Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ...
6
7
8
9
LastLast
  1. #141
    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    Pfft. Consequences are for the plebians not part of the Grand American Empire. People beg us to ruin their countries and then leave useless figureheads that fold to pressure and lead to a power vaccumm.

    Just look at how bright and shiny Libya is!
    Libya was a UK/French thing Trumpkin. The US was just the muscle.

    And really, Libya is irrelevant to anything. A desert, resource poor country of 9 million that is largely geographically barren? Big deal.

  2. #142
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    And where do you think those bombers and drones are flown out of? Syria.

    No. Turkey.

    Thus proving my point, junior.

    - - - Updated - - -



    SO basically what you're saying is words and definitions don't actually mean anything, and you just want to call two things the same that are entirely different because it's easy for you.

    Gotcha.
    Yawn. You mean the people who are buttfucking Europe by not catching refugees and has to be bribed regularly to comply?

    Mmhmm. Totally holding the leash.

  3. #143
    Quote Originally Posted by Sturmbringe View Post
    I generally agree with what you say BUT, Assad didn't betray you, it was YOU who betrayed him:
    .
    That's just what I said. Erdogan betrayed him, poured oil to the civil war in Syria.

    edit

    I just saw I used "can" instead of "can't". Yeah, Turkey is 100% wrong on Syria. That's what I've been saying since day one.
    Last edited by Kuntantee; 2018-02-16 at 01:31 PM.

  4. #144
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    And where do you think those bombers and drones are flown out of? Syria.

    No. Turkey.

    Thus proving my point, junior.

    - - - Updated - - -



    SO basically what you're saying is words and definitions don't actually mean anything, and you just want to call two things the same that are entirely different because it's easy for you.

    Gotcha.
    Words and definitions can be twisted however you like. Just look at Al-Qaeda, they were a "proxy" or even an allied to the US before they turned against them, look how quickly that turned to the worse when they decided to not like the US anymore, suddenly they are a terrorist group!

  5. #145
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    Libya was a UK/French thing Trumpkin. The US was just the muscle.

    And really, Libya is irrelevant to anything. A desert, resource poor country of 9 million that is largely geographically barren? Big deal.
    This is the best.

    Let me guess. Trump is stupid for calling countries shitholes but not you, right?

  6. #146
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Yes Russia, please sell more of your equipment to NATO countries. Surely nobody will reverse engineer it and pour over every square inch of it looking for what makes it tick.
    American soldiers in Turkey are not authorized to wander around in Turkish bases as they please, investigate any equipment they like...Same thing applies to Turkish soldiers as well. Turkish soldiers do not have access to American inventory in Incirlik.

  7. #147
    Quote Originally Posted by Kuntantee View Post
    When it comes to that point, your planes will not be allowed to take off. Currently, you bombing some Russians and Syrians with planes took off from Incirlik doesn't matter to Turkey. It matters, but not that much. Do you really think Turkey will let you fly off and bomb Turkish soldiers on the ground while fighting with Kurds?
    The US won't bomb Turkish troops because it'll never get to that point.

    But that being said, you've given a whole song and dance, litterally for years, about what Turkey will or will not allow the US to do. And none of it has happened.

    Know why? Because Erdogan doesn't have a strong hand.

    Suppose he freezes US operations out of Turkey. What does the US do? It flies its B-1 bombers out of Turkey and lands them in Kuwait or Qatar, which is very happy to host use forces. The US then does the exact same thing it is doing in Turkey. Is the cost greater? Oh you bet. Our gas bill goes way up. But that's it. The US will will still do exactly the same thing.

    And that is why this idle threat of yours continues to be idle. Because Erdogan recognzies he can host the US, and maintain some say, or alienate the US and find himself with no say. And since he won't attack the US military of course, because he's not that insane, that leaves him with just one option: to let the US fly.


    Quote Originally Posted by Kuntantee View Post
    No, Russia and Syria will close their airspace to you.
    it's been closed for years. When do you think they will get around to actually enforcing that?


    Quote Originally Posted by Kuntantee View Post
    Russia will be able to down your jets while having the international law on their side.
    The second a Russian battery launches an anti-aircraft missile at a US jet, the US will destroy all Russian batteries. The Russians and Syrians together mathematically do not have enough missiles in Syria to defend against a US Surpression of Enemy Air Defenses campaign. The Russians know this, which is why they won't try to do it. And neither will they send air power into Syria to actually fight US combat aircraft, because the sequel to that is the US launching a major military campaign to evict the Russians from Syria... a campaign the Russians would be hard pressed with their extremely limited strategic lift and bad geography, to wage.

    So again, they won't do it. You're living a fantasy.


    Quote Originally Posted by Kuntantee View Post
    You won't enter into Syrian airspace. That's what "kicking" means.
    Yeah sure. Because the US would just roll over like that. You mean, just like the US doesn't enter territory the Chinese claims on a regular basis?

    The US position is pretty fucking clear, no matter how much you don't like it: it double dares you to fire something at it , when they go to a place you don't want them to be. And if you're stupid enough to do that, do you think the united states will just let you get away with it? No. It won;t. And everybody knows it.

    You may not. But your President does, as does Vladmir Putin, and Assad.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuntantee View Post
    You are an ignorant. The army was infiltrated by Gulenists, but not completely. That's why the first army was not mobilized in the coup attempt, because the commander was not Gulenist. The next time you open your ignorant mouth, make sure you know the details of the coup attempt.
    Well I'm just looking forward to the sequel. When can we see that.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuntantee View Post
    Turkey has one of the most effective armies in the world, definitely in top 5.
    It's vastly inferior to:
    The United States
    China
    Russia
    South Korea
    Japan
    France
    the United Kingdom
    India
    Israel

    Maybe top 10. definetly not top 5. More likely top 15. It's a big but antiquated and poorly trained force.

    Don't worry, I'm sure the TAI TFX will happen before there is World of Warcraft II.

  8. #148
    @Skroe,

    Aren't you a fast quoter. I removed the insult from my post before you posted, fyi. Anyway, I completely disagree but won't bother responding point by point.

  9. #149
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobbywan View Post
    Words and definitions can be twisted however you like. Just look at Al-Qaeda, they were a "proxy" or even an allied to the US before they turned against them, look how quickly that turned to the worse when they decided to not like the US anymore, suddenly they are a terrorist group!
    You're wrong on this too.

    Al Qaeda was never a proxy of the US.

    The entirely differently Afghan Mujaheddin was a proxy of the United States during the 1980s Afghan War. When the Soviet Union withdrew and the US dropped support, some of those Mujuahideen became the Taliban, some became the the Northern Alliance, some became other ethnic milita groups, and a handful of people who met each other formed what would become Al Qaeda, which was largely staffed with people from Al-Zawahiri's Egyptian Islamic Jihad. They merged with Al Qaeda in the 1990s and had nothing to do with the Afghan War.

    But you know what happened to most of the Mujaheddin? They retired and became civilians. 20-somethings in the early 1980s were in their mid-to-late 40s by the early 2000s. Not exactly the rank and file of AL Qaeda or the Taliban encountered in 2001 in Afghanistan, which were largely people born in the 1970s and 1980s. They would have been kids during the war in Afghanistan, just as the people the US are fighting in Afghanistan today were largely kids when then US invaded in 2001.

    Time marches on.

    Al Qaeda did not exist during the Soviet's Afghan War and were never a US proxy.

    "The US funded the Taliban" and "the US funded Al Qaeda" is stupid person's sloppy history.

    So yes, words and definitions do matter, and through your ignorance of pretty basic history you made my point yet again.

  10. #150
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimjinx View Post
    Apparently a host composed of Syrian soldiers and Russian mercenaries was taken out by the US army earlier this week when trying to take over an oil field controlled by Kurdish militants supported by the US.

    According to Russian media the Russians involved worked for a company called Wagner Group a private security firm also active in Ukraine, some believe this to be a unofficial part of Russian military fighting fights Russia officially does not want to engage but this is speculation at this point

    What do you guys think? Where these guys just your run of the mill mercenaries stuck between a rock and a hard place? Or are they a part of modern Russian military tactics, one based on proxy warfare and plausible deniability?


    So you start with: "They might be fighting for russia" and then imply with the whole "proxy warfare and plausible deniability".

    No I do not believe in the US propaganda that russia is the world's most evil country and that they are so evil because they hack and spy. I believe in objective data that most countries do this shit.

    If you want to believe it? Go you! But for me? I'd rather await facts and data instead of fearmongering.

  11. #151
    Quote Originally Posted by Kuntantee View Post
    @Skroe,

    Aren't you a fast quoter. I removed the insult from my post before you posted, fyi. Anyway, I completely disagree but won't bother responding point by point.
    That's fine. I'll just close by saying, it's 2018, and Turkey hasn't done shit against the US in... wow years.

    And you won't. Because as I said, you really can't stop us. Close your airspace, then you lose a seat at the table, when we continue to do what we do from Qatar, or Italy or Romania. Or from a carrier off the coast. Just like that one time, during the coup, where you did cut off our use of your air base.

    Erdogan, not a stupid man, plays ball because he knows some leverage is better than no leverage, and those are precisely the two options.

    This, Kuntantee, is what it means to be the junior partner in the relationship that Turkey has not been particularly awesome in as of late. Respect your limits. Turkey is a important regional player and stakeholder that certainly should have a voice. But a significant power? One that can dictate the order of things? It is not within a light year of being. The US is first among equals in NATO. Most often the "equals" part of that takes precedence. Here, as you're seeing right now, is when "first" comes into play.

  12. #152
    Quote Originally Posted by 8bithamster View Post
    So you start with: "They might be fighting for russia" and then imply with the whole "proxy warfare and plausible deniability".

    No I do not believe in the US propaganda that russia is the world's most evil country and that they are so evil because they hack and spy. I believe in objective data that most countries do this shit.

    If you want to believe it? Go you! But for me? I'd rather await facts and data instead of fearmongering.
    Before you start believing anything I'd suggest you work on your reading comprehension. It's clear they are Russians, the question I asked is if people believe they are simple mercenaries or if they're part of a larger game (which makes sense since those are the two stories that are being painted by western and Russian media)

    There is nothing in the OP about Russia being evil, and if there where any implications of morals they'd be directed at the Russian leadership and not a the country as a whole.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sturmbringe View Post
    They were security contractors, poor people with no means of income who went to Syria to find employment.

    If these privati soldiers were really employed by the RF, they wouldn't be there when the US struck.
    I doubt they are very poor since generally private contractors get paid a lot more then your run of the mill soldier. However most if not all of them would need a military background in order to be eligible to get the job. The weird thing about these mercenaries is that the ones that didn't die are now being treated in Russian military hospitals which is something that doesn't generally happen with private contractors.

  13. #153
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    Of course we care about our allies. The US spends billions of dollars defending them. The US is deeply integrated with them.

    But alliances are driven by mutual interests. Interests drive relations far more than values.

    And with regards to North Korea, you're half wrong. South Korea wants to take the tone of the conversation down, but our position is lock step with Japan and Australia. Who is right? The allies will find a consensus.

    And with regards to Russia, considering that European countries are upping defense spending, because of Russia, and requesting more US aid to Europe, because of Russia, you're flat out wrong.

    The US is spending billions more next year to defend Eastern Europe. We weren't doing that a few years ago. We did it to defend Europe.
    "Defending" and "using" are different concepts. You're USING Japan and Australia and eastern Europe to your benefits. You're not defending them. Defending them would require you to not do whatever is in your power to increase tensions.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    That's fine. I'll just close by saying, it's 2018, and Turkey hasn't done shit against the US in... wow years.

    And you won't. Because as I said, you really can't stop us. Close your airspace, then you lose a seat at the table, when we continue to do what we do from Qatar, or Italy or Romania. Or from a carrier off the coast. Just like that one time, during the coup, where you did cut off our use of your air base.

    Erdogan, not a stupid man, plays ball because he knows some leverage is better than no leverage, and those are precisely the two options.

    This, Kuntantee, is what it means to be the junior partner in the relationship that Turkey has not been particularly awesome in as of late. Respect your limits. Turkey is a important regional player and stakeholder that certainly should have a voice. But a significant power? One that can dictate the order of things? It is not within a light year of being. The US is first among equals in NATO. Most often the "equals" part of that takes precedence. Here, as you're seeing right now, is when "first" comes into play.
    See Skroe, no offence, but youre too focused on today.
    Yes turkey hasn't done anything... yet. Who knows what happens in 30 years, considering the series of failures your own foreign policies have led to.

  14. #154
    Quote Originally Posted by Corvus View Post
    It isn't for the oil.

    The US is on the brink of being sufficient in the production of oil. They don't need to invade places to get oil.

    Even if they did, there is a certain south american basketcase of a nation on their doorstep with plenty of oil that would be far easier to invade than going half way around the world to the middle east. And they could even justify it on the grounds of a humanitarian crisis.
    THey did take control of oil fields in northern Syria. Main purpose is geographical obviously... The enemy the West is trying to sell to us is Russia afterall...

  15. #155
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    Libya was a UK/French thing Trumpkin. The US was just the muscle.

    And really, Libya is irrelevant to anything. A desert, resource poor country of 9 million that is largely geographically barren? Big deal.
    Yes big deal. Huge deal actually. Have you heard of that "immigration crisis" Europe is going through? Does it ring a bell?
    See you dont even care yourself, I can only imagine your employers.

  16. #156
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-m...source=twitter

    The number has been revised up to 300 Russian mercenaries.

    That will be hard for Russia to replace any time soon.
    So, no evidence.

    Again.

    MSM keep digging their hole down to tabloid status

  17. #157
    Quote Originally Posted by Ser Arthur Dayne View Post
    So, no evidence.

    Again.

    MSM keep digging their hole down to tabloid status
    That's an odd opinion to have for someone who thinks Russia Today is a credible news outlet.

  18. #158
    Deleted
    You present a blank u can fill with anything u want to write there. You expect credibility when you write anonymous source?

    QQ moar, fake news.

  19. #159
    Deleted
    The real story here is that hammering a bunch of quasi russian mercs is niether a victory for the US or a defeat for the Russians.

    The US are stuck in an unwinnable war that it can't transform and it can't leave.

  20. #160
    I am Murloc! Mister K's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Under your desk
    Posts
    5,629
    *tinfoil on* So let me get this straight, Russians, the US and who knows who else staged the whole migrant crisis by creating false terror (again) so that they could go in and steal their oil? *tinfoil off*
    -K

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •