All this verbosity and you can't even address the fact that Blood Elves have been part of the Horde for 14 years, against the 2 they were not on it in WoW.
Your premise is based on a flawed and inaccurate perception of faction identity, you saw the problem of Blizzard trying to force dichotomous aesthetic identity between factions -which was dumb on the first place- and decided that the solution is to double down on that nonsense, and determine what aesthetics and themes "belong" to which faction.
Again, your premise is based around the idea that blood elves and Nightborne identity -elven themes- are alliance themes. That's just not accurate to put it mildly. Your whole argument starts with a supposition, one that you are doing zero work to even build and just pretend everyone follow along because you think it's true.
With little evidence, go on claiming that the alliance is more excited about Night Elves and high elves rather than any other races, and at this point is just clear
you just want more elven thematic predominance on the Alliance.
This is all about what you want and you keep wasting everyone's time by making these long ass responses -you wanna tire people out? Because you are not doing it for clarity's sake, circling around the same poor arguments over and over- Cause again, it seems that you can't accept that "elven" themes don't belong to either faction, and instead -without making a compelling argument- claim they belong to the alliance.
All of that, because for all you dislike that there are so many elven themes on the Horde, you agree with Blizzard's nonsense of enforcing aesthetic differences between factions
over the very lore they have written.
And to top it all, fail to see any nuance to what "elven" themes even are, when it's pretty clear alliance elves and horde elves have distinct identities.
Just say you are salty because the Horde has the fanciest elves and the Alliance doesn't and go.
And you know, what irks me the most about your endless argumentation is that's just a selfish and shallow want that you keep trying to "justify", when it would be far more sympathetic if you were honest about it and asked for fancier elves on the alliance -such a Highborne- instead of being an ass and trying to tell people elven identities don't belong on the Horde -you know, where they have been for the last decade and a half?-
- - - Updated - - -
Yet there's a serious overlap now, so BE and Worgen are not the exception anymore with more AR further blurring the perceived dichotomy. Of course there are some themes that feel wholly Horde/Alliance -mostly related to orcs and humans, and it makes sense- but there's clearly more of an spectrum of identities/themes regarding to faction rather than a dichotomous binary.
And even while I don't think that -perhaps humans and orcs- any race's themes belong to either faction, the
Fancy Elf theme has always been more of a Horde thing holistically, High Elves in War2, and later Night Elves, were always framed as closer to nature, while the Horde's elves are definitely the aspects of their cultures that are more sumptuous and elegant.
@
ravenmoon keeps claiming elven themes belong to the alliance, when he fails to even address this difference and instead tries to group all the "elven themes" as one thing, when the differences between, say, Night Elves and Nightborne is self evident. So while Elves were part of the alliance first, the Fancy and Elegant Elf was never a theme specific to the alliance as it is to the Horde.
Which IMO? Kinda moot, because I don't even agree we need strongly enforced thematic and aesthetic dichotomy for every racial group-but if you are going to use it as an argument, you gotta put all the facts on the table