1. #3961
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by JustaRandomReindeer View Post
    If they add HE as allied race a big chunk of the Horde population will roll Alliance. I thought people around here would be smart enough to figure out why that would be bad for everyone and the game in general. You got Void Elves. Be happy and move on.
    No, high elves are requested by few vocal fanboys, who have their echo chamber on official forums, where they upvote themselves for bigger visibility. They would certainly not threathen faction balance. Also if the blood elves are the only thing, that keeps players to play horde, then void elves should be enough to cause massive migration, because these void elves are cooler and better than bland high elves.

  2. #3962
    Here's something to think about. There was some discussion about using the Highvale settlement as a reference for a High Elf culture separate from that of the Blood Elves, and I had some thoughts about the idea.

    In the existing cross faction allied races, in the process of becoming different from the race they're based on, they give up access to that race's most iconic class. Void elves lose access to paladins, Nightborne lose access to druids. Warlocks for High Elves are right out, of course, but the Sunwell was a font of arcane energy, not fel. If they didn't get enough arcane energy, explaining a high elf mage becomes very difficult, and if the distinction is to be drawn based on their relationship with magic, would you still accept a high elf without access to mages? In that situation, I see the only reasonable class choices to be warrior, paladin, hunter, rogue, priest, and monk. They'd still need visual changes to be focused on physical rather than magical, but if you push that fantasy to the extreme, perhaps there is room for them to exist in a game that already has Blood Elves.

    I recognize that's not going to be a popular idea, but if your goal is to make them thematically different, half measures won't do. I think they would have to truly hate magic to oppose Blood Elves to the same degree that Void Elves and Nightborne do their counterparts. That said, I still think that space is crowded now that Void Elves are already in the game.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ithekro View Post
    High Elf and Blood Elf themes are probably getting farther and farther apart the longer they stay not only divided, but also hostile to each other due to the conflict between the Alliance and the Horde. They are becoming more and more two different things. This will only become more noticeable with the renewed Sunwell (the golden eyes for example) verse the older High Elves that aren't around the Sunwell anymore. The Void Elves being a third version between the two in one way, and other the opposite end of the spectrum in another way.
    I'm not necessarily against that, as long as the result is something that is both visually and thematically different from a Blood Elf. Since Blood Elves aren't going to change, that difference has to come out of the High Elf side.

    Quote Originally Posted by bloodmoth13 View Post
    pandas have the exact same culture, it makes it hard to justify having them fight eachother. high elves and blood elves have different culture. its almost the same as the distinction between nightborne and night elves, same race, different cultures. and again, its not the visuals that were the problem with pandaren, its the culture and aesthetics, they are literally the exact same between factions, high elves and blood elves have more distinction than that. So... actually i dont have to prove that pandas were a success because it has literally nothing to do with this.

    The high elves have also been a part of the alliance longer than the blood elves horde. even in vanilla wow there were high elves in the alliance. they could add ogres to the alliance now, and in 12 years it would still be fair for the horde to ask for stonemaul ogres for the horde. alliance ogres wouldnt invalidate horde ogres. Heck, lets run up a scenario:

    Blizz invent 'blood ogres', they rebranded themselves because of the death of their chieftain who loved poetry or whatever, they completely change their aesthetics and all wear unicorn skins and have a major focus on monks and poetry.

    Horde petition to get regular basic ogres on the horde, the good ole fashioned 'big brute' variety.

    Blizz then gives horde 'fire ogres' who destroy the blood ogres poetry library and got kicked out after they all suddenly became possessed by fire elements.

    Horde point out that its not what they asked for and the stonemauls are still right their, in all their regular ogre glory, they point out that stonemauls have been part of the horde since warcraft III and players have wanted them for a long time.

    blizz says "if you want ogres, then the alliance is for you".

    when its put this way its painfully obvious what the issue is and why its going to continue to be an issue till alliance high elves are a thing. i know a lot of contributors to this argument havent been able to see things from the 'pro-high elf' point of view, so i hope this 'ogre' analogy can help players see the other side better.
    Nightborne are 10000 years removed from night elves, just like high elves are 10000 years removed from night elves. They're not actually the same race.

    I enjoyed your ogre analogy for the creativity, but it has some key differences relative to the High Elf/Blood Elf situation. The Blood Elves playable in game didn't change their aesthetics when they became Blood Elves. They're just WoW's interpretation of High Elves, plus some green eyes and a new love for the color red. If you're asking for the race as it was imagined in another game, it'll just be incompatible with the way High Elves and Blood Elves exist in WoW. That specific storyline already has an in-game representation that is bound in place by playable Blood Elves. It might be frustrating, because it doesn't leave space for what you want, but it's a decision that has already been made.

    You can still get parts of what you want: a connection to the story continued through some transformation, a new race with some of the features of the race's interpretation from another game, etc. You just can't have both, because the High Elves are already playable in the form of Blood Elves (with insignificant changes according to the lore), and playable races don't change.

  3. #3963
    Pit Lord Sigxy's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Your heart!
    Posts
    2,299
    Quote Originally Posted by Arrashi View Post
    Yeah, blizzard simply loves petitions.
    And as soon as that thing reaches it's goal they are aaaall going to believe that Blizzard will FINALLY listen to them! All 500 of them!

    And then get denied. '.' And I bet if we made a petition about not allowing elves, even if it becomes much bigger than that, they will go to their discord and try find ways to ban us.

    Edit: ACTUALLY, is it possible to sign a petition with more than one Email per person? Because I BET that is what is going on if that's the case o_o
    Last edited by Sigxy; 2018-04-30 at 10:03 AM.

  4. #3964
    Quote Originally Posted by Andoras View Post
    No, high elves are requested by few vocal fanboys, who have their echo chamber on official forums, where they upvote themselves for bigger visibility. They would certainly not threathen faction balance. Also if the blood elves are the only thing, that keeps players to play horde, then void elves should be enough to cause massive migration, because these void elves are cooler and better than bland high elves.
    There are a lot of BE fans on the Horde side. If the alliance gets cooler blonde sexy elves then why would they play Horde? VEs are apparently not cooler. I think they are but after seeing all these High Elf threads maybe they were ultimately deemed to not be slutmong-able.

  5. #3965
    Quote Originally Posted by matrix123mko View Post
    There is petition for adding high elves to game: https://www.change.org/p/high-elven-..._share_initial

    And WoWhead article about high elves and Ion's response: http://www.wowhead.com/news=283929/t...an-allied-race
    339 people signed up,that is pretty impresive number just like number of high elves in game as we speak .

  6. #3966
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Zli View Post
    339 people signed up,that is pretty impresive number just like number of high elves in game as we speak .
    Still better than 10 void elves living in two tents on an asteroid.

  7. #3967
    Quote Originally Posted by JustaRandomReindeer View Post
    There are a lot of BE fans on the Horde side. If the alliance gets cooler blonde sexy elves then why would they play Horde? VEs are apparently not cooler. I think they are but after seeing all these High Elf threads maybe they were ultimately deemed to not be slutmong-able.
    if the Horde has that many rerolls to Alliance due to High Elves, than the Horde has a much more serious problem. From what we know of Allied Races, there is very little chance that more than 7% of all the Blood Elf characters will reroll as High Elves. Why? Because that would equal roughly all the combine Allied Race character currently on Live. Also one should realize that more rerolls will probably be from the Alliance to High Elf anyway. Mostly from Human and Night Elf players that couldn't roll a High Elf (because screw playing on the Horde, right lol?). Also some of the people that already rerolled or made Void Elves because they though that was as close as they were going to get to playing an Alliance High Elf. People that have Night Elves with names like XXLegololsXX would definitely reroll as a High Elf, if they bother completing the grind and unlock quests to get them.

    The grind to unlock the Allied Races is the biggest roadblock to any potential population swings. It takes effort to get an Allied Race and most people can't be bothered to rep grind for two or three months to play some random elf. So I don't image the population to shift much at all, with maybe one or two percent of the Horde Players rolling High Elves, with a similar or maybe slightly greater number of Alliance players rolling High Elves as well. That would put High Elves at I suppose Gnome levels of characters on Live. The faction balance doesn't shift hardly at all (because some Alliance players are going to switch over to Zandalari Trolls or Vulpera). And if it does shift, it will be by about 1%.

    The only other reason that the Horde might lose more of its Blood Elf population would be due to their racial not being OP anymore. And that doesn't mean they will roll Alliance....just whatever is OP at the moment. That would have nothing to do with High Elves.
    Last edited by Ithekro; 2018-04-30 at 10:34 AM.

  8. #3968
    Quote Originally Posted by Andoras View Post
    No, i want high elf, with high elven story, what he did after destruction of sunwell, how he struggled, where he lived until today. But you cant grasp that HE fans want to play high elves for their story, not because they are pretty, magnificent, unearthly,divine
    Or you just want one so you can erp in goldshire.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tennisace View Post
    In other countries like Canada the population has chosen to believe in hope, peace and tolerance. This we can see from the election of the Honourable Justin Trudeau who stood against the politics of hate and divisiveness.

  9. #3969
    The number argument has been debunked because void elvens because their are just more named high elves and high elf settlement.

    They look to mutch like blood elf argument is also debunked because again void elves. In full armor you can only tell them apart by the colour of their name blue for green for friendly. And red orange or yellow for hostile.

    They blur the line between factions. Well so do pandaren. And before you say "blizzard have stated that they aren't satisfied with how pandaren turned out".
    Well blizzard also isn't satisfied with flying in game. And we all know how that turned out. The genie is out the bottle with flying, and the Genie is out the bottle with the blurred faction via the pandaren.

    So to revue

    1: The numbers argument is moot, because not just void elves but lightforged break that criteria

    2: They look to mutch like bloodelves argument is moot. Because again void elves break that criteria so do nightborne if you want stretch it. To me it just that more effort was put in horde allied races, as opposed the alliance ones.

    3: They blur the line between factions argument is moot because Pandaren, Void elves, Nightborne break that rule. And the Pandaren part of that statement gets compounded by the flying argument.

    so all that remains is the true reason:
    They (Blizzard) just don't want too

    But they will never admit that because they don't like using finality because that limits their options. And would stop them using it as a selling point for a future expantion when subs drop again.
    Last edited by bowlink; 2018-04-30 at 10:43 AM.

  10. #3970
    All the positives are going to happen if you do what I want, and none of the negative. See these arguments? They can't be argued with. Why? Logic. What was my logic? I said it. Here's a wowhead article, high elves are happening.

  11. #3971
    Pit Lord Sigxy's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Your heart!
    Posts
    2,299
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlink View Post
    so all that remaina is the true reason:
    They (Blizzard) just don't want too
    Even if we consider this to be the 'true' reason: Sure, why not. It's their game and they should make a game they have the most fun with. If they feel High Elves as a playable race doesn't fit in with their view, they should stick to it.

  12. #3972
    Blizzard's position should have been long clear, though. Them thinking High Elves aren't distinct enough, is the main reason Void Elves were created. To meet the Alliance demand for pale elves, while giving them a gimmick different from the Blood Elves. There's 4 playable elf types now. There's not going to be another now.

    Blizzard's response was clearly meant to put this discussion to rest. I love WoWHead, but them fueling it again with this opinion piece doesn't really feel... professional.

  13. #3973
    Quote Originally Posted by Gentlepenguin View Post
    All the positives are going to happen if you do what I want, and none of the negative. See these arguments? They can't be argued with. Why? Logic. What was my logic? I said it. Here's a wowhead article, high elves are happening.
    I didn't say it is happening. I just give some news to this discussion.

    Blizzard's response was clearly meant to put this discussion to rest. I love WoWHead, but them fueling it again with this opinion piece doesn't really feel... professional.
    Yes, if they want to make article about discussion, they should tell both sides' arguments. Maybe they thought Ion represents anti high elf side, but they should quote some anti high elf youtuber as some counterpart to Taliesin.

    I like the piece, when they proved Ion is wrong in certain points. I think he should just tell he doesn't want high elves if he has to end discussion.
    Last edited by matrix123mko; 2018-04-30 at 10:56 AM.
    https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...lopment-thread
    Quote Originally Posted by Nevcairiel View Post
    If you are suggesting to take my Night Elfs Shadowmeld away, then please find some pike to run yourself through, tyvm.

  14. #3974
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigxy the Lemming View Post
    Even if we consider this to be the 'true' reason: Sure, why not. It's their game and they should make a game they have the most fun with. If they feel High Elves as a playable race doesn't fit in with their view, they should stick to it.
    If they want to stick to that view fine. But then don't use bullshit reasons that you can poke holes in like damp toilet paper. Own up to is and don't lie about is

  15. #3975
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlink View Post
    If they want to stick to that view fine. But then don't use bullshit reasons that you can poke holes in like damp toilet paper. Own up to is and don't lie about is
    Indeed, he uses arguments that work against void elves aswell.. Their population is lower, their culture is even more similar to blood elves, because they were the blood elves just yesterday.. They kept the same racial mount, while high elves were culturally differentiating from blood elves since destruction of sunwell, also they have different mounts,

    Quote Originally Posted by matrix123mko View Post
    I didn't say it is happening. I just give some news to this discussion.
    He just wants to flame and project his assumptions on us.
    Last edited by mmoc09bcb5d61f; 2018-04-30 at 10:53 AM.

  16. #3976
    Legendary! Obelisk Kai's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    The north of Ireland
    Posts
    6,081
    Quote Originally Posted by Caerule View Post
    Blizzard's position should have been long clear, though. Them thinking High Elves aren't distinct enough, is the main reason Void Elves were created. To meet the Alliance demand for pale elves, while giving them a gimmick different from the Blood Elves. There's 4 playable elf types now. There's not going to be another now.

    Blizzard's response was clearly meant to put this discussion to rest. I love WoWHead, but them fueling it again with this opinion piece doesn't really feel... professional.
    It's a poor article at that.

    Wowhead has a duty as a platform for WoW to disseminate facts. If they wanted to do this, Perculia should have written a balanced article explaining both points of view (as I thought she was going to do from her opening).

    Instead it's an opinion piece that relies on Taliesin and Evitel's own opinion piece video and the Alurna Manifest of High Elves.

    It should have been labelled as an opinion piece instead of 'we're examining the reasoning and counter-arguments in more detail'.

  17. #3977
    Quote Originally Posted by Caerule View Post
    Blizzard's position should have been long clear, though. Them thinking High Elves aren't distinct enough, is the main reason Void Elves were created. To meet the Alliance demand for pale elves, while giving them a gimmick different from the Blood Elves. There's 4 playable elf types now. There's not going to be another now.

    Blizzard's response was clearly meant to put this discussion to rest. I love WoWHead, but them fueling it again with this opinion piece doesn't really feel... professional.
    I have known for a long time that perculia had some Alliance bias, but I was still surprised by that article. She didn't even mention the blurred lines between factions, even though she claimed to be explaining "the reasons and counter arguments."

  18. #3978
    Legendary! Obelisk Kai's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    The north of Ireland
    Posts
    6,081
    Quote Originally Posted by protip View Post
    I have known for a long time that perculia had some Alliance bias, but I was still surprised by that article. She didn't even mention the blurred lines between factions, even though she claimed to be explaining "the reasons and counter arguments."
    Alliance bias is fine. Presenting it as an opinion piece would have been fine.

    Presenting it as an examination of the controversy and then relying on Taliesin's flawed video and Alurna's biased (by it's nature) manifesto is the equivalent of presenting a discussion between Evolution and Creationism and then relying on the bible as the sole source of information.

    As you said she, like Taliesin, never mentioned the critical factors that led to High Elves being ruled out.

    That they blur the faction lines.
    That they are thematically identical to a core Horde race.
    That they would damage the position and lore of Void Elves.
    Last edited by Obelisk Kai; 2018-04-30 at 10:59 AM.

  19. #3979
    As you said she, like Taliesin, never mentioned the critical factors that led to High Elves being ruled out.

    That they blur the faction lines.
    What's wrong with this? Both tauren and night elves are druidic, they both use feathers on their armors, they both are very hippie. Worgen and undead - cursed humans, done wrong things against their will, their leaders live out of vengeance. Goblins and gnomes - tinkers, lost their kingdoms, short. Faction lines are already blurred. Remember discussion why did trolls and tauren agree to burn Teldrassill? So don't tell me that high elves are too dangerous to add.
    https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...lopment-thread
    Quote Originally Posted by Nevcairiel View Post
    If you are suggesting to take my Night Elfs Shadowmeld away, then please find some pike to run yourself through, tyvm.

  20. #3980
    Pit Lord Sigxy's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Your heart!
    Posts
    2,299
    Normally I never really reading up on 'news' on WowHead as I prefer doing so on MMO-Champion. It happened sometimes lately to get more information on allied races that they have DATAMINED things, but rarely. After seeing that pro-High Elf thing and just showing "How they can work" and not showing things that might also counter the idea, I feel like I haven't missed out on much. Doesn't help when they blamed the fact on that it was just the opinions on that video or whatever, not their own - they REALLY should've made that far more clear. x_x

    Should've just stuck to being a Database to look up items in my opinion.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •