1. #14621
    The Insane Masark's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    17,973
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowferal View Post
    Omg...

    https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1097652491926130688

    I've been doing federal criminal law for 24 years and I've never seen anything like this. This is not normal.

    He filed an apology...that's not even a thing...
    "I prosecuted a dude who thought he didn't have to pay taxes because he was a Natural Constitutional Man or some shit and who thought I was part of a black-helicopter UN conspiracy and he was, like, FAR more normal and sensible than this gang of imbeciles."

    Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
    What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mind
    Quote Originally Posted by Howard Tayler
    Political conservatism is just atavism with extra syllables and a necktie.
    Me on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW characters

  2. #14622
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Wait, that can't be right. (checks source) Sorry, that's T. S. Ellis. My bad.
    With all those hollow men in this sad story, the mistake is easily explained.

    And that final stanza is very apt to describe those same guys wailing and flailing to avoid prison.

  3. #14623
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowferal View Post
    Omg...

    https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1097652491926130688

    I've been doing federal criminal law for 24 years and I've never seen anything like this. This is not normal.

    He filed an apology...that's not even a thing...
    Presumably because if some lunatic had taken it upon themselves to attack her (or does in the future), his lawyers obviously want to distance him from it as much as possible. The moron seems to be in enough trouble without adding a blatant incitement to violence on top of everything.

  4. #14624
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    The New Republic article goes over that stuff as well, it was about how to refuse such offer and not get in trouble.
    Like I said, keep telling yourself whatever you need to. No one here buys your bullshit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rudol Von Stroheim View Post
    I do not need to play the role of "holier than thou". I'm above that..

  5. #14625
    Void Lord Felya's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    the other
    Posts
    58,334
    Quote Originally Posted by s_bushido View Post
    Presumably because if some lunatic had taken it upon themselves to attack her (or does in the future), his lawyers obviously want to distance him from it as much as possible. The moron seems to be in enough trouble without adding a blatant incitement to violence on top of everything.
    If he gets away with it, the precedent is pretty fucked. It would mean you can send an email to someone that threatens them, as long as that email contains an attachment and claims you didn’t mean it, the threat would be legal. The mob extorting a business, once done... a lawyer would walk in with a letter of apology to say all threats made were unintentional, meaning to carry no ill intent.
    Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
    Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
    The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
    No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi

  6. #14626
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripster42 View Post
    Like I said, keep telling yourself whatever you need to. No one here buys your bullshit.
    It is pretty obvious that Butina's investigation is going nowhere.

    There will be no sudden revelations. She'll most likely get "time served", and might not even get deported in the end.

  7. #14627
    That "random picture" Stone found on the internet, has anyone found the "source"?

    His lie is amazing. Why that background, Stone? Why is the only unobstructed object in the background the cross hairs, Stone?

  8. #14628
    The Undying Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    39,995
    Quote Originally Posted by Dendrek View Post
    That "random picture" Stone found on the internet, has anyone found the "source"?
    The photograph — a version of which appeared earlier on a site pushing false conspiracy theories — featured a target symbol near the judge's head. The symbol is also associated with the Zodiac killer.

    Best I could do in five minutes.

  9. #14629
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    It is pretty obvious that Butina's investigation is going nowhere.

    There will be no sudden revelations. She'll most likely get "time served", and might not even get deported in the end.
    It's pretty obvious that your fantasy land is not reality, and her case is going to lead to more arrests.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rudol Von Stroheim View Post
    I do not need to play the role of "holier than thou". I'm above that..

  10. #14630
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripster42 View Post
    It's pretty obvious that your fantasy land is not reality, and her case is going to lead to more arrests.
    Upon which information do you base that assessment?

  11. #14631
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Upon which information do you base that assessment?
    Pay attention to reality.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rudol Von Stroheim View Post
    I do not need to play the role of "holier than thou". I'm above that..

  12. #14632
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripster42 View Post
    Maddow, really?

    Paul Erickson fraud doesn't seem to be connected to Butina in any way so far; it certainly has nothing to do with Butina's indictment.

  13. #14633
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Maddow, really?

    Paul Erickson fraud doesn't seem to be connected to Butina in any way so far; it certainly has nothing to do with Butina's indictment.
    Like I said, keep telling yourself whatever you need to.

    Edit: looks like we might get more info on the "mystery subpoena" soon. My money is still on qatar.
    Last edited by Ripster42; 2019-02-19 at 03:14 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rudol Von Stroheim View Post
    I do not need to play the role of "holier than thou". I'm above that..

  14. #14634
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripster42 View Post
    Like I said, keep telling yourself whatever you need to.
    Butina isn't part of Mueller's probe, so any outcome isn't going to be worth much.

  15. #14635
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    How would you know whether she's a part of his probe or not?
    He wouldn't, it's just something he has to tell himself.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rudol Von Stroheim View Post
    I do not need to play the role of "holier than thou". I'm above that..

  16. #14636
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    How would you know whether she's a part of his probe or not?
    Because she was already interviewed by FBI before, and her indictment didn't come from Mueller?

    Why would he offload indictment elsewhere if she was relevant to him?

  17. #14637
    The Undying Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    39,995
    Stone hauled back into court to explain the cross-hairs.

    Reportedly, the judge is going to demand an answer to "why shouldn't I modify the gag order?" And I'm so eager to hear that defense.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Jettisawn View Post
    It's like he wants to go to prison.
    So is a "Minute Order" an order so obvious that it only took a minute to fill out the paperwork? Asking for a Stone.

  18. #14638
    The Undying Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    39,995
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    After reading the filing it’s clear that the question is “why shouldn’t I revoke bail?”
    ...or it could be that. Yes, Judge Jackson is clearly out of fucks to give by now.

    - - - Updated - - -

    The NYTimes reports that Trump asked acting AG Whitaker to put Geoffrey Berman in charge of the FBI's investigation into Cohen.

    "But that doesn't make sense. Berman recused himself in April. Whitaker wasn't acting AG yet."

    Indeed.

    Berman, Trump and Giulliani have personal and business ties, and Trump fired Preet Brahahahahaha last year, replacing him with Berman. As such, Berman was basically forced to recuse himself. Trump knew that, and asked Whitaker anyhow.

    Incidentally, supposedly Whitaker also knew this, and refused the order. And then Trump tweeted and went golfing.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Always back up your data.

    The Associated Press reports that McCabe, worried that other people would be fired after Comey was --

    "Wasn't McCabe himself fired?"

    Well, yes, that's kind of the point. Anyhow, McCabe had the FBI make backups of all the evidence of the Russian and related probes, for exactly this type of situation.

    ALso:

    McCabe hinted at that anxiety in an interview that aired Sunday with CBS News’s “60 Minutes,” saying he met with investigators after Comey’s firing.

    “I was very concerned that I was able to put the Russia case on absolutely solid ground, in an indelible fashion,” McCabe said. “That were I removed quickly, or reassigned or fired, that the case could not be closed or vanish in the night without a trace.”

    He added, “I wanted to make sure that our case was on solid ground and if somebody came in behind me and closed it and tried to walk away from it, they would not be able to do that without creating a record of why they made that decision.”
    McCabe more or less confirms it personally.

  19. #14639
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,550
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    ...or it could be that. Yes, Judge Jackson is clearly out of fucks to give by now.

    - - - Updated - - -

    The NYTimes reports that Trump asked acting AG Whitaker to put Geoffrey Berman in charge of the FBI's investigation into Cohen.

    "But that doesn't make sense. Berman recused himself in April. Whitaker wasn't acting AG yet."

    Indeed.

    Berman, Trump and Giulliani have personal and business ties, and Trump fired Preet Brahahahahaha last year, replacing him with Berman. As such, Berman was basically forced to recuse himself. Trump knew that, and asked Whitaker anyhow.

    Incidentally, supposedly Whitaker also knew this, and refused the order. And then Trump tweeted and went golfing.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Always back up your data.

    The Associated Press reports that McCabe, worried that other people would be fired after Comey was --

    "Wasn't McCabe himself fired?"

    Well, yes, that's kind of the point. Anyhow, McCabe had the FBI make backups of all the evidence of the Russian and related probes, for exactly this type of situation.

    ALso:

    McCabe hinted at that anxiety in an interview that aired Sunday with CBS News’s “60 Minutes,” saying he met with investigators after Comey’s firing.

    “I was very concerned that I was able to put the Russia case on absolutely solid ground, in an indelible fashion,” McCabe said. “That were I removed quickly, or reassigned or fired, that the case could not be closed or vanish in the night without a trace.”

    He added, “I wanted to make sure that our case was on solid ground and if somebody came in behind me and closed it and tried to walk away from it, they would not be able to do that without creating a record of why they made that decision.”
    McCabe more or less confirms it personally.
    I feel like if the writers of V for Vendetta wrote a prequel, scenes like the above would be in it.

  20. #14640
    The Undying Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    39,995
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    After reading the filing it’s clear that the question is “why shouldn’t I revoke bail?”
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jus...m-post-n973161

    A judge may send Roger Stone to jail after Stone posted a photo of the judge on Instagram Monday afternoon with crosshairs in the background next to her head.

    Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who is presiding over Stone's prosecution in D.C. federal court, scheduled a new hearing Thursday to discuss "why the media contact order entered in this case and/or his conditions of release should not be modified or revoked in light of the posts on his Instagram account." The judge's options include revoking his bail.
    Saying "I'm sorry" and hoping that would be good enough isn't the iron-clad strategy these days as it was when you were six.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •