[QUOTE=Somewhatconcerned;54621636
Simply abandoning Americans in need is never ok.[/QUOTE]
You willfully supported and voted for someone who did this on purpose. Your "concerns" are handwaved.
What a waste of time and money.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court...no-punishment/
There was a gap from the 15th Century to the early 18th. The Inuit population was not present during that earlier period. Who else has a greater claim?
Again, if you're going to point to the indigenous Inuit population, then you're arguing that USA has no claim to literally anything in the USA, either. Denmark's claim on Greenland is stronger than the USA's to the USA; their initial settlement was into an empty land, rather than one where they had to genocide the indigenous population to make room for European colonization.
You continue to not have any basis whatsoever for your accusation that Denmark's claim is "weak". You just made it up, based on absolutely nothing but your desire to provoke angry responses. You're baiting.
Don't you see republicans are making history, Democrats elected the first black president republicans have elected the first convicted felon / sexual assaulter etc. The party of law and order ladies and gentlemen living for family values LOL. On a serious note maybe just maybe this will force republicans to repeal all these laws that they have that stop felons from voting and have rights but that's a remote chance.
Then you are simply lying.
You have stated your only goal is to lie for rapists, so then your comment can be immediately discounted as another lie.
Why are you lying for rapists?
- - - Updated - - -
You supported a violent coup attempt.
You are fucking lying.
- - - Updated - - -
You are still lying.
You not only found it acceptable, you made a point to lie to cover for it.
- - - Updated - - -
You are still lying.
You supported all of Trump's wasteful spending.
Why do you insist on lying for rapists?
Gonna just skip the rest of the post, because I want to drill down into this blatant projection you've thrown out.
Why would I call disaster victims "garbage"? I'm not Republican, nor am I trying all I can to make an overwhelmingly awful time for people, especially those that actually died, as political as I possibly can.
So, please, why would I ever be calling these poor people "garbage"?
The rest of your post is waffle about my attitude. And yet... this is yours?
You already hit the nail on the head: Projection. They clutch pearls about something that libs might do while ignoring it's literally something that Republicans and/or Donald have already done.
- - - Updated - - -
https://www.npr.org/2025/01/10/g-s1-...north-carolina
The MAGA Hero of Pizzagate is dead. He drew his gun on a cop, pointed it them, refused to drop it, and got shot.A man who fired a gun inside a restaurant in the nation's capital after a fake online conspiracy theory called "Pizzagate" motivated him to do so nearly a decade ago was shot and killed by North Carolina police during a weekend traffic stop.
Edgar Maddison Welch was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by officers in Kannapolis on Saturday night, according to a Kannapolis Police Department news release. One of the officers recognized the car as the vehicle of someone he had arrested and who had an outstanding warrant for a felony probation violation — Welch, police said.
When the officers approached the vehicle to arrest Welch, police said the man pulled out a handgun and pointed it at one of the officers. After he was instructed to drop the weapon but didn't, two officers shot Welch, authorities said.
Yeah. Donald Trump out there on the campaign trail calling the entire country a garbage dumb, but I'm somehow expected to be calling people experiencing probably the worst time of their lives garbage... just because?
The projection could not be any more wild. Probably ties into an earlier post I made, where these people would do exactly that, and they can't imagine anyone not doing the same.
I quoted from an article saying that the problem is worrying about who gets blamed, not the management of risk.
You're making a specific claim, that the personnel were "off fighting uncontrolled wildfires in other places," so I'm sure you have something specific in mind from this last fall that you're just too shy to share. Any rube with an internet connection can make any kinds of assertion that they feel like.
Thank you for agreeing with me that we are not doing enough prescribed burns in CA.
The terrain and climate are excellent reasons to undertake such burns at times of our choosing. It's much better in times such as the fall, than to let an arsonist or negligent random dude light it during a major Santa Ana wind period.
Let's also not forget the insane regulatory hurdles from NEPA and CAA. You can expect 3.6-7.2 years of review before getting one, and something in the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Example article with quotes.
For those worried about budgets, that one sounds ripe for reform and recovering poorly spent money."Although some planning is obviously necessary, Forest Service officials have estimated that improving administrative procedures could shift up to $100 million a year from unnecessary planning to actual project work to restore ecosystems and deliver services on the ground," the agency said in its report.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time." "So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
What's your argument? You've posted some vague sentiments but I don't think you've established that you're a noted expert on Greenland's history or politics.
That's also literally the current state of affairs for a good chunk of the western world, including the USA, you do realize.
Good.
Ashli Babbitt, now this guy. We need more conspiracy theory martyrs. It will make the world a better place without them being able to go online and continue to spew their bullshit lies and delusions.
- - - Updated - - -
Donald Trump the little bitch boy thin skinned piece of cock sucking shit. Fixed it for ya.![]()
Does the USA have a claim over its land? Yes or no.
Because you sure don't seem to have an actual point, or any understanding of how any of these things work.
Until/unless you lay out the universal principles you're applying to discredit Greenland's ownership by Denmark and apply those equally to all territorial claims across the entire world, I have no reason to take you or your arguments seriously. And the only standards you've brought up thus far invalidate the USA as a nation, entirely. Not to mention that it's also a very strong argument that Israel is an invalid nation that should not exist. Weird take from someone who's usually so pro-Israel.
Last edited by Endus; 2025-01-10 at 06:23 PM.