Originally Posted by
Krigaren
Well, I guess that the only thing we can do is judge the court's credibility based on who makes it up, their history, their motivations, etc. Or, basically, do the same thing they claimed to have done.
It looks fishy, I'm not denying that. And if other professionals are also calling out the decision as strange, then the woman has an avenue for an appeal. But nothing in the article leads to the conclusion that "a man from a good family is incapable of assault" since no one said that, no one is claiming that, and by all accounts, Swedish law seems to normally favor the opposite conclusion.