Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
I don't think anybody took Amalaric's post seriously. A united ireland would be a solution but it's not going to happened (the RoI can't throw enough cash at it to keep it alive and peaceful). A Scottish referendum might happen, but who knows when. It's all vague, remote, wishful thinking. He could have added a line about Sheila, Queen of Scotts, the Usurper, Mother of Seahorses taking over the Kindgdom, and it wouldn't make it more worth discussing.
I took offense with Dribsky and replied to Shalcksky. That's it.
I
I don't doubt that Macron isnt leaving the deal. However if the French gain a more Le Pen like administration after the next election, the chances of the deal getting scrapped is far more likely. Let's not forget that this deal is far more beneficial to the UK than it is to France, and in a scenario where the UK is not part of the Dublin convention, France would be in a place where they could let migrants pass through.
In the end, "getting back control of the border" could very likely backfire tremendously.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Well, it would be a pretty amazing strategy for destroying the UK utterly:
27 capitals nuked means 27 US embassies destroyed. Tens of thousands of business-people, students and tourists - US citizens all - slaughtered with weapons of mass destruction. It would a piece of hard work for the doves in the US congress to prevent the hawks from turning London in to a glow-in-the-dark parking lot in retaliation, and just settle for total enforced disarmament and a nice war-crimes tribunal.
Let me stop you right here. This is just a mad fantasy. It will never happen. It's foolish to start talking like that. The British are our friends and they will remain our friends, whether they are in the EU or not. Killers and sociopaths like Dribbles don't matter. He's an insignificant minority. He does not represent anyone but the lunatics and anarchists.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Certainly. Just thought I'd point out that once again Dribbles didn't think through his little power fantasies.
I have no wish to see the UK as a whole come to harm, nor for that matter most Brexiteers - history's judgement will suffice there.
My point is that migrants that leave for the UK won't be Frances problem anymore, as they would be while the UK is part of the EU. Migrant camps were an example of them being stuck in France and being France's problem regardless if they made it to the UK or not, but this will be an issue for migrants in generel.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8745121.html
Add Macrons worsen public ratings and a more right orientated President isnt unimaginable. Sorry if you fail to see the bigger picture, well not sorry but /shrug.
Your point was and continues to be wrong. The current UK/France border arrangements are a result of a bilateral agreement between France and the UK which is independent of the EU and will continue regardless of the UK's EU membership until either country gives notice of its intention to cancel this agreement.
Macron's (lack of) popularity has nothing to do with your original point nor does his ratings make your point correct. Bigger picture!?! Don't make me laugh!
Highlighting one word in my post doesn't suddenly make your nonsense point any less nonsense.
Dublin III Regulation is designed to establish which member state is responsible for processing the asylum claim which should be the first member state where the asylum seeker entered the EU. As such a member state is under no obligation to process an illegal immigrant's asylum claim and they are free return the asylum seeker to the member state where they first entered the EU. It does not mean that several member states can allow illegal immigrants to pass through them on route to the UK and then absolve their responsibilities when the UK refuses entry.
Last edited by Pann; 2019-04-22 at 08:11 AM.
Thanks for that long irrelevant post. The UK is leaving the EU remember. That hightlighted word were a helping hand in the perspective of my post. Which were an extension of a long list of ‘what if’s’, yet you prefered to nitpick on a small part of a post apparently taken out of a longer context.
Last edited by Crispin; 2019-04-22 at 09:19 AM.
I agree. The issue as it stands with the Calais migrant camps is a joint issue (or at least supposed to be). It won't be that way for much longer, or at least it will become a lot more complicated. However people think they are sticking one in the eye of Johnny Foreigner, land of hope and glory and all of that jazz, so just now I don't imagine too many people care about that at this moment in time.