Don't agree that it separates them personally, but if the context in what we see Farstriders be less relevant is not only plot relevance, but a reflection of their place on BE society, I understand the argument can be made that Playable High Elves could have focused on ranger themes.
Every wow race has organizations for all their classes, but they mostly focus on a couple as cornerstones of their culture, and as relevant Rangers were for elves in general, they have never really been much more than background info.
But let's not frame this as a Pro-High Elf thing. We aren't getting High Elves, so this is personally for me about being disappointed that ranger themes have little relevance in current lore. My main used to be a "Blood Elf Ranger" but it just wasnt interesting to have so little "fantasy" about them , not like my Belf paladin has, ya feel?
Indeed, I was just pointing out under which parameters the pandaren precedent feels justifiable, which is about mechanics.It's not really about mechanics though, which is why I don't understand people making that argument. It's about the themes, which in the case of Pandaren justify their neutrality. The fact that the only exception to that issue has a clear reason for being such an exception means that you can't logically apply the same rules to other new races unless their themes also justify neutrality, even if it had been considered successful.
Asides that, I personally believe that political ideology is more interesting than racial classification. I find the HE/BE divide even more justifiable than the pandaren one, but that indeed would mean shifting the paradigm that "X race belongs on Y faction" Which is how WoW is constructed. I can disagree with that paradigm, sure, but I am not making decisions about the game. But yeah, personally, I don't like Pandaren because of their neutrality, I would have liked a lot more if they had far better reasons for picking a side -like HE and BE do-
Personally, I'd love playable Eredar/Sargerei, whichever faction -but Horde would be more likely- I'm all about options when it comes to AR as long there's a good story behind it. VE feel like the opposite of that, they just took part of a faction and moved it into the other without the much richer context HE had.
Which as an aside to the aside, keeps me wondering "Why weren't VE made out of the Silver Covenant HE??"
- - - Updated - - -
That's the wrong question.
"Why waste narrative real state on non-playable races when that place COULD have been filled with playable races" That's the point. This is BLATANTLY obvious when it comes to High Elves, no other "Non-playable" race has that level of involvement with their faction, none. THAT'S the issue here. The SC has been given a disproportional amount of relevance as a High Elf organization.
Why wasn't the Silver Covenant made of Humans, High Elves and Gnomes? We could still have kept Vereesa as the leader, sure, but by simply framing it as a Dalarani resistance to the horde/blood elves instead of only a High Elf one they could have avoided given them relevance to the perennially non playable High Elves.
- - - Updated - - -
I hope you are right. It won't answer why Blizz just didn't make the VE out of High Elves tho. Still, that would finally be a narrative solution, which is what I want.