Which ends the matter there and then.Mueller does have the jurisdiction. It's just against DoJ policy, and the evidence for collusion doesn't meet the standard of proof of, "beyond a reasonable doubt
Which ends the matter there and then.Mueller does have the jurisdiction. It's just against DoJ policy, and the evidence for collusion doesn't meet the standard of proof of, "beyond a reasonable doubt
One way or another that report will get out with no redactions. Everyone in D.C. seems to be pretending that there is one paper copy of the report and that there aren't copies of it sitting around on laptops and on printers. That's just dumb. It absolutely will get leaked.
If half the folks in line at Starbucks would just go to Dairy Queen and order milkshakes, they’d be twice as happy at half the price.
If it ever makes it to court this summary would be presented as evidence and he would be forced to explain himself. Don't get stuck up on a word in order to avoid my question.
What does that have to do with Barr quoting Muellers report, a few times throughout his summary? And why do you believe Barr is lying about quoting from the Mueller report?
Or not.If it ever makes it to court this summary would be presented as evidence and he would be forced to explain himself.
My point is that you cannot say he "perjured himself" and perjury refers to testimony under oath