
Cool, but please help me understand how this impacts
Do you think he's right for saying it?Pumping more of California's VERY limited water supply to SoCal Alfalfa farmers
I haven't heard anything more about reports on the lack of water from hydrants, etc.
- - - Updated - - -
It should be incorporated into your knowledge base when you talk about "California's VERY limited water supply" and either California's farmers, or "the drought."

Yes. Where does all that CA tax money go? What an abject failure.
https://x.com/AstorAaron/status/1877064059087949984

Not sure what the delta smelt has to do with the Southern California fires.
As for the Central Valley farmers, since 2022, they have been getting all the water that they asked for and more. They have been getting so much water that for the first time in decades, the ground water in Central Valley went up by 5 feet or more. The story may change if another prolonged drought hit the state. For now, they have all the water that they want.

Nah, just gotta nuke those Hurricanes?
What is that? A hurricane outputs as much energy in 1 minute as a 25 megaton nuke? It does this every single minute? And this is for the average hurricane?
- - - Updated - - -
It goes to poorer states that typically vote Republican. Like a lot of the blue states, they tend to pay out more so that the poorer states can get a handout.
“But this isn’t the end. I promise you, this is not the end, and we have to regroup and we have to continue to fight and continue to work day in and day out to create the better society for our children, for this world, for this country, that we know is possible.” ~~Jon Stewart

Pacific Palisades is a low population density neighborhood. Basically, a bunch of $8M - $10M homes. Even some $30M homes. Pretty low water demand under normal circumstances. The 60 - 80 years old water delivery system is simply not designed for over 100 fire engines pumping 300 - 1,000 gpm during once in a lifetime wildfire event.
Gosh, when you actually like, point out the facts then it doesn't seem remotely outrageous and like it's just a bad situation.
Florida really needs to plan better to not be so severely damaged by hurricanes, after all. Don't they know their whole state is in hurricane territory?
In answering a question about whether or not Trump had some nub of a truth, he said something that fundamentally misunderstands a problem that California has. From how you phrased this post, I think you fully understand the misunderstanding that happened.
Discussion in a forum and pointing out where you think somebody's wrong is natural. Maybe he meant that by reference so some other thing, and I was misunderstanding him.
I don't really know how to interpret "that you can dismiss." Other than maybe a generalized accusation of bad faith. I read more than I specifically reply to, and that shouldn't be taken as dismissing the thing.
This sounds like a job for "infrastructure week"
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
- H. L. Mencken
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
- H. L. Mencken

SoCal farmers having sufficient water for current cultivation has nothing to do with the fact that California has A VERY LIMITED WATER SUPPLY. California's water supply is very dependent on seasonal rainfalls and careful water management.
1. Trump never had a water management plan for California. He just made some vague fucktarded statements to align himself with farmers who were demanding access to the limited water supplies during a specifically bad drought period to continue growing water use intensive crops, environmental damage be damned.
2. The reason why there's no water shortage right now is BECAUSE California ignored the temper tantrums and instead in cooperation with the federal government implemented new water management measures COMBINED with getting actual rainfall. So right now the farmers have their water and the delta hasn't been turned into a swamp.
3. At no point has anyone discussed in the past piping down water so you could fucking soak the LA hills. Like what?
So just like Trump you are either lying or you are moron. Again which?
As some other posters pointed out, I'm getting a little far afield from the wildfires problem into the more general California farmers and periodic California drought problem. If you're on board with that, then fine. It will cross into territory that EdgE might say "just tell him to google it."
Southern California has a remarkably different water situation from Northern California. The north does not have the "A VERY LIMITED WATER SUPPLY" in comparison to the south. They have a relative abundance. When the periodic droughts come, the south of California is particularly affected. That's when it matters to pump the water from the north into the south. The delta smelt was the cause of an issue in the past, where its endangerment affected the supply of water from north to south. Many Californians were pissed off about it.
Not today's problem, but something you should know about if you're intent on making no distinctions about California and "A VERY LIMITED WATER SUPPLY."
Farmers did have a valid gripe in the past. If Trump was both educated knowledgeable and truthful, he'd provide that context and he could make a true critique in that area. Your point (1) is about the protection of a threatened tiny fish that restricted the flow of water from abundance to need. Farmers can absolutely say that the state has the obligation to supply them with the water, and the state's current approach towards endangered species at the source needs reform.1. Trump never had a water management plan for California. He just made some vague fucktarded statements to align himself with farmers who were demanding access to the limited water supplies during a specifically bad drought period to continue growing water use intensive crops, environmental damage be damned.
2. The reason why there's no water shortage right now is BECAUSE California ignored the temper tantrums and instead in cooperation with the federal government implemented new water management measures COMBINED with getting actual rainfall. So right now the farmers have their water and the delta hasn't been turned into a swamp.
3. At no point has anyone discussed in the past piping down water so you could fucking soak the LA hills. Like what?
So just like Trump you are either lying or you are moron. Again which?
For (2), the reason there's no water shortage right now is the rainfall and snowpack.
For (3), I might be with EdgE here and direct you towards googling the LA Aqueduct, and recall that nowhere did I recommend "soak the LA hills." Just recall that there's a basic logic in moving water between water-rich and water-scarce areas that might tick people off the next time we're in a drought.
