Poll: Is it time to merge?

Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
12
... LastLast
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by RuneDK View Post
    I guess this is what I would like more than merging....Just get a bunch of the smaller servers connected to make up a connected realm with 8-10k players at a minimum imho. I refuse to go anywhere BUT a high populated realm now because I've been on US-Malfurion/Trollbane and US-Area-52...and A52 is by far a better server through and through....but if Malf/Troll were connected to other realms to bring the population up I would consider it.
    It's really the only true option, connect small realms into one med-high pop "realm" with all current connection rules. Right now its like 3 low pop connected into something ends up being just another low pop.

  2. #22
    Please wait Temp name's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Under construction
    Posts
    14,631
    Just connect all realms together, and use CRZ and sharding to make sure areas aren't too overly full

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Gimlix View Post
    Most realms in WoW are more dead then dead. CRZ is a nice solution but we are on a point where merging realms would be doing WoW a much more benefit then CRZ does.

    So what is your opinion? Is it time to merge realms togheter and build a community again?
    They would really need to work over the old zones to use the more recent respawn system. Multi-tagging does wonders, but not if you're 30 seconds behind someone who just cleared the entire quest area before you.

    But if they did that, I think condensing the servers again might work alright.

  4. #24
    If you guys are so concerned about names just allow people to have the same name. On connected realms a ton of people is using the same name and its no problem at all. Just keep the names unique on RP realms.

  5. #25
    Over 9000! Gimlix's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The Netherlands!
    Posts
    9,603
    Quote Originally Posted by Bennett View Post
    I wouldn't mind, lots of people would be upset about losing names though - if they did that they should expand the name system to allow second names, punctuation etc
    If people rather play on a dead server, with 0 community. Then having a different name that they used to have, or have a dot over 1 letter instead and have a more community in the realm, then i think we got some whiny playerbase.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shekora View Post
    Goddamn it, Gimlix, why do you keep making these threads?
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam the Wiser View Post
    Goddamn it, Gimlix, why do you keep making these threads?

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Atherions View Post
    If you guys are so concerned about names just allow people to have the same name. On connected realms a ton of people is using the same name and its no problem at all. Just keep the names unique on RP realms.
    Honestly I've never understood the problem with two people sharing names. There are plenty of other aesthetic differences bound to be present to distinguish them.

  7. #27
    Over 9000! Gimlix's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The Netherlands!
    Posts
    9,603
    Quote Originally Posted by Mehman View Post
    Just connect all realms together, and use CRZ and sharding to make sure areas aren't too overly full
    Hell no, CRZ should be used to make areas, more populated, not less populated.
    Wanna know why the biggest realm of EU died? Because we had places with 100 pop and then CRZ/Sharding came and now we got places where only 1-5 people remain.

    So i rather have them Merge realms togheter and use CRZ at places where the zone is not as active as it should be, then making CRZ phase people away.

    Overcrowded areas and the feeling of a populated game is part of MMORPG. Not the idea of less = good.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shekora View Post
    Goddamn it, Gimlix, why do you keep making these threads?
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam the Wiser View Post
    Goddamn it, Gimlix, why do you keep making these threads?

  8. #28
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by LaserChild9 View Post
    You volunteering to give up all your character names because other people already have them?
    This is such a petty reason. Is finding a new name or adding an extra character that dramatic to you?

    No! I want to keep my name and the game can die for it! I don't care! -> lovely destructive mindset.

    How about you keep the name with the old server name? You know... like what you have now?

  9. #29
    Should have been done years ago but for whatever reason (server transefer money most likely) they just don't want to.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Gimlix View Post
    Hell no, CRZ should be used to make areas, more populated, not less populated.
    Wanna know why the biggest realm of EU died? Because we had places with 100 pop and then CRZ/Sharding came and now we got places where only 1-5 people remain.

    So i rather have them Merge realms togheter and use CRZ at places where the zone is not as active as it should be, then making CRZ phase people away.

    Overcrowded areas and the feeling of a populated game is part of MMORPG. Not the idea of less = good.
    Not that it matters now, but sharding keeps launches smooth at least. More people in one area = more lag = more "world server down"

  11. #31
    Over 9000! Gimlix's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The Netherlands!
    Posts
    9,603
    Quote Originally Posted by Onikaroshi View Post
    Not that it matters now, but sharding keeps launches smooth at least. More people in one area = more lag = more "world server down"
    In my opinion it's part of the MMORPG experience. I rather have all those lag moments, overcrowded moments and world server down. Then feeling like i am in a dead world. Because that is how sharding feels like most of the time. You gonna think back of the past and look around now (At launch) and all you see is less activity.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shekora View Post
    Goddamn it, Gimlix, why do you keep making these threads?
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam the Wiser View Post
    Goddamn it, Gimlix, why do you keep making these threads?

  12. #32
    Allow Cross Realm Guilds and trading and the issues go away.

    I don't care if that would effect Auction House barons since the other benefits far outweigh the impact such a change would have on a small portion of the player base.

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Gimlix View Post
    In my opinion it's part of the MMORPG experience. I rather have all those lag moments, overcrowded moments and world server down. Then feeling like i am in a dead world. Because that is how sharding feels like most of the time. You gonna think back of the past and look around now (At launch) and all you see is less activity.
    I'd rather have smooth launches... so i'm with blizzard on this one.

  14. #34
    How many times have yall seen a thread necrod from the blue tracker and then see the same topic created on here...lol
    "I'm Tru @ w/e I do" ~ TM

  15. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by mkultra55 View Post
    Allow Cross Realm Guilds and trading and the issues go away.

    I don't care if that would effect Auction House barons since the other benefits far outweigh the impact such a change would have on a small portion of the player base.
    I am 100 % with this ... Cross realm guilds and AH would help a lot.

  16. #36
    The Unstoppable Force Super Kami Dende's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    The Lookout
    Posts
    20,979
    Isn't this basically what they are doing in BFA? PvP shard and PvE Shard? I mean everythings connected in every sense but the ability to join a Guild on any server or mythic Raid cross server, and the Realms with low pops are already connected..

  17. #37
    Legendary!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    If you knew you would run the other way.
    Posts
    6,763
    Quote Originally Posted by Gimlix View Post
    In my opinion it's part of the MMORPG experience. I rather have all those lag moments, overcrowded moments and world server down. Then feeling like i am in a dead world. Because that is how sharding feels like most of the time. You gonna think back of the past and look around now (At launch) and all you see is less activity.
    I prefer a super smooth new xpac launch over, getting world server down, being at 5000 in queue or lag up the wahzoo..

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Meat Rubbing Specialist View Post
    Isn't this basically what they are doing in BFA? PvP shard and PvE Shard? I mean everythings connected in every sense but the ability to join a Guild on any server or mythic Raid cross server, and the Realms with low pops are already connected..
    Yeah that is my understanding as well of the new PVE/PVP toggle system in BfA, just have to wait and see how it actually works..

  18. #38
    Nope. Idk how you could play the game and say this. Everything in the game other than mythic raiding can be done cross realm. There is 0 reason to merge the realms.
    Owner of ONEAzerothTV
    Tanking, Blood DK Mythic+ Pugging, Soloing and WoW Challenges alongside other discussions about all things in World of Warcraft
    ONEAzerothTV

  19. #39
    Legendary!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    If you knew you would run the other way.
    Posts
    6,763
    Quote Originally Posted by Nymrohd View Post
    Connected realms work just fine. Connect more.

    And please connect AD to the other RP realms. Yes I know we are full but I want more alts! Plus, sharding.
    Exactly the way they are doing it now with connected realms is good enough, and works very well be interesting to see how this new PVE/PVP toggle system system in BfA pans out..

  20. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Benomatic View Post
    Instead of having 200 low pop realms, I would rather have 40 mid to high pop realms. Having a low pop server with minimal players negates the point of MMO.
    Agreed.

    When servers were first connected my main realm and the one we connected with were both medium population that were combined. Now both are low pop and it feels worse than it did before.

    I feel like Blizzard should be in a constant realm-connection state. Once a realm hits low population it is connected with a medium population realm. That way these realms do not immediately become too big with queues, but have more activity.

    They would definitely need some outlined connection standards though:
    Maybe 2-3 low population realms get connected with a medium population realm and then you have good numbers. Do not add any more.
    Or if no medium pops are available to connect maybe six low population realms together. Do not add any more.


    From my experience on a low population realm that has been connected and the other realm is low pop as well; I think we could handle 3x more easily.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •