
Originally Posted by
Obelisk Kai
I placed emphasis on your quote on your use of the word 'transform', which is the critical point. Blood Elves transformed by the void. As Void Elves, they are just about enough not to damage Blood Elves.
As for your contention that Void Elves did more damage to the Blood Elves, absolute nonsense...although I do thank you for the implicit admission on your part that an Alliance High Elf race WOULD do damage to the Blood Elves. Makes a change from pro High Elfers arrogantly disregarding what those of us opposed say and falsely claiming 'what we want wouldn't hurt anyone!'.
If Void Elves do any damage now, it is to themselves and themselves alone because as you helpfully pointed, they aren't Blood/High Elves anymore. They were
I like Draenei too but faction choice has consequences.
Yeah. Pull the other one. These races weren't designed in a vacuum and for them to have been unaware of the demand for Alliance High Elves means that they weren't reading the forums and all your activity in the years prior to the unveiling of the Allied race system wasn't registering. As you've been at this topic as long as I have, I find that idea more than a little funny. Whilst a humorous thought, it isn't true. They were well aware of the demand. They have always been aware of the demand.
We KNOW Alliance High Elves were considered for two reasons. Firstly, in the video I linked to you, Ion specifically mentioned them as a candidate for the sub-race system they were thinking about that ultimately became the Allied race system. Secondly, the question from last year's April Q and A was phrased precisely as follows
"When deciding on Allied Race, why did you choose Void Elves when High Elves seemed much more of an organic (and popular) choice"?
Leading phrasing aside, the question's context invited a response predicated on 'why did you choose Void Elves over High Elves' and Ion obliged, spelling out the many reasons Alliance High Elves just don't work. Reasons he had given a few months previously when asked at Blizzcon 2017.
If we are to believe your version of events, the sole reason Void Elves were added was because they were an attempt to create something new and cool. The problem with your approach of course is that you treat these as mutually exclusive, that they were something new and cool or that they were a replacement for the Alliance High Elves.
It was both. Once they realised they couldn't add High Elves, due to them being playable as a Horde race, they set out to create a new and cool variant as a compromise.
Anyone who seriously believes Void Elves were an idea conceived with zero reference to the desire for Alliance High Elves is practising denial of the blatantly obvious.
Maybe it's because you cannot bear to face that truth that for a period of time, the developers actively considered your request for Alliance High Elves, could have been a few minutes, a few hours, a few days. But for a period of time it was a live possibility. And then in the end, someone said 'no' and that was that.
High Elf requests exploded? Please contain yourself. The discord has a few hundred members. The petition has a few hundred signatories. And the only reason the threads on the official forums remain active is because, as here, the same usual suspects keep the circular debate going. Yours is not a mass movement. Yours is a very loud one. So yes, a loud minority. As for the forum blues, community management should not be confused with developer opinion.
Since when is a compromise intended to satisfy everyone? This is an MMO with a few million players, you cannot satisfy them all and no decision Blizzard has ever made has ever satisfied everyone. And since when does the pro High Elf community get a veto? Void Elves weren't what you wanted, that's tough, but they are also the most popular Allied race and a success when compared to all the other options. But the hardcore High Elf community weren't happy at not getting exactly High Elves? I am sure they were just STUNNED to learn that was the reaction.
Of course they heard your request. Stop grasping this infantile fantasy that they somehow missed it. If you don't want to accept Void Elves as the compromise they intended in lieu of actual High Elves, then the answer is 'No'. Stated loudly and clearly through action and word.
And yes, the "for now" line. The sad hope he left you with because the man is a lawyer and knows that they need a get out clause if at some point WAAAAY down the line someone (not him) changes their mind. Last thing they want is to hand someone a rhetorical hammer 'You said never to X...but you also said never to High Elves...so we want X!'.
Also If he was backing down from a controversy he made a damn poor show of it. I mean after six months of arguments on the forums since what he said at Blizzcon 2017, he then 'backs away from the controversy' by repeating himself except this time with added snark.
Ya. Stellar logic there.
Why bother. Issue is sorted. Void Elves are in the Alliance, most popular Allied race and is successful. And there are plenty of other issues facing the game right now that need developer attention rather than pandering to the neurosis of a small group who after fifteen years are seemingly incapable of taking the hint.
Yeah, thing is, that's a political choice. The sole difference between the two groups. The sole difference I have acknowledged. The sole difference you reached for here.
So again, you agree with me.