thts just you assuming you don't have more arguments? talking about people writing wrong? like you himself also write shit wrong all the time? i am dyslexic boy, sometimes i do that yes, i fail to see how this make your arguments less nonsensical
what a lot of horseshit you are nittpicking, you don't have much to stand on and you are going for this, this is like the low bar of discussions, guess we are luck that you didn't use the Godwin's lawJust in this post of yours we have pearls like "differfent" instead of "different", "its" instead of "it's", "aces" instead of "races", "udnergo", "proof" instead of "prove", "standart" instead of "standard", "hypocyrsi" instead of "hypocrisy", "onjecting" instead of... I don't know, "projecting"?
i call out you about the red hearing fallacy, that you constantly use in your arguments, and your are pedantic saying im the one using, showing you are just a hypocriteLook at your own weak grasp of English before you arrogantly go around spewing lies about teaching others.
"alternate possibilities" no, you are bringing up irrelevant shit trying to disprove something, is the appeal to ignorance, you keep making unbelieble and nonsensical claims that are simple bullshit and waiting people to refut your nonsense, again, tis a low bar on the internet discussion.So once again you're stating headcanon as fact. And funny how you love to go "it's up to you to prove it"-- sorry, "its up to you to prove it"-- when what I'm doing is offering alternate possibilities while you keep insisting that your headcanon is fact.
because you ar doing thatSo if you accept that as fact, why did you accuse me of "making shit up" when I wrote exactly that!? Because that's basically all that you've quoted from me before saying "you're making shit up".
Agin, bullshit, because they alrea\dy messed up with the visual identiy of a playable race( blood elves) giving to void elvesNo, they shouldn't. Because, again, it messes with the visual identity of the playable race. Playable races have fixed silhouettes.
your double tandarts of this being off-limits because "playable races have silhoutes" is fucking laughable.
you re so above your own head you cannot see how "more than one silhouette make.no,fucking.differenceIt's not double-standards. You failing to understand my argument does not make my argument fallacious. This has nothing to do with using another race's skin color, and everything to do with having more than one silhouette for the race.
and what you do with diffeent races having the same silhoute in different factions? yes you put your rgumment in the trash.It doesn't matter that the nightborne look like night elves. It doesn't matter that void elves look like blood elves. Because I'm not talking about two separate races sharing a silhouette. I'm talking about a race's OWN INDIVIDUAL VISUAL IDENTITY in the form of their own silhoettes. Each race has their own silhouette.
it so funny that you are trying too har to say how there is a problem, and there is none, you are just babbling about silhoettes, is comical.
you can't undergo the same process if you don't do the same shit, is not hard to graspAlleria eating a dark naaru or not is immaterial to the idea that newly void elves could be undergoing the same process.
You said they are the same race, you make the claim, and didn't prove shit, while we have the game saying they are a different race of elves, its you with your own illusion.Again... you state headcanon as fact, and now you go "disprove my headcanon". If you cannot, then it is fact. That's not how facts work, dude.
Again, brining up irrelevant shit, "we do not know that alleria coul notsprout an void tentcle of her ass, so you can't say she can't"I'm not making claims of fact. You are. We do not know if Alleria could or could not transform before the end of the questline that ends with her eating the Naaru. Saying either way as fact is dishonest. And you are the only one stating opinions as fact.
using void powers is completely out of the point here, she could use void powers fine and not be a void elf, only when she absord the naaru she got her racial to change, not before, that is a fact.Two things you didn't think of when writing this weak attempt at 'gotcha': one, are you saying Alleria is a shadow priest, not a hunter? And two, shadow priests get void form earlier in their training instead of later.
th fact that you are using ouble standarts is why im repeting.The fact you repeat this shows that you're not understanding what I'm writing, here. Either because you don't care to, or because you simply can't. Either way: I am not talking about two races sharing silhouettes.
They are a new raceIt's not false equivalence. Because if the state of being a void elf is not hereditary, then void elves are not a new race, because that means their children would be normal blood elves. And if the state of being a void elf is not hereditary, then it means it makes the elf a "new race" just as much as losing an arm or a leg makes one into a different race as their kin.
unti something says otherwise they are a new raceVoid elves (or ren'dorei, "children of the Void" in Thalassian) are a race of Void-infused elves affiliated with the Alliance.
you said they are the same race, you have to prove it, your bs argument of "they do not have childrn yet so they are nto a different race" is an appeal to ignoracne trying to pss up as vallid, there is a eason why is innocent until proven guilty and not the other way around.If you want to claim as a fact that void elves are a new race (not "playable race", but actual race), then you have to prove your claim. And "they look different" is not sufficient evidence, considering the worgen look a whole lot more different than humans than VEs to BEs, yet are not a separate race.
why they would even need a settlement? they live with other orcs, in their settlements, but Nagrand alone is more than any high elf hut that you call "settlment"Seriously? Can you name one brown orc settlement on Azeroth before the Mag'har allied race? High elves have settlements of their own. Brown orcs? I can't think of anything.