Beta Key Giveaway Week 3: Winners have been selected!

Thread: add karazhan

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
5
LastLast
  1. #41
    Scale down Black Temple and add it too init

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Minikin View Post
    part of classic's thing was attunements. Kara had an attunement, that requires BC dungeons. This thus wouldnt work unless you remove attunements and then it will be the whole argument all over again.
    Just make the attunement to have killed KT

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiedzemir View Post
    It's also possible to add Deathwing to vanilla but it's not going to be vanilla anymore.
    Who's gonna care once it's 2 years in and everyone's raided Naxx for the bajillionth time with no perceivable content update in sight? Retooling content into the Vanilla scheme would be a great addition, assuming they never roll into TBC.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    "Real" Demon Hunters don't work as a class in modern WoW
    Quote Originally Posted by Talen View Post
    Please point out to me the player Demon Hunter who has Meta.

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Aggrophobic View Post
    Oooh and the Cata zones. They are part of the old world as well, right?
    And the Acherus flying above the EP? Come to think of it, Paladins should have their class hall too, it's just a basement of the Light's Hope chapel, after all...

  5. #45
    Well most people in that poll wanted the unreleased locations (Uldum, Grim Batol etc) released as Vanilla raids but also wanted them to only scale to Naxx difficulty/ilvl so they would be alternate ways to get to BIS rather than another difficulty. Like some said here already Naxx was possibly being planned for Vanilla, I remember them maybe thinking of having an AQ scepter-like requirement with Atiesh to be able to open the Dark Portal on each server but went against it (this might actually just be speculation from back then that I remember though).

    I think it would be cool but only if they make it different. Maybe it could be accessible after Naxx, and it would lead to an old Outland raid. Another thing I remember but might've just been speculation: DKs in Wrath were originally going to be Warrior and Paladin only (and new hero classes would be based on armor type/lore), you would become one after doing a long ass quest chain at max lvl. Would be cool if they had hero classes with that concept down the line (I'd still want there to be a period where it's pure Vanilla then eventually have alternate content), they could have more balanced hero classes so if you want to raid or tank as Shaman their hero class could be Far Seer with an earth tanking and 2h dps spec.
    Last edited by JCD000; 2017-12-04 at 11:54 PM.

  6. #46
    I would actually love the Cata zones (barring Deepholm and Vash'jr) to be added, but I think it would somehow need to all be deressed so it doesn't all stick out like a sore thumb alongside all the old trashy-looking vanilla zones. I love the idea of it, I just don't know how they would make it work.

    Karazhan still works since it still fits the Vanilla look that TBC had for most of its content. I don't even think ZA should be added since it wasn't (and still isn't) a part of the main world.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    "Real" Demon Hunters don't work as a class in modern WoW
    Quote Originally Posted by Talen View Post
    Please point out to me the player Demon Hunter who has Meta.

  7. #47
    There is plenty of content in classic. Most people will not be able to clear Naxx.

  8. #48
    No. Karazhan is BC content. You wanted Vanilla, you're getting vanilla.

  9. #49
    Add Pandaria!

  10. #50
    No Kara is a stupid idea but they should definitely add HFC since no one played that crappy xpac.

  11. #51
    Look, so long as they add flying and some form of AP stat grind, as well as RNG item stats so i can keep farming Naxx so im not bored 6 months into classic, ill be happy.

  12. #52
    Also they need to add the cash shop in and definitely level 60 boosts.

  13. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by Aggrophobic View Post
    Oooh and the Cata zones. They are part of the old world as well, right?
    old world = cataclysm, lul. Nice reaching.

  14. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by Eskwyre View Post
    old world = cataclysm, lul. Nice reaching.
    Kara raid in vanilla? Yeah, it's about as stupid.

    I was not serious though but whatever.

  15. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by rewhaha View Post
    Why not add karazhan? It's in the old world, and they would just have to scale it to 60. It could be post nax content


    WHY NOT JUST ADD ICECROWN and TOL BARAD, Screw it just add everything and scale it to 60, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  16. #56
    Jesus, I mean, I am all for adding QOL stuff, like collections, achievments and guild banks (to a degree, depends on how well it all *fits8 and economy changes etc)

    But adding Karazhan? That is totally defeating the point of Classic content.

  17. #57
    Quote Originally Posted by arkanon View Post
    Classic should be out early in the new year, maybe feb/march. most people will be done wtih Naxx by the end of the year, i mean the machanics are a joke, it will be a complete walkover. i expect them to release TBC:Classic late next year, or very early 2019, january. So just wait for it then.
    Are you nuts? Did you follow Blizzcon? They just started putting a team together to begin working on it. We don't know if that means physically or conceptually. They have no clue what will be a part of it in terms of features, what patch, any QoL features, and so on. This will not launch 2019 or 2020 at the earliest.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by drori8 View Post
    actually, karazhan was supposed to be part of vanilla as you can see staff of atiesh could portal you there. why would they make a staff port you to an unopen dung? coz originally it was supposed to be part of vanilla but delayed to TBC. go watch some youtube videos. HFP in outland is part of vanilla, emerald dream is part of vanilla, grim batol, mount hyjal. even one of the questions of them on one of blizzard polls was "how would you like to see scrapped content that was supposed to be part of the game added in classic". so no dont give me BS about its not part of vanilla, if you want to get with me in the little things, then yes, it wasnt OPEN in vanilla but i can argue that zone files were there and people could visit there (through exploits ofc) so yea its part of vanilla.
    So was Outlands, Northrend, and dozens of other things that were scrapped for future expansions. Come to speak of it, where is the outrage over all the vanilla cuts.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Loxotron View Post
    Yes, Karazhan should have been right after the naxx originally in vanilla, dunno why they were in hurry to launch TBC actually while Karazhan as the last raid would make sense. Also there was a good story line with corrupted ashbringer that would transform to legendary ashbringer, but scraped it as well because of TBC.
    There was no rush, in fact they were not sure if they were going OL, NR, or something else next. It had been over two years since vanilla launched when TBC came out.

  18. #58
    While you're at it, we should have Firelands as well, it is after all on the same continent. Oh and pretty much any Cataclysm instance.
    Hook 'till you're hooked!

  19. #59
    I think we can all agree that Classic is not going to be complete without Vashj'ir.

  20. #60
    Quote Originally Posted by UnifiedDivide View Post
    Jesus wept. This is either a poor troll or... well, it's gotta be a troll.


    So, you likely never actually wanted Classic servers then? Shame.
    No one really does.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •