1. #108241
    Dreadlord Mazza's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    the land of beer, chocolate and waffles
    Posts
    812
    In the wake of the Trump admins Birthright Citizenship courtcases, the Supreme Courts looks at Trumps lawyers claim that the decisions none SC federal judges take can only be applied to the people bringing the case as opposed to being upheld nationwide.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/14/p...nd-term-agenda

    Which is bananas. In case of the birthright citizinship for instance, the administrations claim is that only children with at least one parent being a natural born US citizen or a legal permanent resident in the US as opposed to every child born in the US (barring some exceptions like children of diplomats) I would guess that there's ppl that are affected by that in every federal court district in the US. The amount of courtcases that would need to be had would get insane while they probably would all end up with the same result (the judges telling the executive that they are really bad at interpreting the constitution) until the SC rules on the matter itself.

  2. #108242
    Elemental Lord Poopymonster's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Neverland Ranch Survivor
    Posts
    8,386
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazza View Post
    In the wake of the Trump admins Birthright Citizenship courtcases, the Supreme Courts looks at Trumps lawyers claim that the decisions none SC federal judges take can only be applied to the people bringing the case as opposed to being upheld nationwide.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/14/p...nd-term-agenda

    Which is bananas. In case of the birthright citizinship for instance, the administrations claim is that only children with at least one parent being a natural born US citizen or a legal permanent resident in the US as opposed to every child born in the US (barring some exceptions like children of diplomats) I would guess that there's ppl that are affected by that in every federal court district in the US. The amount of courtcases that would need to be had would get insane while they probably would all end up with the same result (the judges telling the executive that they are really bad at interpreting the constitution) until the SC rules on the matter itself.
    Yes that's the point. Slow it down and then they do what they want. In the interim between "kidnap and expel citizens" and judge says "Stop that shit", lots of people they determine as Undesirable have been sent to some hellhole prison.
    Repeat.
    When ordered to bring them back, stall, appeal, flat out don't. Draw it out further. Do everything BUT bring them back.
    Make the process painful.
    Make people fearful.
    Quote Originally Posted by Crissi View Post
    Quit using other posters as levels of crazy. That is not ok


    If you look, you can see the straw man walking a red herring up a slippery slope coming to join this conversation.

  3. #108243
    Quote Originally Posted by Azadina View Post
    No one is going to civil war over minority rights. It's the deep descent into Nazism option.
    They won't for minority rights, they will if republicans take away their porn. The bill basically attacks distributors of pornography in general which would basically ban all porn sites from the US under fear of prosecution. Aside from Christian nut jobs on the right most Americans would see it as a step too far and they aren't smart enough to know how to work a VPN.

  4. #108244
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    23,129
    Quote Originally Posted by Draco-Onis View Post
    They won't for minority rights, they will if republicans take away their porn. The bill basically attacks distributors of pornography in general which would basically ban all porn sites from the US under fear of prosecution. Aside from Christian nut jobs on the right most Americans would see it as a step too far and they aren't smart enough to know how to work a VPN.
    I doubt it, a couple southern states implemented porn laws that made Pornhub withdraw from those states entirely, and we haven't heard a peep. While yes I'll agree there are plenty of other options still available within those states, Americans are very good at being complacent and letting their freedoms be chipped away at.
    There would not be a mass upheaval if porn were to be federally banned, at best it'd be Prohibition 2.0 where everyone would know where and how to get it, and besides some performative arrests targeting easy culprits, the law would generally turn a blind eye.

  5. #108245
    Merely a Setback Kaleredar's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    phasing...
    Posts
    28,474
    Hmm, yet more rights previously established by the constitution at risk of being eroded by a far-right aligned Supreme Court…

    If only we could have elected presidents at certain times to have ensured that the composition of the Supreme Court wouldn’t be turned into a bunch of far right sycophants, and that that alone would have been important enough to vote for someone some might otherwise have found “just kinda boring”

    Oh well!
    “Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Kaleredar is right...
    Words to live by.

  6. #108246
    I watch Fox news cuz I am a masochist and it lets me keep myself grounded on what conservatives believe. And I have been noticing an uptick of conservatives arguing that giving immigrants a trial would be to bothersome? And some even implying that they do not need to since Obama and Clinton did it without trial. And like???

    Conservatives (who actually hate America since they dont want to respect any of Americas founding values) are trying to build a case that they do not respect due process.

  7. #108247
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rfk-jr-...stion-hearing/



    In which the head of HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES openly states nobody should be taking medical advice from him despite the fact that he heads a health department for a nation.

    But "DEI hires" are the problem.

    Wild there's still not a peep from that crowd about this unqualified shitgibbon who ignores public warnings and takes his family to bathe in waters contaminated by human waste - https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/pol...ria-rcna206416



    Wonder how many more kids will die of measles because our HHS Secretary who once almost ate roadkill bear cut doesn't believe in vaccines.
    To be fair, he said for people to not take medical advice from him. He has every right to take a risk and swim in that stream if he wants. He never advocated for you to do so.

    And just because a body of water is contaminated doesn't mean it is uniformly so. There are invariably cleaner areas than others. Again, RFK Jr swimming in that creek has zero impact on our day to day lives.

  8. #108248
    Elemental Lord Poopymonster's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Neverland Ranch Survivor
    Posts
    8,386
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    I doubt it, a couple southern states implemented porn laws that made Pornhub withdraw from those states entirely, and we haven't heard a peep. While yes I'll agree there are plenty of other options still available within those states, Americans are very good at being complacent and letting their freedoms be chipped away at.
    There would not be a mass upheaval if porn were to be federally banned, at best it'd be Prohibition 2.0 where everyone would know where and how to get it, and besides some performative arrests targeting easy culprits, the law would generally turn a blind eye.
    You bet your ass BBC would be a prime target.
    Quote Originally Posted by Crissi View Post
    Quit using other posters as levels of crazy. That is not ok


    If you look, you can see the straw man walking a red herring up a slippery slope coming to join this conversation.

  9. #108249
    Quote Originally Posted by Somewhatconcerned View Post
    To be fair, he said for people to not take medical advice from him. He has every right to take a risk and swim in that stream if he wants. He never advocated for you to do so.

    And just because a body of water is contaminated doesn't mean it is uniformly so. There are invariably cleaner areas than others. Again, RFK Jr swimming in that creek has zero impact on our day to day lives.
    I'd say "I take it you're not a fan of leading by example, then" but we already know, man.
    confirmed by my uncle nitnendo and masahiro samurai

  10. #108250
    Quote Originally Posted by Azadina View Post
    No one is going to civil war over minority rights. It's the deep descent into Nazism option.
    Thing is they want to make this a death penalty it's like making jaywalking a death penalty something that basically everyone has done at some point in their life that they can employ at will. That might actually be enough to cause a revolution.

  11. #108251
    Quote Originally Posted by Somewhatconcerned View Post
    To be fair, he said for people to not take medical advice from him.
    What's his job, again? What department does he run?

    Quote Originally Posted by Somewhatconcerned View Post
    He has every right to take a risk and swim in that stream if he wants. He never advocated for you to do so.
    Unsurprisingly, "Lead by example" appears to be a foreign concept.

    Also ignoring the risk he put his grandchildren in for literally no reason because having the head of a health department ignore health warnings from professionals is a great look.

    Quote Originally Posted by Somewhatconcerned View Post
    And just because a body of water is contaminated doesn't mean it is uniformly so.
    Oh jesus this reminds me of that other time you had quite possibly the worst take on the internet on a topic and now I'm trying to remember what it was.

    Like do you even think before posting this? This doesn't seem like you thought about this before posting it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Somewhatconcerned View Post
    There are invariably cleaner areas than others. Again, RFK Jr swimming in that creek has zero impact on our day to day lives.
    oh honey you're so desperate for a win it's sad

  12. #108252
    Titan TACOshake's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Shitposting for PROP 50
    Posts
    11,584
    Ongoing in: Most incompetent Administration in History
    The plane being a White Elephant gift is the funniest turn this saga could have taken.

    Forbes: The Qataris have been trying to get rid of that ostentatious luxury jet for five years, but no one would buy it. It costs too much to fly, costs more to maintain, and needs too big a landing strip. They had another one they unloaded on Turkey.
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeremyb...tar-747-trump/

    While many have speculated that the Qataris have offered Trump the luxurious plane to curry favor with the famously transactional president, there may be a simpler rationale: they just don’t want it anymore.

    The royals have failed to sell the plane, which was put on the market in 2020, according to an archived listing. Giving it away could save Qatar’s rulers a big chunk of change on maintenance and storage costs, aviation experts told Forbes. Making Trump happy would be an added bonus.

    Qatar, which has given away another blinged-out 747 and may have mothballed two more, epitomizes the fading demand for these huge, fuel-guzzling, highly personalized airplanes. There aren’t many who want to buy them, and many of the governments and royal families who own them have been trying to ditch them over the past decade.

  13. #108253
    Quote Originally Posted by Milchshake View Post
    Ongoing in: Most incompetent Administration in History
    The plane being a White Elephant gift is the funniest turn this saga could have taken.

    Forbes: The Qataris have been trying to get rid of that ostentatious luxury jet for five years, but no one would buy it. It costs too much to fly, costs more to maintain, and needs too big a landing strip. They had another one they unloaded on Turkey.
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeremyb...tar-747-trump/

    While many have speculated that the Qataris have offered Trump the luxurious plane to curry favor with the famously transactional president, there may be a simpler rationale: they just don’t want it anymore.

    The royals have failed to sell the plane, which was put on the market in 2020, according to an archived listing. Giving it away could save Qatar’s rulers a big chunk of change on maintenance and storage costs, aviation experts told Forbes. Making Trump happy would be an added bonus.

    Qatar, which has given away another blinged-out 747 and may have mothballed two more, epitomizes the fading demand for these huge, fuel-guzzling, highly personalized airplanes. There aren’t many who want to buy them, and many of the governments and royal families who own them have been trying to ditch them over the past decade.
    lmao donald got regifted what nobody wanted and is so stoked by it

    truly the most easily manipulated man in the world

  14. #108254
    So, speaking of HHS, they are rehiring about 300 employees that they fired.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/oth...e41b7574&ei=49

    The Department of Health and Human Services on Tuesday reinstated 328 federal employees who faced terminations, including those involved in screening for “black lung” disease in coal miners and for health issues in 9/11 first responders.

    The reinstated employees are part of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), a division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that is focused on preventing and responding to work-related illnesses.
    There is more but that is the pertinent part of it. If I were any of those employees, I would really think long and hard about going to work for this administration. Because they have shown, time and time again, that they are just going to fire people because they want to, not because of any specific reason like a contract ending or something similar.

  15. #108255
    Quote Originally Posted by gondrin View Post
    So, speaking of HHS, they are rehiring about 300 employees that they fired.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/oth...e41b7574&ei=49



    There is more but that is the pertinent part of it. If I were any of those employees, I would really think long and hard about going to work for this administration. Because they have shown, time and time again, that they are just going to fire people because they want to, not because of any specific reason like a contract ending or something similar.
    Casual reminder for some in the thread:

    Firing and re-hiring people you fired is incredibly expensive and wasteful.

  16. #108256
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Casual reminder for some in the thread:

    Firing and re-hiring people you fired is incredibly expensive and wasteful.
    This happens when you have idiots trying to run the country like it's a fortune 500 company and they weren't even good CEOs when they where doing just that.

  17. #108257
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Casual reminder for some in the thread:

    Firing and re-hiring people you fired is incredibly expensive and wasteful.
    What republican voters don't get is government jobs are highly competitive purely due to stability if you take that away very few people will be willing to take the lower salaries.

  18. #108258
    Elemental Lord Poopymonster's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Neverland Ranch Survivor
    Posts
    8,386
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Casual reminder for some in the thread:

    Firing and re-hiring people you fired is incredibly expensive and wasteful.
    "Am I returning at my previous seniority/salary or are you rehiring me as a new hire?"
    That is a very important question.
    Quote Originally Posted by Crissi View Post
    Quit using other posters as levels of crazy. That is not ok


    If you look, you can see the straw man walking a red herring up a slippery slope coming to join this conversation.

  19. #108259
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/kid-ro...mps-ice-raids/

    Even Kid Rock knows that the ICE raids are bullshit since he closed his restaurant to avoid an ICE raid.

  20. #108260
    The Unstoppable Force Kathandira's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ziltoidia 9
    Posts
    20,719
    Quote Originally Posted by Somewhatconcerned View Post
    44% in this day and age of polarization is pretty good! Will probably continue to slowly uptick. And still way more popular than Dems.
    Dope, so you openly admit that Joe Biden had pretty good approval rates? 54% by this time in 2021. Which is 10% higher than Trump at this time.

    https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/...joe-biden.aspx

    You really are one dumb bastard.
    RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18

    Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •