See here's where I think the media's own greed could actually do something for good.
I would think "TRUMP BUNGLES INTERVIEW, SAYS OUTRAGEOUS NONSENSE AND SQUIRMS UNDER QUESTIONING, DETAILS WITHIN!" would be a headline and video feed that sells pretty well. Remember, more people have always disliked Trump than liked him. Playing up the "here's Trump being made uncomfortable and bumbling questions" could be an angle that gets clicks pretty readily. Then all the democrats have to do is hop on the back of it and say "ya'll see what this weirdo is saying?"
The "risk" in investing in this is that Trump ceases to do interviews outside of his very safe spaces. But even then, high profile media bodies asking for Trump to give interviews and then either lambasting him for chickening out or could pull 180s on their previous soft-handed interviews and start to grill him, putting his utter incompetency on display for clicks.
The media is fickle. It needs controversy and hearsay to drive clicks. They had their red meat with "Omg Biden is old" and "Omg Biden is facing internal pressure to drop out" but now that that's all out the window they don't really have much to go off from Harris. Trump and Vance are the next easiest targets, and if the narrative of "their a bunch of inarticulate weirdos, come look at their lunacy" is what sells then they could very well pivot to that.