Indeed, and it's not like the fel aspects of the Blood Elves don't fit the Horde, who at large understand the necessity of them, and while Orgrimmar seems to segregate them, Undead had no isses with them. So yeah, with the Illidari being a thing, I would really like if Silvermoon because the centre of fel studies on the Horde, approached on a safe way with lots of counter measures -one would think the Sunwell itself would work as an excellent countermeasure-
- - - Updated - - -
Indeed, it really doesn't feel like BE visually represent some of their core cultural aspects beyond eye color, which is true for both their Fel and Light themes. If it was like humans and they simply had a lot of options it wouldn't be much of a deal, but with both Fel and Light being such marked aspects of BE culture -with them being one of the few races that embraced Fel usage, and even when that has been downplayed, it still remains as an important aspect through Demon Hunters- have so little visual representation.
- - - Updated - - -
The point I am making is against the reductive moralization that Fel is a bad thing and that BE's should have felt ashamed of using it, that they "need" to move past it, when Legion started with the recontextualization of cosmic powers, specifically with Fel used as a tool by two classes now for the common good.
Besides, to say BE's ditched their reliance on Fel when they still have warlocks, doesn't look accurate at all. To pretend Blood Elves just moved on from using fel because the Sunwell was reignited feels like a real whitewash of their story, not because it lost prominence it means it disappeared, specially when we keep seeing BE warlocks showing up, and Blood Mages are far more closer to Warlocks than Mages (reminded these Blood Mages are not "Blood Magic" users like Blood Trolls)
Last edited by MyWholeLifeIsThunder; 2020-10-31 at 08:11 PM.
Wouldn't it be cool if Kayn Sunfury came back to challenge Lorthemar as leader of the Blood Elves, and bring some casual Fel use back into Blood Elf society? They have the Sunwell now so they won't become utterly addicted to it again, but it should be safe for recreational use. There's no reason not to see them back unless they are too antisocial for it, the villain Blood Elves in TBC (the Sunfury no relation to Kayn Sunfury) rejoined the main Horde Blood Elf faction a long time ago.
Kayn could use the Fel Hammer to shoot the Vindicaar down for good to affirm his allegiance to the Horde so we can argue about why the Blood Elves don't just use the Fel Hammer to wipe out the Alliance instead. Plus the man has this coin which we could totally retroactively say was foreshadowing all along.
All just so that Demon Hunter features aren't class locked which would be worth it IMO, give "Horde High Elves" a way to distinguish themselves. I think people are pissy because now the Void Elves can be classic High Elves AND Void Elves while Blood Elves 'only' have generic High Elves. Basically opening up 'Felblood Elf' in this way would be choice.
No new player is going to look at the below and say 'poppa what makes the Blood Elves a Horde race' and need a lecture on politics and cultural identity for it to make sense. The fact that Blood Elf Warlocks don't already get Demon Hunter options is criminal.
Last edited by shoc; 2020-10-31 at 08:40 PM.
Basically; Blood Elves have basically already a strong story with the Fel and now with the Illidari, it's just a shame nothing is being used; folding Illidari back into the BE opens so many possibilities -even NB DH-
Right now the BE "council" Is Lor'themar, Halduron and Rommath; Now think of adding Liadrin and Kayn -they can make canonical that Aldrius became the leader of the Illidari, so Kayn brings his loyalists to Silvermoon- Now that would be a cool ass Blood Elven council that reflected all aspects of their culture.
It's not that good that VE can represent more fantasies even when they are still framed as only Void Scholars, but it's neither that good that Blood Elves, having deep light and fel themes, only get representation of them on their eye color.
Yes Demon Hunter options should be unlocked to all claseess, and yes Blood Elves shoould get golden light tattoos. All that's in the way is the Paladin class and its restrictive thematics, but that doesnpt stop BE warlocks from having blue, or even more egregious, golden eyes, so a gameplay/lore segregation is already understood. And if the restrictions to Paladin class is all there is, well then just lock DH skins from Paladins; would rather one class being locked from the options, than all classes BUT one.
-And the same could be done with Undead Elves now that we are here, and in that way, all these derivatives are sufficiently represented through BE's and we can move forward with other AR ideas-
The problem is not that VE's get to share BE assets, the problem is that BE's should not be so restricted when their lore is so much more nuanced, and it really comes down to customization options not reflecting all the possibilities a BE has within the lore.
Even a Fel Blood Elf Paladin would be really cool. If you recall the Blood Elves during TBC were still using power siphoned from a defeated Naaru and Blood Elf Paladins had a unique ability called Seal of Blood. Since then the game has normalized everything between factions but there was once a time when the Blood Elves were playable as evil Paladins. Its unconventional but I don't think the lore would prohibit the existence of Fel Blood Elf Paladins and Priests. Regardless, rule of cool should win here.
Oh yeah I personally fully agree with that -Paladin, mechanically wise- should be more than a Holy Warrior and more of a Warrior imbued by what they deem sacred, whatever that might be. It would expand the class fantasy so much more, so many possibilities. We know Tyrant Velhari isn't a "paladin" but a fel perversion of it, or an analogue, and it's just a cool ass concept.
But that all depends whether Paladin as an archetype remains as restrictive as it has always been, or if rule of cool is brought up. And again, it's not like it would "break" lore, as the whole point is about reframing gameplay archetypes and not retconing the lore of what a paladin is, much like all the NPC analogues we already see in game.
i don't disagree, i prefer the elves from wc3, before all the retcons and stuff, that made me like then more, just can't like then in wow
they would not lose one playable class in the end of the expansion just because their lore/theme went another direction, like, many races can be warlocks and are firmly against fel and dark magic like humans and orcsBesides, to say BE's ditched their reliance on Fel when they still have warlocks, doesn't look accurate at all.
- - - Updated - - -
that is a fact, unless proved otherwise
Unless is exactly like alleria, you cannot claim it is the same so you need to be exactly like alleria, endthere is a third method for void elf transformation, despite Blizzard never, ever showing that there is a third method.
Are you being intentionally dense now? cause i literally just said void elf visual identity change, and you are telling me forsaken visual identity can'tAre you being intentionally dense now? How many times must I repeat that two races sharing a similar silhouette is immaterial to my argument since that is not something I'm arguing about!? I'm not talking about "races sharing silhouettes", I'm talking about a playable race's own visual identity. You keep attacking an argument I never made and ignore the one I'm actually making.
again, double standats
the official canon is that she get her voidform and every other major void elf power after sucking the naaru, again, your headcanon that she already had voidform and she only got the ability to creat portals -despite both being the void elf signature racials - is just bonkers, you are living in your own dreamLet it be on record that you are ignoring official canon lore and supplanting it with your own head canon of which you have no conclusive evidence of. Locus Walker specifically says "take the power of the portals" so it can "be her weapon" in the very same fight that precedes the "let's test your new powers" line.
it was, just like others void elves,, unless again, you have something to show otherwiseCould that moment be the moment Alleria also acquired the ability to take on a void form? It could, yes
there is no evidence against that because it is the truth LOL.That is not what appeal to ignorance is. An appeal to ignorance is to assert an idea as FACT because there is no evidence against it. It is what you are doing when you say that "it's a fact" that Alleria acquired the ability to take on a void form when she absorbed the naaru. Because there is no evidence against it.
it is not, again,a hypoteis need to be testable, you need to have something to base off, you hve nothing, you are just making this up to support your argument.No, it's not. Not in this case. You cannot say something does not exist just because you can't see it. The idea that Alleria may have already known how to transform but did not do so until absorbing the naaru is a valid hypothesis.
nothing suggest that, nothing implies that, nothing even hint that, evrything lead to he gaining those stuff, including her voidform, aftr the naaru.
one is a racial the other is a priest ability, sharing name does't make the thing the sameThey are? Prove it, then. Show me the official lore or developer quote that states the two are "completely different things".
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Voidform
Activated by casting Void Eruption. Twists your Shadowform with the powers of the Void, increasing spell damage you deal by 10%, reducing the cooldown on Mind Blast by 1.5 sec, and granting an additional 0.5% Haste every 1 sec.
Your Insanity will drain increasingly fast until it reaches 0 and Voidform ends.2 different thingsEntropic Embrace is a passive racial ability for all void elves, providing a chance for your abilities to empower you with the essence of the Void.
Has a 33% chance to proc, the buff gained also has a 1 minute internal cooldown.
The buff does not grant a flat 5% damage boost, it causes all attacks made during the duration to also deal 5% of that attack as shadowfrost damage in a separate action.
Alleria Windrunner has a similar form that she gained after draining the dark naaru L'ura, but unlike Entropic Embrace's passive effect, Alleria can transform at will.
no you gonna say they are the same doing different things because "it is a vallid hypotesis"
because it was, you are using now the perfectionist fallacy, you do not want believe in somethign that is truth because there is no "oficial statement"Again, you are ironically engaging in this "appeal to ignorance" fallacy you accuse me of when you state, as fact, that Alleria acquired her ability to transform into a void form the moment she absorbed the naaru, considering there is no official statement dictating so.
again false equivalences, her new voidform was something she gained aft sucking the naaru, thats why they show imeediately after it, if she already knew she would pop up to fight it, again, compltely nonsensical "hypothesis" just trying to support your nonsense argument that elves should be like her.Not really. At no point in the questing campaign in Argus it was required for Alleria to take on the void form. And as for mentioning it, again, why should it have been mentioned? When has Anduin ever mentioned "hey, did you know I can resurrect thousands of people at the same time in the middle of combat?" or Sylvanas saying "hey, did you know I can turn into an incorporeal banshee without losing my physical body?" before demonstrating said abilities?
you are making shit up trying to disregard something w lready know as truthPlease read the difference between offering an alternative explanation (i.e. what I'm doing) and asserting an explanation as true while declaring all others as false (i.e. what you're doing).
That's not confirmation bias. At all. You're trying to be fancy throwing different fallacy names toward me, but none stick because none applies to what I'm doing, here. What I'm saying is that Alleria transforming into a void form at that moment in time in no way proves as a fact that was the moment she acquired the ability to transform.
everything came from the naary LOL, its the very void elf racials, if she got one she got the other, stop cherry pickingConsidering it's the dark naaru itself creating the portals, I think it's not that illogical to think that the ability to summon portals came from the fallen naaru. And as for "everything", that is a claim you have to prove. And so far, you haven't. For all your accusations that I "don't have canon evidence", you so far failed to prove a single shred of evidence that points to the idea that Alleria could only transform after absorbing L'ura's energies.
Humans have warlocks as well, but it's made clear that they operate outside normal society. I can imagine the same holds true for Blood Elves, especially after they saw what using fel did to Kael'thas.
I also don't think fel usage is or ever was an iconic aspect of Blood Elves. The Blood Elves may originally have been designed as fel junkies but that was very quickly retconned to "normal mana" junkies, down playing their reliance on fel. Most Blood Elves never actively used fel or drained fel energy.
"I guess only blood elves feel like the odd man out for the Horde. I hope that we've engineered that into it as deftly as we could, but you know, it's the equivalent of a bunch of white chicks hanging out with goblin or tauren. It's weird." -- Chris Metzen
I feel like you're putting wayyyy too much importance on fel and it's position within blood elf society. It was literally a phase they went through (and by they I don't even mean all of blood elf society) for a short period, and shortly thereafter they quickly returned to their roots. It's like you're attempting to define them by one phase throughout their entire existence, despite the fact that the phase was short lived and for the most part they returned to their "standard" practices. Yes the fel created a slight physical change (as is apparent in their eyes), but the cultural implications were far less and for the most part their culture has remained the same. Why push so hard for "felblood" options when that was never a part of the blood elven society that are playable, and based on the little exposure they did have to fel it simply resulted in green eyes (not felblood elves). And DH should remain their own separate thing.
Blood elves have other aspects that should take priority over "fel" options. These include farstrider options (tattoos similar to Alleria who was a farstrider, feathers, braided hair options), magister options (tattoos similar to Rommath, runic markings like the box cover art), blood knight options (golden phoenix tattoos??, golden glowing hair??). In addition, dark ranger options should be made available... though I'd be fine with this becoming a forsaken customization option (though logisitcally it'd make more sense to just give BE the options as the model already exists).
Last edited by Strippling; 2020-11-01 at 12:39 PM.
Blood elves are our high elves - Chris Metzen
This is not how facts work, Syegfryed. A fact isn't a fact "because it wasn't proven otherwise". A fact is a fact because it has been PROVEN to be a fact. 1+1=2 is a fact not because people haven't proven that 1+1=11 or 1+1=apple. 1+1=2 is a fact because it has been proven to be a fact.
To say "it's a fact unless proven otherwise" is to state your headcanon as fact. It's to say "I have a magical two-headed invisible pink unicorn living in my backyard that only reveals itself to those it finds worthy. And that's a fact because you cannot prove it otherwise."
Again, no. I'm talking about the silhouettes when I talk about visual identity. You'd know that if you bothered to read my posts in which I repeat the word "silhouette" over and over and over and over again.Are you being intentionally dense now? cause i literally just said void elf visual identity change, and you are telling me forsaken visual identity can't
again, double standats
Wrong. You're asserting your headcanon as "official canon", because nowhere at all it says that it was eating the fallen naaru's energies that gave Alleria the power to transform. Nothing in the game's lore, nothing in the books, and nothing from Blizzard developer interviews or tweets.the official canon is that she get her voidform and every other major void elf power after sucking the naaru,
First: both void form and spatial rift being the void elf's racial abilities in no way proves that Alleria bot both at the same time from eating the fallen naaru's energies.again, your headcanon that she already had voidform and she only got the ability to creat portals -despite both being the void elf signature racials - is just bonkers, you are living in your own dream
Two: again you demean my hypothesis, calling it "bonkers" this time, and yet again you do it without ever explaining why it's "bonkers" or "nonsensical" or "absurd". It feels you're just trying to sweep my hypothesis under the rug. An hypothesis, mind you, that is perfectly possibly within the current canon lore presented so far.
Again: a fact is not a fact because it hasn't been proven otherwise. A fact is a fact because it has been proven to be a fact. Something you have not done at all so far. You only asserted it's a fact, with zero evidence.it was, just like others void elves,, unless again, you have something to show otherwise
Again, that is not how "truth" or "facts" work, dude. Truths are not truths because they haven't been proven to be false, but rather because they have been proven to be truths, and nothing in the game proves your headcanon as true.there is no evidence against that because it is the truth LOL.
Wrong. A fact needs to be testable to confirm it is a fact. A hypothesis is not deemed "false" just because it cannot be tested. An example?it is not, again,a hypoteis need to be testable, you need to have something to base off, you hve nothing, you are just making this up to support your argument.
nothing suggest that, nothing implies that, nothing even hint that, evrything lead to he gaining those stuff, including her voidform, aftr the naaru.
"I hypothesize that no planet within the andromeda galaxy is populated by technologically advanced civilizations."
"Is there any way we can test that hypothesis?"
"No"
"Then all planets within the andromeda galaxy is populated by technologically advanced civilizations."
This is your logic regarding our debate, here. An hypothesis that cannot be tested is just that: a hypothesis, a possibility. If it can be tested, then it stops being a hypothesis and becomes either a false statement or a true statement. I.e., a lie or a fact, respectively.
So what's the relevance that one is a class ability and the other is a racial ability? You're basically saying an ability that transforms you into a void form is not the same as an ability that does the exact same thing, i.e., transforming you into a void form... and not giving a single explanation as to why they're not the same thing. In-game tooltips that describe the mechanical functionality of an ability are not lore.one is a racial the other is a priest ability, sharing name does't make the thing the same
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Voidform
Prove it.again false equivalences, her new voidform was something she gained aft sucking the naaru,
That's not conclusive evidence.thats why they show imeediately after it,
Not really. At no point Alleria has ever been in grave danger to require using it. In fact, some of her lines indicate that Alleria has at first resisted using using more of the void:f she already knew she would pop up to fight it,
Alleria Windrunner says: "I have not turned away from that path. You know why I resisted."
Also, think a little about what you've said: you're claiming Alleria could only transform after eating the fallen energies of the Naaru. That implies that transforming a blood/high elf into a void elf requires the energies of a fallen naaru, which you have admitted are incredibly rare. According to you, the energies of a fallen demigod are not enough to trigger the void elf transformation, which is what Nhal'athoth is:
Locus-Walker says: "The heart of a demigod. This is no mere token, Alleria."
So how are more void elves coming to be?
NO ONE KNOWS THE TRUTH because the truth has never been stated. You're asserting your headcanons as facts, here. Which is incredibly ironic considering you're dismissing my hypothesis because they're "headcanon". Actually, twice as incredibly ironic considering that's a huge double-standard from you, considering you're constantly accusing me of double-standards here. Erroneously, too, I might add.you are making shit up trying to disregard something w lready know as truth
"Everything came from the naaru."everything came from the naary LOL, its the very void elf racials,
"It's the very void elf racials."
Are you saying the void elves are consuming fallen naarus, then?
Prove it. Your headcanons are not facts.if she got one she got the other, stop cherry picking
"Torturing someone is not an evil thing to do if it is done for good reasons" by Varodoc
"You sit in OG/SW waiting on a Mythic+ queue" by Altmer <- Oh, the pearls in this forum...
"They sort of did this Dragonriding, which ushered in the Dracthyr race." by Teriz <- the BS some people reach for their narratives...
"I guess only blood elves feel like the odd man out for the Horde. I hope that we've engineered that into it as deftly as we could, but you know, it's the equivalent of a bunch of white chicks hanging out with goblin or tauren. It's weird." -- Chris Metzen
"Torturing someone is not an evil thing to do if it is done for good reasons" by Varodoc
"You sit in OG/SW waiting on a Mythic+ queue" by Altmer <- Oh, the pearls in this forum...
"They sort of did this Dragonriding, which ushered in the Dracthyr race." by Teriz <- the BS some people reach for their narratives...
I'm pretty sure that line is telling Alleria to take the power of the portals as in "absorb their void energy", not "take the power to open portals" because we clearly see Alleria already opening Void Portals long before she has her encounters with Nhal'athoth and L'ura.
"Torturing someone is not an evil thing to do if it is done for good reasons" by Varodoc
"You sit in OG/SW waiting on a Mythic+ queue" by Altmer <- Oh, the pearls in this forum...
"They sort of did this Dragonriding, which ushered in the Dracthyr race." by Teriz <- the BS some people reach for their narratives...
Before we meet up with Locus Walker, when we're escorting Arkhaan through Mac'aree. He goes all bonkers and she opens a portal into the Void so we can follow him. Then we fight him and kill him. Then Locus Walker shows up. Then Alleria opens another portal that lets you slip through the Void unseen by the ethereals as you gather info from quest clickies and meet them on the other side.
She kinda does it a lot actually.
Actually, your first claim she made a portal, the portal was actually created by Arkhaan himself, and you can see it here. The portal persists, as seen here, and you go through it with Alleria, and it is Locus-Walker that pulls you and Alleria out of the void.
As for your second claim, the portal was made by Locus-Walker. Well, we're not actually shown him creating the portal, as when we get there the portal is already there, but it is behind him and not behind Alleria, and Locus Walker wants Alleria and you to go through the portal with him because he wants to "show her something". So all that heavily implies that it was him that opened said portal, not her.
"Torturing someone is not an evil thing to do if it is done for good reasons" by Varodoc
"You sit in OG/SW waiting on a Mythic+ queue" by Altmer <- Oh, the pearls in this forum...
"They sort of did this Dragonriding, which ushered in the Dracthyr race." by Teriz <- the BS some people reach for their narratives...
Hmmm.. I believe your recounting of events is more accurate than mine. I still don't think Locus Walker's directive to drain the portals meant draining the ability to open portals (that doesn't make sense to me). I think he meant draining the portals to close them so they stop spitting out mobs, not attain some sort of ability to open them. Still your recounting does bring into question just when Alleria gained the ability to open portals. Since I haven't read A Thousand Years of War I can't say for certain what she has done before we meet her in Argus.
Last edited by Kyriani; 2020-11-02 at 02:53 PM.
it is proven that the ability to transform in a voidforfm is due to her eating the dark naaru, period, you think what we have is nto enough is completely you own problem
you said silhouette isn't the point, then you said is visual identify and now is silhouette all over again, it doesn't matter how you spin it, its pointless, you are using double standards, 2 different races share silhouettes and visual identity across factions, one race already have 2 visual identities, and you are trying to say they can't do that with forsake because ~~reasons~~Again, no. I'm talking about the silhouettes when I talk about visual identity. You'd know that if you bothered to read my posts in which I repeat the word "silhouette" over and over and over and over again.
As i said a hypothesis need either a way to test it or need to be based on something, you don't have both, you can't test what you proposed and you have nothing as baseWrong. A fact needs to be testable to confirm it is a fact. A hypothesis is not deemed "false" just because it cannot be tested. An example?
you are saying they are the same just because they "voidform" come on now, you did better than thatSo what's the relevance that one is a class ability and the other is a racial ability? You're basically saying an ability that transforms you into a void form is not the same as an ability that does the exact same thing, i.e., transforming you into a void form...
and not giving a single explanation as to why they're not the same thing. In-game tooltips that describe the mechanical functionality of an ability are not lore.
Again, not going to keep playing your game, you can stay with your ~~hypothesis~~ and double standarts, we already got our quota in this topic