Then I'll go ahead and say it: the developers are wrong.
Except no, it would not go to the blood elves. Especially like if an explanation is given, like blue hair only happen if a high elf is not affected by the fel at all, which would prevent all blood elves from having blue hair.That individual is not a different race from Blood Elves, therefore blue hair for Blood Elves please. Leaving that aside, hair colour is not enough. Eye colour is not enough.
"Void elf"-ification can be replicated. Your argument is invalid.Both can be replicated. Differentiation is accomplished by a some sort of profound difference that cannot be replicated.
The analogy doesn't fail, because on both situations we have the "owners" saying something that does not match what our eyes see."The analogy fails because it's predicated on a flawed basis, that the developers are wrong and you are right.
If the developers made Sylvanas become a blood-thirsty ruler, intentionally killing so many Horde members that would make even Garrosh blush, start attacking and torturing children in heinous experiments, killed Thrall to demoralize the rebels, and then killed Aggra and her children just because "why not", and made a throne for herself in Orgrimmar using the bones of the other leaders of the Horde she killed... but the developers said Sylvanas was a moral, noble leader... would you believe them? Because your words so far heavily imply they do.
No, I'm a customer coming into an unclean restaurant, and complaining it's unclean.You are not right. You are a customer coming into an immaculate restaurant and insisting it's dirty despite all evidence to the contrary.
I don't care what you believe, simple as that. My answer, and what I believe, are not predicated on yours. But, in short, yes, I would.This is of course the other half of the issue, the company the Blood Elves keep. Had the Blood Elves stayed with the Alliance, and the Silver Covenant High Elves still stayed separate and glowered at them for being mana junkies, do you honestly expect me to believe you'd be agitating for those pure, uncorrupted Silver Covenant High Elves?
No, I don't, and I would appreciate if you stopped repeating that falsehood.You want to have a Horde race on the faction you prefer.
You're just proving my point, here. They're no longer high elves. They're blood elves now.Character creator makes sure to mention that Blood Elves used to call themselves High Elves.
Starts your Blood Elf off in Quel'thalas.
Your Blood Elf visits the high elf capital of Silvermoon city.
Your Blood Elf can undertake a heritage armor questline showing you 'the last act of the high elves', right before they redefined themselves as Blood Elves.
No, they don't. They define only what a blood elf is. High elves still exist, and so they define what a high elf is, not those who rejected the name. You would have a point if no high elves were left alive in the world and they were just a memory.Blood Elves constitute such an overwhelming majority of the race that they ARE defining what a high elf is.
Is it wrong because the silhouettes have been given to the opposite faction, which is the crux of the issue. Skin color is meaningless in that regard. Before nightborne and void elves, if I saw a thalassian elf silhouette around, I'd immediately recognize it as a blood elf, just by batting an eye. I'd instantly recognize a tauren, an orc, a night elf, a human, a troll, etc... and would instantly know which faction they belong to. Now, with nightborne and void elves... the moment I see one of them, I will not know if it's a nightborne or a night elf, or a blood elf or void elf. At the very least, not until I mouse over or target them, and see the color of their outline or name. Almost no one will.How is it wrong?
You speak of rolling your eyes, yet mine are threatening to roll off their sockets at the dishonesty you're presenting, here. Because you're heavily implying I'm after high elves because of their silhouette. I'm not. And I've told you that numerous times, already. I simply use this argument to counter this silly notion that the "faction lines" are still preserved.Your point is that because Nightborne and Void Elves use the same basic models as Night Elves and Blood/High Elves respectively, that this means the faction boundaries have been broken. And as a result, they shouldn't resist giving the Alliance High Elves on the grounds of faction diversity.
You are probably the only person pushing this argument with any kind of consistency. It's not hard to understand why your fellow pro High Elfers are reluctant to follow this line of attack. Because IF you are in fact right, and Void Elves violate the faction boundary by being too similar to Blood Elves, then you have already won. The Alliance has it's High Elves and this entire thread is redundant.
Yeah. Funny how this post of mine proves you wrong. My contention is with this claim that says "high elves look too much like a blood elf to be viable", and that's why I make this point about silhouettes.Void Elves to you aren't good enough because they aren't the high elves you wanted. Their lore is too different.
Blood Elves aren't good enough because they are a part of the Horde. Their lore is wrong.
Only Alliance High Elves matter, the right shade of Elf on the right faction.
Yet you, who argues lore is important, are willing to say that lore plays no part in faction diversity. That it's all about the model in fact. That YOU are the only who cares about the story and the background.
- - - Updated - - -
But not all high elves are blood elves.
False. No option in the Alliance banner in the character creation screen.High Elves are playable.

Recent Blue Posts
Recent Forum Posts
Midnight Epic Edition + Beta Access Giveaway
MMO-Champion


Reply With Quote






