1. #106901
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    You know those authoritarians, and their crackdowns on foreign spending in elections.

    Dems are going to say that foreign donations to American political campaigns are the foundation to Democracy now, aren’t they.

    https://nypost.com/2024/10/28/us-new...s-house-panel/
    In the news for a while for failing to verify donor identity, and until recently, refusing to require CVV card info.
    Concern trolling about foreign money in elections, while defending the guy that:

    1. Openly asked Russia to illegally interfere in the election.
    2. Demanded political favors from Zelensky in exchange for congressionally appropriated funds.
    3. Made at least $7M from foreign governments during his last administration.
    4. Appointed his son in law to be in charge of MidEast policy, who then received a billion dollar investment from Saudi Arabia.
    5. Sent his daughter to negotiate with China while she was negotiating business deals with the Chinese government.

    Spare us.
    Last edited by NineSpine; 2025-04-24 at 03:58 PM.

  2. #106902
    Quote Originally Posted by Fugus View Post
    Wasn’t sure if the courts could actually try a say if he did and was sued for it.

    Like “we are sending troops to position x for reason y” followed by “we are sending troops to position x for reason z” right afterwards.
    Look at Trump ignoring multiple court orders, including the SC, and tell me about the courts stopping the President from doing a thing.
    It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death

  3. #106903
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hegseth...lled-pentagon/

    Hegseth orders makeup studio installed at Pentagon
    Lights, Camera, FABULOUS!

    Women in the military, especially leadership, is too woke. But installing a hair and makeup studio at the Pentagon? That's extremely masculine. I'm glad Secretary Alcoholic is continuing to focus on the most pressing issues for the US military - how good he looks on camera.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Flarelaine View Post
    I choose to think of this as a version of Marvel's mutant registry. We'd be in illustrious company. For a while anyway.

    it's just wild how explicitly Nazi so much of the shit this administration is doing, innit?

  4. #106904
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    44,005
    Quote Originally Posted by NineSpine View Post
    Concern trolling about foreign money in elections, while defending the guy that:

    2. Demanded political favors from Zelensky in exchange for congressionally appropriated funds.
    Oh, right, the first time he was impeached! Yeah, willing to bet that @tehdang said nothing, but even if he had, the Republican Party circled the wagons and allowed it. Therefore, since demanding foreign contributions at figurative gunpoint is fine, declaring them illegal when Democrats ask for donations would just be flat-out hypocrisy.

    But then again, look who it is.

  5. #106905
    ok at this point i'm convinced the whole thing is legit just money laundering and nothing else. i don't think there's anything like this kind of "organic" interest even amongst cultists. this is bitcoin 2.0, but more obvious and dumber.

  6. #106906
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    44,005
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Lights, Camera, FABULOUS!
    I'm pretty sure the makeup room is for Trump. Hegseth knows Trump is, well, an old fat dying man. They need to slather him with orange pancake makeup so he doesn't look like the villain from Men in Black.

  7. #106907
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorsameth View Post
    Look at Trump ignoring multiple court orders, including the SC, and tell me about the courts stopping the President from doing a thing.
    Wasn’t saying they would stop him, just that they would try to rule against him. We are already in constitutional crisis mode where they are trying to split hairs to claim they aren’t and avoiding doing something about it.

  8. #106908
    Quote Originally Posted by NineSpine View Post
    Concern trolling about foreign money in elections, while defending the guy that:

    1. Openly asked Russia to illegally interfere in the election.
    2. Demanded political favors from Zelensky in exchange for congressionally appropriated funds.
    3. Made at least $7M from foreign governments during his last administration.
    4. Appointed his son in law to be in charge of MidEast policy, who then received a billion dollar investment from Saudi Arabia.
    5. Sent his daughter to negotiate with China while she was negotiating business deals with the Chinese government.

    Spare us.
    it's very funny

    because he posts some NYP article about dems being duped

    meanwhile the donald administration gave credentials to tim pool to show up to the white house as press, a guy who was literally a paid russian propagandist who fits every aspect of the 'useful idiot' definition because apparently reasonable people don't question where the tens of thousands of dollars they're being paid to repeat russian propaganda is coming from.

    it's very funny to see republicans always projecting with their accusations. because every time it ends up being them doing what they complain about. see: george soros complaints but elon is literally what conservatives have spent decades antisemetically attacking george soros for.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    I'm pretty sure the makeup room is for Trump. Hegseth knows Trump is, well, an old fat dying man. They need to slather him with orange pancake makeup so he doesn't look like the villain from Men in Black.
    when was the last time donald got his fat ass shuttled over to the pentagon in a golf cart? i can't remember, i don't think it's for him. it seems to be for pete, who is used to things like having someone for hair and makeup and is upset at losing those creature comforts alongside his morning cocktails which is also hasn't given up

  9. #106909
    Quote Originally Posted by Xath View Post
    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/0...andum-00307251

    This definitely isn't in the authoritarian playbook /s
    However, how are they going to enforce it seeing as there is another EO that basically stops the enforcement of said things.

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/president...onal-security/

  10. #106910
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    44,005
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    it's very funny to see republicans always projecting with their accusations.
    Not just projecting, but desperately trying to "both sides" while equating a parking ticket with a school shooting. "It's okay that Trump has untracable TrumpCoin, because ActBlue is accused of not checking CVV once or twice".

  11. #106911
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Oh, right, the first time he was impeached! Yeah, willing to bet that @tehdang said nothing, but even if he had, the Republican Party circled the wagons and allowed it. Therefore, since demanding foreign contributions at figurative gunpoint is fine, declaring them illegal when Democrats ask for donations would just be flat-out hypocrisy.

    But then again, look who it is.
    It's a pretty tired playbook at this point:

    1. Identify something that is a genuine problem.
    2. Overstate how much it is a problem through fear mongering.
    3. Propose a solution that conveniently only targets your political opponents.
    4. The left complains.
    5. Accuse the left of not caring about the genuine problem.

    Look at voter ID for the template:

    1. Identify something that is a genuine problem: Election security.
    2. Overstate how much it is a problem through fear mongering: MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS ARE VOTING
    3. Propose a solution that conveniently only targets your political opponents: So that's why we need voter ID, but we refuse to give the ID out for free, and we will only accept the IDs our supporters are likely to have, and coincidentally we are closing DMVs in minority areas too
    4. The left complains
    5. Accuse the left of not caring about the genuine problem: Why don't you support election security?

    For another example, look at immigration:

    1. Identify something that is a genuine problem: Immigration has become a mess
    2. Overstate how much it is a problem through fear mongering: WE ARE BEING INVADED BY HORDES OF GANG MEMBERS
    3. Propose a solution that conveniently only targets your political opponents: So that's why we need to target latino communities for scrutiny and scare them out of coming or staying here.
    4. The left complains
    5. Accuse the left of not caring about the genuine problem: Why don't you care about immigration issues?

    At least with immigration the Democrats called their bluff by supporting an immigration bill to rectify a huge part of the problem, but Republicans opposed it, because solved problems can't be fear mongered on.
    Last edited by NineSpine; 2025-04-24 at 04:12 PM.

  12. #106912
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    You know those authoritarians, and their crackdowns on foreign spending in elections.

    Dems are going to say that foreign donations to American political campaigns are the foundation to Democracy now, aren’t they.

    https://nypost.com/2024/10/28/us-new...s-house-panel/
    In the news for a while for failing to verify donor identity, and until recently, refusing to require CVV card info.
    The problem isn't they are trying to stop foreign donations(which shouldn't be a thing anyway). It is they are specifically going to target a democrat or liberal leaning donation platform. Why not also go after republican or conservative donation platforms along with it? Because, otherwise, that is what lawfare actually looks like. The notion that one side is excused from it while the other side isn't. That is what a 2 tier justice system looks like.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Fugus View Post
    Wasn’t saying they would stop him, just that they would try to rule against him. We are already in constitutional crisis mode where they are trying to split hairs to claim they aren’t and avoiding doing something about it.
    When it comes to the WPA, I believe the courts wouldn't be able to do much seeing as it would be following the act to the letter. It is up to Congress to prevent the abuse if it were to be used that way. It isn't like the States themselves would be able to sue to prevent going to war seeing as they cannot declare war themselves, only the Federal Government can. And the States would have to show standing and show harm done, which as far as I can tell, that would be near impossible.

    So who would be able to sue to have the courts rule to have an injunction on it? Because the Courts themselves cannot bring up any suit as they are, for the most part, a neutral arbiter.

  13. #106913
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    ok at this point i'm convinced the whole thing is legit just money laundering and nothing else. i don't think there's anything like this kind of "organic" interest even amongst cultists. this is bitcoin 2.0, but more obvious and dumber.
    This is just another way to keep the liquidity high as the lockout period is expiring Trump and co can finally cash out.

    Hegseth orders makeup studio installed at Pentagon
    Holy shit this is real when I heard about it, I thought it was a onion article.

  14. #106914
    Quote Originally Posted by gondrin View Post
    The problem isn't they are trying to stop foreign donations(which shouldn't be a thing anyway). It is they are specifically going to target a democrat or liberal leaning donation platform. Why not also go after republican or conservative donation platforms along with it? Because, otherwise, that is what lawfare actually looks like. The notion that one side is excused from it while the other side isn't. That is what a 2 tier justice system looks like.

    - - - Updated - - -



    When it comes to the WPA, I believe the courts wouldn't be able to do much seeing as it would be following the act to the letter. It is up to Congress to prevent the abuse if it were to be used that way. It isn't like the States themselves would be able to sue to prevent going to war seeing as they cannot declare war themselves, only the Federal Government can. And the States would have to show standing and show harm done, which as far as I can tell, that would be near impossible.

    So who would be able to sue to have the courts rule to have an injunction on it? Because the Courts themselves cannot bring up any suit as they are, for the most part, a neutral arbiter.
    because it is lawfare, the very thing republicans spent the past four years complaining democrats were doing because literally everything is always projection with republicans and it's fucking boring and pathetic

    - - - Updated - - -

    The art of the deal in action!

    Why didn't Sleepy Joe Biden try the strategy of "begging Putin over social media to please end his war."? It's just so brilliant it won't work!

  15. #106915
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    44,005
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    when was the last time donald got his fat ass shuttled over to the pentagon in a golf cart?

  16. #106916
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    oh, last term

    for a very obvious photo-op.

    those cables are a mess, they need to hire some better IT

  17. #106917
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    You know those authoritarians, and their crackdowns on foreign spending in elections.

    Dems are going to say that foreign donations to American political campaigns are the foundation to Democracy now, aren’t they.

    https://nypost.com/2024/10/28/us-new...s-house-panel/
    In the news for a while for failing to verify donor identity, and until recently, refusing to require CVV card info.
    You linked the post ...

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    oh, last term

    for a very obvious photo-op.

    those cables are a mess, they need to hire some better IT
    The cables are fine I'm assuming those are linked into an internal network and those laptops have wifi disabled completely.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by gondrin View Post
    However, how are they going to enforce it seeing as there is another EO that basically stops the enforcement of said things.

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/president...onal-security/
    That EO obviously won't apply to democratic fund raising duh

  18. #106918
    Quote Originally Posted by gondrin View Post
    The problem isn't they are trying to stop foreign donations(which shouldn't be a thing anyway). It is they are specifically going to target a democrat or liberal leaning donation platform. Why not also go after republican or conservative donation platforms along with it? Because, otherwise, that is what lawfare actually looks like. The notion that one side is excused from it while the other side isn't. That is what a 2 tier justice system looks like.
    When there’s been troubling news stories in the past year and they only recently started implementing CVV verification recently, I think it’s justified. In fact, I would hope that a Harris administration would do the same thing. Alongside a long investigation into the people perpetrating fraudulent donations under certain FEC limits of scrutiny, that have been abusing the weak system in place. See previous link.

    [

  19. #106919
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    44,005
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    Translated: it's okay when we do it
    No, that means you've accepted it, therefore, any further protest is considered disingenuous due to your own words and actions.

  20. #106920
    I love the double game that the administration is playing in the Abrego Garcia case. One one side, they pretend to care for his wife on the other in their efforts to win a pr campaign they force her to a safe house as they blast her info to millions of people.

    "Its all public information that anyone can find". Sure. The millions of eyes you put into it have no effect tho xd

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •