1. #23561
    Quote Originally Posted by FossilFree View Post
    Blizzard often says no to things and then turns around and does them anyways. I think the "no" is just a distraction so they can surprise everyone later on and say "see, we listened!"
    Fans change their minds.

    Why do you think there is such crazy fan wrestling over certain features and advances?

    If it’s popular amongst the fans that means fans would play more and pay more. At a certain point it becomes more profitable to do than not.

    Anything that would make you play more and buy more us a win. They come up with things, but they also look to what the community wants.

    Why do you think blood elves have it so good? Because they have a network of hardcore fans pouring endless amounts of time talking up the race and ensuring any fan things that threaten or undermine it never happen because of the negticity they can engineer socially through their conversation.

    It’s all to get blizzard to do what they want because they know blizzard monitors these things.

    Good luck to them. It takes a lot of effort.

    You’d have gotten high elves a lot sooner if it wasn’t so heavily opposed by the BElf fan club.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Of which I am a proud member btw.

  2. #23562
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    Yes. It's also the reason why in MOBAs the developers prioritize popular heroes when making new skins, rather than unpopular or barely played heroes. Same thing here.

    For example, League of Legends players complain that Ahri and Lux always get new skins while some champions haven't gotten new skins in years, but that's just logic. These two champions are very popular so the developers want to monetize them as much as possible.

    You don't need to study Economy at university to understand that making a product that will be consumed by 1000 people is better than making a product that will be consumed by 10 people.
    I notice you keep ignoring the responses from people who want some options for Nightborne, who have gotten NOTHING while the VE have gotten lots. Then Nightborne would be a lot more popular if we could make them not look like hideous abominations.

  3. #23563
    Quote Originally Posted by Mungho View Post
    I notice you keep ignoring the responses from people who want some options for Nightborne, who have gotten NOTHING while the VE have gotten lots. Then Nightborne would be a lot more popular if we could make them not look like hideous abominations.
    Buddy I don't give a shit about Nightborne, that's why I don't care about any Nightborne suggestion. I can answer you people if you want but it's Blizzard you need to get the attention of, not me.

  4. #23564
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    Yes. It's also the reason why in MOBAs the developers prioritize popular heroes when making new skins, rather than unpopular or barely played heroes. Same thing here.

    For example, League of Legends players complain that Ahri and Lux always get new skins while some champions haven't gotten new skins in years, but that's just logic. These two champions are very popular so the developers want to monetize them as much as possible.

    You don't need to study Economy at university to understand that making a product that will be consumed by 1000 people is better than making a product that will be consumed by 10 people.
    I totally agree with you. It's their business and it's all about money. Gamers can call it passion but your passion monetaze verywell. And developers will widely open those doors through which they can involve more and more new gamers.

  5. #23565
    Deleted. It was a little petty.
    Last edited by HateTrain; 2021-05-28 at 07:25 PM.

  6. #23566
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    Yes. It's also the reason why in MOBAs the developers prioritize popular heroes when making new skins, rather than unpopular or barely played heroes. Same thing here.

    For example, League of Legends players complain that Ahri and Lux always get new skins while some champions haven't gotten new skins in years, but that's just logic. These two champions are very popular so the developers want to monetize them as much as possible.

    You don't need to study Economy at university to understand that making a product that will be consumed by 1000 people is better than making a product that will be consumed by 10 people.
    What you’re doing is mistaking your overblown passion for the race for a common perception. The thing is that most people seem to select Void Elves chiefly because they have a useful aesthetic. It seems like you dramatically overestimate the interest held in the race for reasons beyond their attractive skeletons and appearances relative to other races, much less the other human-like races

    What I’m saying is there exists little evident passion for the race itself. You can see this by how quickly discussion about them seem to swiftly falter or be pivoted away from.

    I’d argue that it would be far more unpopular among those who actually afford interest in the lore or identity to continue to provide options to a single race as a priority, much less while keeping them away from a race which is extremely popular in terms of lore, yet is mostly left unplayed due to an underwhelming model. It is likely that far less attraction would be given to the Void Elves for new customization options than it would be for Nightborne.

    Finally, the economic opportunity cost from not giving the Void Elves new customization efforts is pretty much minimal. Very few players would be so comically obsessive as to unsubscribe over such things, and the increase in race changes or boosts wouldn’t be too considerable. In fact, an updated Nightborne model would likely draw more money in race changes because of the number of people who seem to have interest in the race yet do not play them because of how unfortunate the models are - plus, there’s less incentive to boost them because their heritage armor is the only armor that looks half-decent on them.

  7. #23567
    Quote Originally Posted by Lahis View Post
    Well VE already got better deal than Pandaren. They got what, 2 more hairstyles?
    Nah, like most races they got 3 new options across the board (hair color, skin color, hair style) but they didn't get new extra options as jewelry I think, but some new mustaches and beards, and the separation of each.

    Some races did get more extra options, but overall all Core Races got 3x3 new things on the least.

    And while it's lovely that we got new skin colors on VE's, all the "new" stuff they got were reused assets from Blood Elves, except for the specific purple VE eye color -then again, several other AR's got their eye colors decoupled and as unique options-

    I do agree that in terms of possibilities VE's got more options and I am glad for those, but they really are overall just reused BE stuff.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Lina1 View Post
    I totally agree with you. It's their business and it's all about money. Gamers can call it passion but your passion monetaze verywell. And developers will widely open those doors through which they can involve more and more new gamers.
    I mean TBH they would make more money if they sold hair dyes.

    The outrage tho!

  8. #23568
    I am Murloc! FlubberPuddy's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    On the frontline
    Posts
    5,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Beloren View Post
    Why do you think blood elves have it so good? Because they have a network of hardcore fans pouring endless amounts of time talking up the race and ensuring any fan things that threaten or undermine it never happen because of the negticity they can engineer socially through their conversation.
    Except for High Elves on Alliance apparently. Still glad Blizzard's answer was 'give it to both factions'.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Le Conceptuel View Post
    What you’re doing is mistaking your overblown passion for the race for a common perception. The thing is that most people seem to select Void Elves chiefly because they have a useful aesthetic. It seems like you dramatically overestimate the interest held in the race for reasons beyond their attractive skeletons and appearances relative to other races, much less the other human-like races

    Finally, the economic opportunity cost from not giving the Void Elves new customization efforts is pretty much minimal. Very few players would be so comically obsessive as to unsubscribe over such things, and the increase in race changes or boosts wouldn’t be too considerable. In fact, an updated Nightborne model would likely draw more money in race changes because of the number of people who seem to have interest in the race yet do not play them because of how unfortunate the models are - plus, there’s less incentive to boost them because their heritage armor is the only armor that looks half-decent on them.
    I don't think they are mistaking their passion for perception. Void Elves were(are?) the most popular Allied Race compared to the others, literally due to sharing the Blood Elf/High Elf model aka Thalassian model (which in itself is the most popular player race model to date).

    On release of their availability there were so so so so many Void Elves both immediately at 110 and also in dungeon finder. To the point where lots of early dungeon finder was filled with full Void Elf parties and also that you could see many Void Elves during the Legion Argus invasion thingys. Nightborne were essentially the same on Horde side (and you'd have dungeon finder filled with Blood Elves/Nightborne parties).

    People just love their elves!

    Also strange to imply in beginning that it's the poster's own opinion bias and then in the last paragraph utilize your own opinion bias. I think the fact is that Nightborne can definitely use more customization improvement, but hands down the most popular player model is the Thalassian model - that's just a fact.

    Also 99% of people pick their races for looks. It's evident for Blood Elves especially since their origins from Blizzard's own mouth that they were made for Asian players' gfs to have pretty characters to the fact that when High Elves were asked for many BE fans didn't realize that BEs themselves would hate to be called High Elves.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Necrosaro123 View Post
    1198 pages of "I want blonde, blue eyed elves that look exactly like the blood elves, but they are available for the Alliance, just because i say so. Trust me Blizzard".

    If you want Blonde elves go Horde. If you want Dark Elves, go Alliance.

    The End.
    This is so 2019. Now we're simply 1 hair dye away in 2021.

  9. #23569
    Quote Originally Posted by Geisl View Post
    Except for High Elves on Alliance apparently. Still glad Blizzard's answer was 'give it to both factions'.

    .
    Well you guys won that one, but it took the forum equivalent of blood , sweat and tears, eventually you simply just wore us out, it came to a point I didn't even care, if you wanted it that badly, whatever.. but I still remember Mace's point that alliance high elves would actually make little difference to the horde, because they were already strong as blood elves.. i think it was after that i realised it wasn't so big a deal.

    Still, I would have preferred it if the alliance never got high elves, and the horde never got Nightborne. The blood elves should have been the exclusive elves on the horde, and void elves shoudl always have been purple.. i would have preferred, the alliance known for purple elves - whether void, nightborne or night elf, and the horde known for pale skinned elves.. even with high elves still on the alliance as non-playable.

    But what I would have preferred is irrelevant. I don't mind them having their high elves, in fact i think at this point it would be healthier for the game. But i think it's because i'm in favour of faction removal lines.. once blood elves came to the horde, faction distinction became superficial mostly. They should have embraced that and re-evaluated the heavy emphasis on them which has cost them SO much quality story. They write the faction more like a race or empire, and it just covers all the good individuality of the races, which is probably the most special thing about wow's storyline. It stops them from writing good stories and varied stories.. they become predictable because you know that the blood elves, tauren, orcs, trolls, etc will always be horde, the alliance is even more boring.. so it just ends up being a blue versus red crazy focus, which makes no sense in the manner they've done it. How can you work together so often, and yet still be fighting each other in such fine divided lines?

    Their creators lack vision, even though they have creativity, you need vision as well, not just to project a story for the future, but to handle things with the restrictions the game systems demand. Can you think of any way we could have had far more fluid movement of the races, while still restricting players of certain races to a faction? I can think of aa few.

    There most basic error, si making most non-native horde and alliance races fully invested in their factions.

    Night elves, Draenei, Blood elves, Forsaken - are 4 major races that should not be involved with the factions. But rather have a small group that fight for them, while the rest of the race, continue in to influence the story. But what did blizzard do? they tied them all wholeheartedly into the factions - and that's just terrible. The night elves didn't even get an explanation, the Draenei shouldn't be so involved with the alliance, but rather the light and what it stands for. The blood elves had a good story that explained why they would partner with the horde, but after 2.4, they should have left it. game would have been much more interesting with a Draenei and blood elf friendship, despite them having factions with them batting for the alliance and horde.

    In such a context, your high elf wishes would not have been problematic. it is because the horde must be different from the each other - and yet, by putting blood elves in the horde, they made the alliance and horde more like each other, yet continued to be so super restricted. And so you have a perfect example of lacking vision and understanding, despite being talented and creative.
    Last edited by Beloren; 2021-05-29 at 07:27 AM.

  10. #23570
    The Lightbringer Ardenaso's Avatar
    3+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    3,097
    now that High Elves are on the Alliance, I still don't know why Blizzard refuses to give Alteraci Human for the Horde
    The Alliance gets the Horde's most popular race. The Horde should get the Alliance's most popular race in return. Alteraci Humans for the Horde!

    I make Warcraft 3 Reforged HD custom models and I'm also an HD model reviewer.

  11. #23571
    Quote Originally Posted by Le Conceptuel View Post
    What you’re doing is mistaking your overblown passion for the race for a common perception. The thing is that most people seem to select Void Elves chiefly because they have a useful aesthetic. It seems like you dramatically overestimate the interest held in the race for reasons beyond their attractive skeletons and appearances relative to other races, much less the other human-like races

    What I’m saying is there exists little evident passion for the race itself. You can see this by how quickly discussion about them seem to swiftly falter or be pivoted away from.

    I’d argue that it would be far more unpopular among those who actually afford interest in the lore or identity to continue to provide options to a single race as a priority, much less while keeping them away from a race which is extremely popular in terms of lore, yet is mostly left unplayed due to an underwhelming model. It is likely that far less attraction would be given to the Void Elves for new customization options than it would be for Nightborne.

    Finally, the economic opportunity cost from not giving the Void Elves new customization efforts is pretty much minimal. Very few players would be so comically obsessive as to unsubscribe over such things, and the increase in race changes or boosts wouldn’t be too considerable. In fact, an updated Nightborne model would likely draw more money in race changes because of the number of people who seem to have interest in the race yet do not play them because of how unfortunate the models are - plus, there’s less incentive to boost them because their heritage armor is the only armor that looks half-decent on them.
    What you said has literally nothing to do with my argument. I haven't mentioned the reasons why Void Elves are popular once in this discussion, because that's not the point. The reasons are irrelevant, Void Elves are the most popular allied race.

    And I think I'll trust Blizzard and common sense when they say that the economic opportunity is much higher if you give options to popular races instead of unpopular races.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ardenaso View Post
    now that High Elves are on the Alliance, I still don't know why Blizzard refuses to give Alteraci Human for the Horde
    Because High Elves have been in the Alliance since WC2, while Alterac left the Horde at the end of the Second War and was destroyed, and its remnants started enslaving orcs?
    Last edited by Varodoc; 2021-05-29 at 09:46 AM.

  12. #23572
    Quote Originally Posted by Ardenaso View Post
    now that High Elves are on the Alliance, I still don't know why Blizzard refuses to give Alteraci Human for the Horde
    Are Alterasci even a thing? Once a nation is destroyed, what do you think happens ? The survivors get absorbed into other nations who also claim their territories for themselves

    Only if they had surviving leaders that still held up the banner or the nation had a strong national identity or pride so they keep their identity alive even under occupation.

    This is why conquering empires always try to eradicate identities either by total cultural shifts or by displacement or eradication.

    The best way to destroy today’s computer to nations is to destroy their national identity and individuality.

    To make them your empire you have to get them to think more of your federation than of their own individual nations. Unify their culture. These are far more important than military conquest.

    You see, Hitler went about it the wrong way, the EU is going about it the right way, and if not for the U.K. backing out it would have been all but a done deal by now.

    The U.K. has set the timetable back a lot. And now the nations want to start thinking for themselves separately. It’s annoying to those in charge of it.

  13. #23573
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    Void Elves are the most popular allied race.
    Are they? Do we have any recent data on this? Last I heard vulpera had taken the spot for number 1 allied race. Admittedly even that used incomplete data from warcraft realms I believe.

    I'd agree that void elves are the most popular Alliance allied race, but if we're counting both factions, there may be Horde allied races with a bigger population.

  14. #23574
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyriani View Post
    Are they? Do we have any recent data on this? Last I heard vulpera had taken the spot for number 1 allied race. Admittedly even that used incomplete data from warcraft realms I believe.

    I'd agree that void elves are the most popular Alliance allied race, but if we're counting both factions, there may be Horde allied races with a bigger population.
    I thought 3rd parties can no longer track the figures. I can't tell you which is more popular - void elves or vulpera


    All I can say is that this actually makes sense.. I am strangely comforted that the horde's most popular race is not alliance knock off night elves, or any elf for that matter. Vulpera make sense for the horde and i'm glad they're popular. Void elves is the alliance's high elf dream realised. Elves are always popular, but they've never been allt hat is popular.

  15. #23575
    Quote Originally Posted by Beloren View Post
    I thought 3rd parties can no longer track the figures. I can't tell you which is more popular - void elves or vulpera


    All I can say is that this actually makes sense.. I am strangely comforted that the horde's most popular race is not alliance knock off night elves, or any elf for that matter. Vulpera make sense for the horde and i'm glad they're popular. Void elves is the alliance's high elf dream realised. Elves are always popular, but they've never been allt hat is popular.
    I don't think the old way of tracking population that realmpop used to use works anymore, but warcraft realms is still able to with their method. It just requires players to use their addon. It's not an automated process though. The person using the addon has to actually sit there and actively use it for the entire data collection process (you have to constantly click a button that runs through a series of /who's and collects the data). Not surprisingly, few people actually care to sit and do that for long stretches of time and I doubt anyone is willing to risk a ban by using bot to collect such data.

    The information can be collected but people willing to do it, or do it for long, are few and far between making the data collection far less than comprehensive.

  16. #23576
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    What you said has literally nothing to do with my argument. I haven't mentioned the reasons why Void Elves are popular once in this discussion, because that's not the point. The reasons are irrelevant, Void Elves are the most popular allied race.

    And I think I'll trust Blizzard and common sense when they say that the economic opportunity is much higher if you give options to popular races instead of unpopular races.
    When has Blizzard said that? Furthermore, relying only on "common sense" is never sufficient - you have to account for more complex variables, as I did earlier. Notice the final paragraph - more money from race changes is a larger economic gain than anything that could be gained (or kept) from updating Void Elves further.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Geisl View Post
    I don't think they are mistaking their passion for perception. Void Elves were(are?) the most popular Allied Race compared to the others, literally due to sharing the Blood Elf/High Elf model aka Thalassian model (which in itself is the most popular player race model to date).

    On release of their availability there were so so so so many Void Elves both immediately at 110 and also in dungeon finder. To the point where lots of early dungeon finder was filled with full Void Elf parties and also that you could see many Void Elves during the Legion Argus invasion thingys. Nightborne were essentially the same on Horde side (and you'd have dungeon finder filled with Blood Elves/Nightborne parties).

    People just love their elves!

    Also strange to imply in beginning that it's the poster's own opinion bias and then in the last paragraph utilize your own opinion bias. I think the fact is that Nightborne can definitely use more customization improvement, but hands down the most popular player model is the Thalassian model - that's just a fact.

    Also 99% of people pick their races for looks. It's evident for Blood Elves especially since their origins from Blizzard's own mouth that they were made for Asian players' gfs to have pretty characters to the fact that when High Elves were asked for many BE fans didn't realize that BEs themselves would hate to be called High Elves
    That's very much part of my point, actually. The Void Elves offer no economic benefit to further development because they are already popular as is. Encouraging homogeneity will reduce the number of total race changes and boosts - consequently, there is less economic benefit.

  17. #23577
    Quote Originally Posted by Le Conceptuel View Post
    When has Blizzard said that? Furthermore, relying only on "common sense" is never sufficient - you have to account for more complex variables, as I did earlier. Notice the final paragraph - more money from race changes is a larger economic gain than anything that could be gained (or kept) from updating Void Elves further.
    Someone posted what was said here in these last few pages.

    Also, human or elf or undead players aren't going to spend real money to race change to goblin or pandaren just because they got new options lmao. A panda with 20 new hairstyles and hair colours is still a panda.

  18. #23578
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    Someone posted what was said here in these last few pages.

    Also, human or elf or undead players aren't going to spend real money to race change to goblin or pandaren just because they got new options lmao. A panda with 20 new hairstyles and hair colours is still a panda.
    Yes, but the Nightborne in specific are rather popular but also often decried for poor customization options. Void Elves already look find. Pandas and Nightborne are considerably different in terms of appeal and appearance, as well as the amount of people who have been complaining about the look of Nightborne for some time.

  19. #23579
    At this point, I think that all void elves really need in regards to "high elf customization" are a few natural hair color options, and a toggle for their tentacles (either to remove them or replace them with braids). That would basically fulfill the alliance high elf request as much as can be reasonably expected since void elves are now a thing. And that's assuming Blizzard even cares to fulfill the alliance high elf request to that extent. They may very well not care, or even intentionally desire not to.

    Assuming they do care however, after finishing the high elf customization as noted above, I'd say most options going forward from there should be void themed, or flexible enough for anything (like scars for example). What void elves really need now, in my opinion, is more lore development both in game and out. Unlike every other allied race, void elves just kind of... happened... and didn't exist prior to recruitment.

    Alleria's Argus arc was a poor vehicle for the introduction of void elves as a concept, especially since the unlock scenario has the player void elves acquiring their powers in an entirely different fashion than Alleria and looking nothing like her prior to the skin tones being proliferated. More lore development for void elves would help establish them better in game and in other media, as well as perhaps encourage players to appreciate them for being void elves rather than just the closest thing to alliance high elves they can get.
    Last edited by Kyriani; 2021-05-29 at 07:28 PM.

  20. #23580
    As far as I'm concerned, wanting more normal-looking options for Void Elves has nothing to do with "High Elf fantasy". I love imagining my toon as a Void Elf who is using shadow magic to conceal their true appearance, sadly the tentacle hair breaks my immersion.

    But Yeah that has nothing to do with "High Elf fantasy". Alleria Windrunner leader of the Ren'dorei can conceal her true identity as a Void Elf, I've been saying this for years, so it's only fair that the Void Elf toon can do the same thing. Tentacle hair included.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •