https://www.economist.com/news/world...ould-be-bribed
[*]- Workers become more productive when they move from a poor country to a richer one with more efficient firms and better capital.
[*]- It is more difficult to transfer better institutions into countries than it is to transfer people from those countries into ones with better institutions.
[*]- Not all people from poor countries necessarily want to immigrate. Only about 13% of workers from a given country want to emigrate to the US/UK/EU given the chance.
[*]- Open borders can actually lead to less overcrowding overall since immigrants from countries where large families are common tend to have smaller families when they immigrate, even if those families are still bigger than those of the native population
[*]- Uses example of the US to show benefits of cultural enrichment brought by waves of immigration from around the world.
[*]- There are solutions to prevent migrants from being a strain on resources or to prevent them from enacting huge political and cultural changes, such as preventing them from voting until x years in the country (after which they will be likely to have assimilated) and preventing them from receiving welfare benefits.
What do you think? The world would be a better place if anyone from any country was free to work in any country of their choice. Even low-skilled immigration can bring a multitude of benefits to an economy. Globalism is the future, nationalism is hindering progress.