I remember you guys saying that when Blizzard extended the amount of posts you could have on your high elf thread on the WoW forums.
Didn't work out.
Because they can't accept the truth so they prefer living a lie, sadly. But hey, I prefer this thread being active rather than seeing 10 threads a day about High Elves x_x
No, high elves are requested by few vocal fanboys, who have their echo chamber on official forums, where they upvote themselves for bigger visibility. They would certainly not threathen faction balance. Also if the blood elves are the only thing, that keeps players to play horde, then void elves should be enough to cause massive migration, because these void elves are cooler and better than bland high elves.
Here's something to think about. There was some discussion about using the Highvale settlement as a reference for a High Elf culture separate from that of the Blood Elves, and I had some thoughts about the idea.
In the existing cross faction allied races, in the process of becoming different from the race they're based on, they give up access to that race's most iconic class. Void elves lose access to paladins, Nightborne lose access to druids. Warlocks for High Elves are right out, of course, but the Sunwell was a font of arcane energy, not fel. If they didn't get enough arcane energy, explaining a high elf mage becomes very difficult, and if the distinction is to be drawn based on their relationship with magic, would you still accept a high elf without access to mages? In that situation, I see the only reasonable class choices to be warrior, paladin, hunter, rogue, priest, and monk. They'd still need visual changes to be focused on physical rather than magical, but if you push that fantasy to the extreme, perhaps there is room for them to exist in a game that already has Blood Elves.
I recognize that's not going to be a popular idea, but if your goal is to make them thematically different, half measures won't do. I think they would have to truly hate magic to oppose Blood Elves to the same degree that Void Elves and Nightborne do their counterparts. That said, I still think that space is crowded now that Void Elves are already in the game.
I'm not necessarily against that, as long as the result is something that is both visually and thematically different from a Blood Elf. Since Blood Elves aren't going to change, that difference has to come out of the High Elf side.
Nightborne are 10000 years removed from night elves, just like high elves are 10000 years removed from night elves. They're not actually the same race.
I enjoyed your ogre analogy for the creativity, but it has some key differences relative to the High Elf/Blood Elf situation. The Blood Elves playable in game didn't change their aesthetics when they became Blood Elves. They're just WoW's interpretation of High Elves, plus some green eyes and a new love for the color red. If you're asking for the race as it was imagined in another game, it'll just be incompatible with the way High Elves and Blood Elves exist in WoW. That specific storyline already has an in-game representation that is bound in place by playable Blood Elves. It might be frustrating, because it doesn't leave space for what you want, but it's a decision that has already been made.
You can still get parts of what you want: a connection to the story continued through some transformation, a new race with some of the features of the race's interpretation from another game, etc. You just can't have both, because the High Elves are already playable in the form of Blood Elves (with insignificant changes according to the lore), and playable races don't change.
And as soon as that thing reaches it's goal they are aaaall going to believe that Blizzard will FINALLY listen to them! All 500 of them!
And then get denied. '.' And I bet if we made a petition about not allowing elves, even if it becomes much bigger than that, they will go to their discord and try find ways to ban us.
Edit: ACTUALLY, is it possible to sign a petition with more than one Email per person? Because I BET that is what is going on if that's the case o_o
Last edited by Sigxy; 2018-04-30 at 10:03 AM.
There are a lot of BE fans on the Horde side. If the alliance gets cooler blonde sexy elves then why would they play Horde? VEs are apparently not cooler. I think they are but after seeing all these High Elf threads maybe they were ultimately deemed to not be slutmong-able.
if the Horde has that many rerolls to Alliance due to High Elves, than the Horde has a much more serious problem. From what we know of Allied Races, there is very little chance that more than 7% of all the Blood Elf characters will reroll as High Elves. Why? Because that would equal roughly all the combine Allied Race character currently on Live. Also one should realize that more rerolls will probably be from the Alliance to High Elf anyway. Mostly from Human and Night Elf players that couldn't roll a High Elf (because screw playing on the Horde, right lol?). Also some of the people that already rerolled or made Void Elves because they though that was as close as they were going to get to playing an Alliance High Elf. People that have Night Elves with names like XXLegololsXX would definitely reroll as a High Elf, if they bother completing the grind and unlock quests to get them.
The grind to unlock the Allied Races is the biggest roadblock to any potential population swings. It takes effort to get an Allied Race and most people can't be bothered to rep grind for two or three months to play some random elf. So I don't image the population to shift much at all, with maybe one or two percent of the Horde Players rolling High Elves, with a similar or maybe slightly greater number of Alliance players rolling High Elves as well. That would put High Elves at I suppose Gnome levels of characters on Live. The faction balance doesn't shift hardly at all (because some Alliance players are going to switch over to Zandalari Trolls or Vulpera). And if it does shift, it will be by about 1%.
The only other reason that the Horde might lose more of its Blood Elf population would be due to their racial not being OP anymore. And that doesn't mean they will roll Alliance....just whatever is OP at the moment. That would have nothing to do with High Elves.
Last edited by Ithekro; 2018-04-30 at 10:34 AM.
The number argument has been debunked because void elvens because their are just more named high elves and high elf settlement.
They look to mutch like blood elf argument is also debunked because again void elves. In full armor you can only tell them apart by the colour of their name blue for green for friendly. And red orange or yellow for hostile.
They blur the line between factions. Well so do pandaren. And before you say "blizzard have stated that they aren't satisfied with how pandaren turned out".
Well blizzard also isn't satisfied with flying in game. And we all know how that turned out. The genie is out the bottle with flying, and the Genie is out the bottle with the blurred faction via the pandaren.
So to revue
1: The numbers argument is moot, because not just void elves but lightforged break that criteria
2: They look to mutch like bloodelves argument is moot. Because again void elves break that criteria so do nightborne if you want stretch it. To me it just that more effort was put in horde allied races, as opposed the alliance ones.
3: They blur the line between factions argument is moot because Pandaren, Void elves, Nightborne break that rule. And the Pandaren part of that statement gets compounded by the flying argument.
so all that remains is the true reason:
They (Blizzard) just don't want too
But they will never admit that because they don't like using finality because that limits their options. And would stop them using it as a selling point for a future expantion when subs drop again.
Last edited by bowlink; 2018-04-30 at 10:43 AM.
All the positives are going to happen if you do what I want, and none of the negative. See these arguments? They can't be argued with. Why? Logic. What was my logic? I said it. Here's a wowhead article, high elves are happening.![]()
Blizzard's position should have been long clear, though. Them thinking High Elves aren't distinct enough, is the main reason Void Elves were created. To meet the Alliance demand for pale elves, while giving them a gimmick different from the Blood Elves. There's 4 playable elf types now. There's not going to be another now.
Blizzard's response was clearly meant to put this discussion to rest. I love WoWHead, but them fueling it again with this opinion piece doesn't really feel... professional.
I didn't say it is happening. I just give some news to this discussion.
Yes, if they want to make article about discussion, they should tell both sides' arguments. Maybe they thought Ion represents anti high elf side, but they should quote some anti high elf youtuber as some counterpart to Taliesin.Blizzard's response was clearly meant to put this discussion to rest. I love WoWHead, but them fueling it again with this opinion piece doesn't really feel... professional.
I like the piece, when they proved Ion is wrong in certain points. I think he should just tell he doesn't want high elves if he has to end discussion.
Last edited by matrix123mko; 2018-04-30 at 10:56 AM.
Indeed, he uses arguments that work against void elves aswell.. Their population is lower, their culture is even more similar to blood elves, because they were the blood elves just yesterday.. They kept the same racial mount, while high elves were culturally differentiating from blood elves since destruction of sunwell, also they have different mounts,
He just wants to flame and project his assumptions on us.
Last edited by mmoc09bcb5d61f; 2018-04-30 at 10:53 AM.
It's a poor article at that.
Wowhead has a duty as a platform for WoW to disseminate facts. If they wanted to do this, Perculia should have written a balanced article explaining both points of view (as I thought she was going to do from her opening).
Instead it's an opinion piece that relies on Taliesin and Evitel's own opinion piece video and the Alurna Manifest of High Elves.
It should have been labelled as an opinion piece instead of 'we're examining the reasoning and counter-arguments in more detail'.