1. #106261
    Quote Originally Posted by Doomcookie View Post
    Boy, Section 230 just had it's way with you.
    If TikTok configured their algorithm to send dangerous content to children, on purpose, would that be protected by Section 230?
    "stop puting you idiotic liberal words into my mouth"
    -ynnady

  2. #106262
    Quote Originally Posted by NineSpine View Post
    If TikTok configured their algorithm to send dangerous content to children, on purpose, would that be protected by Section 230?
    So, for the record, you are saying algorithms are in fact people, correct?

  3. #106263
    Quote Originally Posted by Doomcookie View Post
    So, for the record, you are saying algorithms are in fact people, correct?
    It was a simple question.
    "stop puting you idiotic liberal words into my mouth"
    -ynnady

  4. #106264
    Quote Originally Posted by NineSpine View Post
    It was a simple question.
    I asked mine multiple times, for hours.

    I'll wait.

  5. #106265
    Quote Originally Posted by Doomcookie View Post
    I asked mine multiple times, for hours.

    I'll wait.
    No, and your question is a great example of how your goal is to waste time with horseshit.
    "stop puting you idiotic liberal words into my mouth"
    -ynnady

  6. #106266
    Quote Originally Posted by NineSpine View Post
    No, and your question is a great example of how your goal is to waste time with horseshit.
    So, you made that distinction. They are not people, and therefore...

    Now, this is exactly why I previously asked for the most relevant lawsuits, to about all your foolish shenanigans.

  7. #106267
    Can you two take it to DM's or something? Or create a Section 230 thread?

  8. #106268
    Quote Originally Posted by Doomcookie View Post
    So, you made that distinction. They are not people, and therefore...

    Now, this is exactly why I previously asked for the most relevant lawsuits, to about all your foolish shenanigans.
    They are not people and therefore nothing.

    The most relevant lawsuit is Anderson v TikTok which roundly agreed with me.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Can you two take it to DM's or something? Or create a Section 230 thread?
    It wouldn't take up this much space if he didn't spend 90% of his posts showboating and trolling.
    "stop puting you idiotic liberal words into my mouth"
    -ynnady

  9. #106269
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Can you two take it to DM's or something? Or create a Section 230 thread?
    Yep.

    Will do.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by NineSpine View Post
    They are not people and therefore nothing.

    The most relevant lawsuit is Anderson v TikTok which roundly agreed with me.

    - - - Updated - - -



    It wouldn't take up this much space if he didn't spend 90% of his posts showboating and trolling.
    I agree with your assertion that Trump is a fascist. I disagree with your attempts to blame Democrats for pointing out that he"a a fascist.

  10. #106270
    Quote Originally Posted by Doomcookie View Post
    Yep.

    Will do.

    - - - Updated - - -

    I agree with your assertion that Trump is a fascist. I disagree with your attempts to blame Democrats for pointing out that he"a a fascist.
    Good thing I never "blamed Democrats" for that. I don't even know what that means.
    "stop puting you idiotic liberal words into my mouth"
    -ynnady

  11. #106271
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    83,665
    Quote Originally Posted by NineSpine View Post
    No, it isn't. The idea that publisher means "human did it" and platform means "computer did it" is ridiculous and has no basis in the law.
    You could've just admitted you've never read the law and don't understand it.

    But I guess we're here where you deny the plain facts straight to my face, even with a link to the primary source proving you wrong


  12. #106272
    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    You could've just admitted you've never read the law and do t understand it.

    But I guess we're here where you deny the plain facts straight to my face, even with a link to the primary source proving you wrong
    Quote the portion of the law that says actions taken by humans are distinct from actions taken via algorithm.

    This should be very straightforward, since the relevant portion of 230 is less than 30 words.
    "stop puting you idiotic liberal words into my mouth"
    -ynnady

  13. #106273

  14. #106274
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasulis View Post
    This is going to cost so much fucking money, holy shit.

  15. #106275
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    This is going to cost so much fucking money, holy shit.
    In a perverse way, it makes sense. The US is currently being run by businessmen who make their decisions based strictly on dollars and cents. Factors such as humanity and compassion have no place in their decision-making process.

  16. #106276
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    23,005
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasulis View Post
    And just like that, the U.S. will also quickly be becoming a gas station with nukes. Throwing away all that influence and soft power for... a quick buck? Not even, it'll be more expensive to close down the consulates....

  17. #106277
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasulis View Post
    In a perverse way, it makes sense. The US is currently being run by businessmen who make their decisions based strictly on dollars and cents. Factors such as humanity and compassion have no place in their decision-making process.
    I mean, not just the human cost.

    But this is going to cost an incredible amount of money in the short and longterm.

  18. #106278
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    83,665
    Quote Originally Posted by NineSpine View Post
    Quote the portion of the law that says actions taken by humans are distinct from actions taken via algorithm.

    This should be very straightforward, since the relevant portion of 230 is less than 30 words.
    I already quoted it to you. You ignored it, because you're not engaging honestly.

    The term “information content provider” means any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service

    Bolded to help you. Note that "entity" refers to corporations, not software. Literally the definition of "information content provider". Also check (c)(1) if that's not enough for you, or follow the link in the definition on the page to figure out what "person" means.
    Last edited by Endus; 2025-04-15 at 11:38 PM.


  19. #106279
    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    I already quoted it to you. You ignored it, because you're not engaging honestly.

    The term “information content provider” means any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service

    Bolded to help you. Note that "entity" refers to corporations, not software.
    Under your logic, when a person programs a computer to do something, this means they are not "responsible, in whole or in part" for what the program does? This is the hill you want to die on? That I can program a computer to take any action I want and I am not responsible for it?
    Last edited by NineSpine; 2025-04-15 at 11:40 PM.
    "stop puting you idiotic liberal words into my mouth"
    -ynnady

  20. #106280
    The Unstoppable Force Evil Midnight Bomber's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    21,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    And just like that, the U.S. will also quickly be becoming a gas station with nukes. Throwing away all that influence and soft power for... a quick buck? Not even, it'll be more expensive to close down the consulates....
    Not too mention how expensive it will be when they figure out wha ta bad decision that was and have to re-open them.
    On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

    - H. L. Mencken

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •