Originally Posted by
Fyersing
They're certainly more unique, biologically, than people often give them credit for.
It's fairly common to see things like, "Void Elves are just Blood Elves who bit off more Void than they could chew, and it corrupted their bodies". It isn't a strictly inaccurate generalized statement, but I fail to understand the purpose (in the context of someone using it to justify playable High Elves) -- especially if the intent it to suggest that taking [Race #1], and subjecting some of them to some magical calamity in order to provide the narrative foundation for [Race #2], is somehow a terrible design philosophy.
If it's "terrible narrative" when Blood Elves get dipped in Void, why isn't it "terrible narrative" for Dark Iron Dwarves, or Worgen, or Lightforged Draenei, or Nightborne, or even Mag'har Orcs (who would be a reversal of a calamitous event, in this case)?
Personally, I can't find a single issue with Void Elves as a standalone group. That isn't really what the question in these last few hundred pages has been about, though, is it? Instead, the question being asked is generally, "are Void Elves close enough to High Elves that they will be widely considered to be an acceptable stand-in for the latter?"
I suspect the answer, for the time being, is "no".