I'm not lying, you misunderstood what I was saying. In the first link there, you quoted from the 'Advisary Commissions' section, first paragraph. The second paragraph says "The legislature is not bound by what these advisory commissions recommend, but because the legislative leadership usually has a role in appointing the commission's membership, the commission's advice tends to influence the legislature's final decision substantially.". This is what I was referring to when I said you ignored the bits that didn't agree with you.
If you're interested, the list of states down the left side has the details for each state. That's where my second link came from, I clicked on Maine. Admittedly I didn't do that for all states, so I agree with you that Iowa's set up sounds pretty reasonable. Theoretically it's still susceptible to tampering in that if the legislature rejects the commission's advice 3 times then they're allowed to just do whatever they want, but that hasn't happened yet and I'd consider it a fairly unlikely scenario.
Even then, you're still only talking about a total of 5-8 states (I didn't check on the details of all advisory commissions) with independent districting which is hardly the "many more" you initially claimed.
best solution is just popular vote the fuck out if everything. Much more simple and fair. No delegates, no electorial college. Just votes.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler