Welcome to the Banana Republic of MMO-Champion, where selective enforcement of the rules, blatant double standards, and moderation not directed at keeping the discussions fair but at policing narratives are the way of life. Of course, this thread will be deleted in a few minutes, instantly perma-banning my account-the moderators pat themselves on the back after another well-executed work of successful censorship.
But before they scramble to delete this, let’s take a deep dive into the staggering level of hypocrisy, bias, and outright corruption within the moderation team—specifically @
Flarelaine & @
Rozz, the political forum moderators, and @
Tziva, who I’ve had multiple conversations with. Buckle up, because we’re about to expose everything.
1. The Moderation Team is a Left-Wing Safe Space
Let me make one thing clear: this forum is not moderated in a fair way. It is moderated to coddle left-wing users and muzzle those who disagree.
✔ Left-leaning posters can do and say anything.
✔ Right-leaning posters get infractions for daring to challenge the narrative.
✔ Personal attacks, obscene comments, and outright harassment are ignored-if they come from the right people.
Who's Responsible? @
Flarelaine & @
Rozz – The political forum moderators who have allowed unchecked rule-breaking by left-wing posters while disproportionately targeting conservative users. @
Tziva – Admitted the forum is poorly moderated, yet does nothing to fix it. @
Edge – A mod who responded to legitimate concerns with “Cool story, bro.” Yes, that is the level of professionalism we’re dealing with.
These biased moderators have made the forum an echo chamber, where only one side can express themselves.
2. The Receipts: Selective Enforcement and Double Standards
This isn't an opinion-this is supported, in fact, by several months of examples of outright hypocrisy in moderation. Let's look at just a few instances:
December 3, 2024 – "Rules? Only When Convenient"
I got an infraction for "baiting", but these comments were left on with no action taken:
@
Doomcookie: "YOU SUPPORT RAPISTS!!! YOU ARE A RAPIST." @
Surfd: calls me a "fukwit." @
fwc577: "Trump's dick is so far down my throat it's coming out my ass."
Multiple reports were ignored. Only after I escalated it to a super moderator did anything happen. How is that fair enforcement?
November 9, 2024 - "Satirical Commentary is a Problem, But Frothing Rants Are Fine"
I posted a satirical take on the economy.
✔ Instant infraction for "word salad."
✔ Meanwhile, others were ranting, calling Trump voters "cultists," and making fact-free emotional arguments.
✔ None of them were moderated.
Explain that one, @
Flarelaine.
November 4, 2024 - "Reporting Rule Breakers Gets YOU Punished"
I reported clear personal attacks, including:
"People who voted for Trump are cultists."
"You support a rapist."
What happened? I got infracted for 'excessive reporting.' Instead of punishment for actual rule-breakers.
✔ You report abuse: YOU are the problem.
✔ Don't report, and that's on you, I suppose.
✔ Actual rule-breakers, post away without problems.
October 14, 2024 – "The AI Infraction That Wasn't"
Infracted over AI-generated content.
✔ A few days later, overturned - because there is no such rule.
✔ They literally issued the punishment first, then realized they had no reason to.
This isn't moderation-this is knee-jerk incompetence at its finest.
3. The Appeals Process is a Joke
If you think the appeal system exists to ensure fairness, you're dead wrong. Here's what actually happens:
✔ 99% of appeals are ignored outright.
✔ The few that get responses are met with copy-paste dismissals.
✔ Moderators never take any blame, no matter how crystal clear the evidence is.
Even Tziva, who at least tries to keep an illusion of professionalism, admitted that moderators don't even have time to enforce the rules fairly.
Okay, so let's put it all into context:
✔ They refuse to consistently enforce the rules.
✔ They refuse to fairly review reports.
✔ They refuse to acknowledge mistakes.
What exactly do these moderators do besides protecting their ideological allies?
4. Edge's Unprofessionalism – A Case Study in Moderator Arrogance
Perhaps one of the most brazen examples of how unserious and biased this moderation team is comes from Edge, a mod who responded to legitimate concerns with:
✔ "Cool story, bro."
Yes, that is a real response from a so-called moderator.
✔ A user points out blatant moderation bias.
✔ The response from the moderation team? Mock them.
If that is the level of professionalism that we get from this forum, no wonder nobody takes it seriously anymore.
5. What's Next?
We all know what is going to happen:
This post will be deleted.
I will be banned.
Flarelaine & Rozz will high-five each other for "handling" the problem.
And in doing so, they will prove every single point I've made.
✔ If they had nothing to hide, this discussion would stay up.
✔ If they were actually fair, they'd enforce rules equally.
✔ If they had self-awareness, they'd acknowledge their own bias.
But instead, they'll delete this post, act like it never happened, and keep doing their selective enforcement like the cowardly, unaccountable mods they are.
6. Why This Forum is Dying
This is not a forum for open discussion; it is a carefully contrived echo chamber in which the rules serve only to police one side of the debate.
✔ If you're Left, say what you will.
✔ If you're Conservative, hound, harass, and infract.
Forums like this die from blatant bias.
Mods are not here to enforce the rules but to protect their viewpoints.
This forum is not fairly moderated; it's moderated to protect one side and silence the other.
This post will likely never be seen because it will be deleted as soon as possible. But everyone who has been watching these double standards in real life already knows the truth.
And that truth is, this forum is about bias enforcement, not rule enforcement.
I will take my ban now from the clown show.