people who only get the news from random headlines. For low information voters this just shows Trump being acquitted on a trial and helps push the narrative of "the system is out to get him"

  3. #91363
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    41,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Skjaldborg View Post
    Clarence Thomas just recently declared (in the craptastic immunity ruling) that special counsels need to be appointed by Congress and are super whack, yo. Cannon’s new motion is likely her feasting on that tasty bone tossed to her by the most openly corrupt Justice.

    So it’s not just her, the idea came from the tippy-top.
    Just so we're clear, he's ignoring history, too. Thomas in particular was in office during Ken Starr.

  4. #91364
    Quote Originally Posted by Nymrohd View Post
    I think it also helps to muddy the waters for people who only get the news from random headlines. For low information voters this just shows Trump being acquitted on a trial and helps push the narrative of "the system is out to get him"
    I’d argue the opposite, this was his most obvious open-and-shut case and it pushed the narrative of «we the people have to punish Trump because he’s not getting any consequences for his crimes.»

  5. #91365
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    FUCK EILEEN CANNON. She just fucking dismissed the documents case. She should be removed as a fucking judge. It will be appealed and she should be fucking removed. She dismissed it because she thinks that Jack Smith had to be appointed by the Senate. He doesn't need to be.

    If he needed to be, then the Hunter Biden case needs to be overturned.
    It's probably a good thing overall. I cannot see how Smith won't push to have her removed now.

  6. #91366
    Quote Originally Posted by Skjaldborg View Post
    I’d argue the opposite, this was his most obvious open-and-shut case and it pushed the narrative of «we the people have to punish Trump because he’s not getting any consequences for his crimes.»
    But I am talking about low information voters. People who mostly have caught a headline or two about this and never read a full article, much less cross reference it from more than one source.

  7. #91367
    Donald Trump continues the fight for the American People. Even a bullet to the head doesn't make him relent.

    A true Warrior for his people and his great country.

    He will be an inspiration for generations to come.
    One man's trash is another man's treasure

  8. #91368
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    It isn't alleged, his own classmates confirmed he is a die hard conservative.
    That's the definition of "alleged"
    On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

    - H. L. Mencken

  9. #91369
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    It isn't alleged, his own classmates confirmed he is a die hard conservative.
    Oh that's interesting. Maybe he just hated Trump?

  10. #91370
    I wonder if the timing of Cannon's dismissal is a coincidence or deliberate?

    No better time to try and bury that kind of thing than after the media is focused on a literal assassination attempt, after all.

  11. #91371
    Quote Originally Posted by Drutt View Post
    I wonder if the timing of Cannon's dismissal is a coincidence or deliberate?

    No better time to try and bury that kind of thing than after the media is focused on a literal assassination attempt, after all.
    I'm inclined to say deliberate, but more in that it coincides with the RNC.

  12. #91372
    Quote Originally Posted by Drutt View Post
    I wonder if the timing of Cannon's dismissal is a coincidence or deliberate?

    No better time to try and bury that kind of thing than after the media is focused on a literal assassination attempt, after all.
    More likely it just took her this long to compose the motion after Clarence Thomas gave the go-ahead earlier this month.

  13. #91373
    Merely a Setback Kaleredar's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    phasing...
    Posts
    26,727
    Quote Originally Posted by Nymrohd View Post
    Oh that's interesting. Maybe he just hated Trump?
    It’s possible that he was incensed by Trump attempting to distance himself from project 2025 and viewed it as some sort of “betrayal.”


    Like I said earlier, for as crazy and Trump and the trumpists are, recognize that there are people in the Republican electorate even crazier than that.
    “Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Kaleredar is right...
    Words to live by.

  14. #91374
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    41,111
    J. D. Vance has successfully gotten Trump's attention and is his VP pick.

    I guess he sucked up the hardest. Also, I think we knew that, I think the other high on the list names weren't at his shooting.

    Well, that's the Republican party for you. Their idea of diversity is "our two straight white rich dudes are a few years apart in age".

  15. #91375
    Brewmaster diller's Avatar
    3+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,304
    So that's the Christo-fascist guy that was against Trump originally as I recall - good thing they aren't using some middle-ground candidate VP, shows how dedicated they are to fascism.

  16. #91376
    Quote Originally Posted by Nymrohd View Post
    Oh that's interesting. Maybe he just hated Trump?
    he had a lot of social media stuff about going after the Epstein ring and those files recently came out.

  17. #91377
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Just so we're clear, he's ignoring history, too. Thomas in particular was in office during Ken Starr.
    Is that fact relevant when the Supreme Court has to the power to say "we don't fucking care, our word is law"?
    It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death

  18. #91378
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    41,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorsameth View Post
    Is that fact relevant when the Supreme Court has to the power to say "we don't fucking care, our word is law"?
    Hopefully yes. Cannon's dismissal will be pulled back and eventually appealed to SCOTUS. By then, the election will be over. Either Trump will directly dismiss all the charges against himself, possibly by having Smith executed, or he'll have lost and there'll be no more reason to protect him.

  19. #91379
    So...interesting consequence if Judge Cannon's ruling that "special counsel are unconstitutional unless appointed by the legislature" (which, again, is bullshit).

    Does that mean Hunter Bidens conviction gets tossed? He was investigated by a non-Legislature-appointed special counsel.

  20. #91380
    Banned cubby's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    35,050
    Quote Originally Posted by Drutt View Post
    I wonder if the timing of Cannon's dismissal is a coincidence or deliberate?

    No better time to try and bury that kind of thing than after the media is focused on a literal assassination attempt, after all.
    The media is so focused on the assassination attempt you could shoot someone in time square and get away with it.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    FUCK EILEEN CANNON. She just fucking dismissed the documents case. She should be removed as a fucking judge. It will be appealed and she should be fucking removed. She dismissed it because she thinks that Jack Smith had to be appointed by the Senate. He doesn't need to be.

    If he needed to be, then the Hunter Biden case needs to be overturned.
    She'll be sitting on the Federal Appellate Court if Trump is elected. Possibly SCOTUS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •