Just dropping by, and showing my support for High Elves for the Alliance.
Just dropping by, and showing my support for High Elves for the Alliance.
Isn't that exactly what you're doing? The irony in your statement is what's truly funny. You all literally ignore Blizzard's statements. You attempt to poke little fan-fic holes in their words and their implementation in a desperate attempt to seem as if you're right when the game very, very clearly shows you're wrong.
It's not really complicated to look at the game, see there are no playable High Elves, and conclude that Blizzard must not think they're worth the effort or that the story they want to portray doesn't leave room for them. Especially since you guys have been requesting them since dirt was invented. They've had 15 years or more to "agree" with you, and they haven't yet. Looks like their stance aligns with Obelisk's and mine. And let's not even get into the fact they've said High Elves are playable as Blood Elves on the Horde side.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
Last edited by Black Goat; 2019-09-27 at 03:43 PM.
i think he meant alliance high elves dont really have a role to play in the alliance story besides flavor NPCs like being dalaran portal keepers. while alleria and the void elves are firmly with the alliance and fighting the horde. making the portal keepers playable takes away from void elves being developed and just copies the blood elf fantasy into the alliance.
Except, "that type of High Elf" that the players who request High Elves isn't playable. Something even Aucald understands after getting clarification. Also, the entire AR system wouldn't exist if the goal of race options wasn't people wanting to play "that type of X". The very foundation of the AR as a whole is that "hey now if you want to place as this type of dwarf vs that type of dwarf you can."
The comment made by Ion on that day was a Red Herring, as he tried to justify "hey this 'race' is playable - go play them" when the entire purpose of Allied Races isn't completely new races but variations of existing ones. Hence every bit of AR released so far being a variant off of what already exists.
As far as "Allied Races being so rare they wouldn't spend time doing High Elves", I've brought up that they've acknowledged Wildhammer Dwarves as a valid request and those are simply Bronzebeard looking Dwarves with tattoos slapped on them. If these guys are valid, so are High Elves. Not to mention that you seem to keep ignoring that Afrasiabi, post Ion- "horde is waiting for you" QA, said "don't give up hope" and that was specifically a shoutout to High Elf requesters despite the question involving Void Elves, the meat of it was surrounding the High Elf request.
Besides, he's not talking to Void Elf fans when he says that as I recall Void Elf fans are extremely happy to have Void Elves the way they are.
Allied Races might become more rare, but it isn't a system Blizzard stated that replaces getting new races (think of Goblin/Worgen/Pandaren/Blood Elves/Draenei) which you seem to imply a lot. Can we see new races utilized through the Allied Race system? Sure, Vulpera for instance seem likely, but the basis of all AR is from existing races - Zandalari are a modified Night Elf skeleton, just like Nightborne for instance.
They're the most protested because they're the most popular. It just follows by nature. PewDiePie for instance has 100m subscribers now, how many haters do you think he has in comparison to someone who has 1m subscribers by comparison?
Also it was a Forum Ticket answerer, not a CM that said that.
As you note down below you don't spend time on the official forums, so I'll let you glean some info: Go into the US megathreads of the various Allied Races. ALL of them will have anywhere from 1-X posts dissenting the inclusion of that race as an AR and the more active threads will have more posts dissenting in comparison to the lesser active ones.
Pointing out that the High Elf request has the most dissenters isn't an argument against their inclusion, because every AR has dissenters. The High Elf request has both the most for and the most against because it is the most popular. Just like my PewDiePie example. You will find the MOST haters for him than any other YT creator by nature of him being the most popular.
A WoW example would be Sylvanas for instance. She's famous, so she has the most fans and also the most haters of the playerbase that enjoys Horde leaders. In comparison, Lor'themar who is less popular by definition has less haters but also less fans.
You're trying to make some argument which doesn't make sense. If something is popular it's going to have fans and haters, the more popular it is the more fans AND haters it will have.
How come it "feels to be the last opportunity", just because Allied Races will become more rare? If you're going to repeat what I already replied to above, then just re-read the above. Allied Races becoming rare doesn't mean High Elf AR opportunity won't happen, especially if Wildhammer are still valid. AR are not the vehicle taking place of new races.
Just like how in BFA Blizzard stated they're taking a break from Class sets, yet everyone seems to think Blizzard said "we're not doing Class sets anymore" and you see posts mention "I hOpE tHeY bRiNg ClAsS sEtS bAcK!!$!#" when it's like no-shit, they never stated such a thing in the first place.
Same thing with AR, Blizzard hasn't stated it's the only way they're going to bring new races now.
I don't think boundaries will be relaxed either, but the rest of this part not commenting on because I don't agree Void Elves are a compromise for High Elves. Again, post-Ion - Afrasiabi's comment encourages continuation of this very request.
They will read this I'm sure, so just bolding it for them lol. Also, they specifically referred to the Silver Covenant, but as I said - SC is synonymous with High Elves at this point. If they were referring to High Elves then they'd be immediately wrong as we see High Elf presence in BfA since 8.0.
Here's the thing. Someone can make an argument that Vereesa acts as a proxy for High Elves. Just as how people get all jumpy and excited over Dark Rangers happening because of Sylvanas's presence and how people act like Alleria's story = Void Elf story. Whether they're correct or incorrect on doing so is another story, but people do this all the time not just with Vereesa. Nor even the Elven sisters.
Some argued with Rexxar getting a new appearance to mean Ogres/Mok'nathal would join the Horde as an AR, yet no presence of them to be found. It's not uncommon at all that people do this. If they're right in doing so is another conversation entirely.
Although I have no further inclination to go deeper into that line of conversation.
Having loads of fun, am honestly so glad for Classic to exist. Am getting to experience the beginning of the game and it feels good, progress is slow and steady and satisfying. I actually do not see myself buying new expansions for WoW unless they go on sale or have a feature I truly love (like check this I just saw Wish for potential new Worgen druid forms. If they come out with customization like that, I would have reasons to play more current WoW - because gearing in current doesn't feel as great as gearing in Classic. I'm content to finish up whatever content comes in BfA and then grind out all the collectables that exist and going back to Classic and completing what I want to on there.
Condolences for your guild choosing Shazzrah, that literally is the biggest content creator/streamer server so unless they had plans to play with those people they should've chose another server from the get-go. Like on the US side, all the streamers announced they'd be going to Faerlina and so recommended Herod for those not wanting to play with streamers.
Also I hear queues in EU are worse than on US, so that probably had a factor as well for queues lasting longer than US side.
It's definitely gotten more fun as I met guildies from retail who decided to play on the same server I was on. My original plan was going solo on a non-streamer server, though now if the guild falls apart (through boredom or something ) or something I will re-roll to Faerlina on US as a particular streamer is doing great things with creating a strong community presence/guild. That's where I'll go if I find myself playing solo!
Last edited by FlubberPuddy; 2019-09-27 at 04:06 PM.
What he said is crystal clear.
And he is wrong.
They are part of the Alliance, as much as Dark Iron Dwarves are.
The only difference is that they are not playable.
- - - Updated - - -
Your comment was pretty hilarious, I must admit.
However. You are defending someone who's only intent is to create a bad environment through messages that only have inflammatory goals behind them.
If you feel that I said something out of place, I would strongly suggest that you should reconsider your stance, since it's very wrong.
Except we're not talking about objective matters, like how big the continent of Kalimdor is, or how all the different types of magic interact with one-another. We're talking about subjective matters, and, on that subject, Blizzard's "authority" is very much questionable. The "blurring of faction lines" is highly subjective. The "low population" argument is highly subjective. Even the "they look alike" is also subjective.
An oversight is still a mistake. It means you were wrong. And yes, the Red Shirt Guy example is a viable parallel, because it shows that what Blizzard says is not 100% perfect and void of errors, and "what they say, goes" regarding their creative work.The Red shirt guy example never has been the parallel you think it is. The question posed by the Red Shirt guy was incredibly niche and related to the purely lore issue of two relatively obscure Dwarven characters. Does this mean a creator was wrong about their work of fiction? No, because it wasn't being wrong, it was an oversight and when it was pointed out to them it was corrected. Being wrong would have meant doubling down on their NPC placement and ignoring the lore that said it was incorrect.
"Sound interpretation" is, again, just your opinion. Because there are lot of controversy regarding said "sound interpretation". Even former Blizzard employees voiced their disagreement regarding said "sound interpretation".The parallel fails because their stance on Blood Elves is not an error. It is actually a sound interpretation of the facts on a matter that is not purely lore, but heavily involves gameplay factors as well. And, in contrast to red shirt's guy triumphant moment when he did make Blizzard realise they had overlooked something, when the pro High Elf case was put to the developers you got a robust defense of the faction divide and a statements of Blizzard's interpretation of the facts, which has been our last word on the matter.
But everyone's opinions do have equal value, since we're talking about subjective matters.Blizzard's opinions and statements are indeed not above reproach or criticism, it is your right to make those critiques and argue for a change. But what you cannot do is insist that your opinion has equal value, or even superior value, to their own. Stating Blizzard is wrong will get you nowhere. Stating 'this is why Blizzard should change their minds' might lead to progress, but it also implies an acceptance of the facts they have put forth on this topic.
- - - Updated - - -
Just a 'FYI', "'X feature' will never be in the game" are usually DOA arguments. Because your statement is just as true and false as saying "'X feature' will be in the game".
Here's another statement from Blizzard: "You think you do, but you don't.""Blood Elves are basically High Elves. Slightly different eye color and backstory, but if you want to be a light skinned elf, that is basically a Blood Elf. Giving that to the Alliance would blur the line between factions.
There aren't a ton of High Elves out there in WoW.
"If you are Alliance any want to be an elf, the Horde is there for you."
Developer Q&A with Ion Hazzikostas 24/08/2018
How did that turn out?
Don't project, please. And yes, we can, and we are.The delusion is with you sir. You can't argue against Ion on this one.
"Torturing someone is not an evil thing to do if it is done for good reasons" by Varodoc
"You sit in OG/SW waiting on a Mythic+ queue" by Altmer <- Oh, the pearls in this forum...
"They sort of did this Dragonriding, which ushered in the Dracthyr race." by Teriz <- the BS some people reach for their narratives...
I'm... wrong? You told someone to "learn their place" in a discussion about High Elves, which has so many implications regarding how you view yourself. I think you're taking your obsession for this too far. I will begin reporting your posts that insult and degrade other people in the furtherance of your unpopular High Elf opinion, and I hope others do, too. I don't report posts or people hardly, but your attitude and choice of words disgusts me to the point where I'll make an exception for you.
You're wrong for being so nasty to people who are only here to discuss the pros and cons of High Elves. You should strongly reconsider how you talk to people.
Last edited by Black Goat; 2019-09-27 at 05:03 PM.
Except you fail to understand that the message I responded to goes beyond a 'discussion about High Elves', since it was crafted to do anything but -discuss-.
Reconsider your stance, since it's very, very wrong.
Edit: In fact, I see you responded to another poster saying that the request is based on fan-fic.
That is not only ignorant but heavily wrong.
You have not taken any time to read what others said or even to try to understand anything that goes beyond what you personally want.
Last edited by Aldo Hawk; 2019-09-27 at 05:06 PM.
I don't need to reconsider anything. You're nothing more than a bully with an unpopular opinion who would prefer to tell people their wrong, call them stupid, and other derogatory phrases like "learn your place" so you can feel special about supporting a fictional video game race. I'm not "failing" to understand anything. A brief search of your post history helps me understand exactly what I'm talking to -- a person that wants to put people down instead of raise them up.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, I have. You're still wrong. High Elves are playable, just not on the Alliance faction. It's not a complex issue. People can type all the paragraphs they want to try and dilute the facts. Yet only one fact remains: High Elves, by and large, converted to Blood Elves and joined the Horde. End of story. That's not an opinion. That's not debatable. That's a demonstrable fact both in game and in lore.
Last edited by Black Goat; 2019-09-27 at 05:15 PM.
These are your feelings talking.
And I don't have to 'raise up' anybody when the intention is clearly to come here and spout some derogatory and incendiary comment with the purpose of creating a bad environment.
Just look at it and write with a straight face that it was not the intent: https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...1#post51636917
In fact, you are telling me to shy away instead of answering to -actual- 'bullies'.
High elves are not playable.
I play a Blood elf, it is my main, I played the majority of the time I have played WoW through the eyes of a Blood elf.
Blood elves are not the High elves that are being asked for.
High elves are not Blood elves. High elves are not Void elves.
You just want to repeat that Blood elves and Void elves are High elves because that is all that you have at the end. However, that fact does not conflict with the other fact that High elves are not Blood elves or Void elves. It only conflicts because individuals like you push for it as if it meant the other way is not correct. Which is a -wrong- stance and a -wrong- argument to make.
What you call a 'demonstrable fact' does nothing more than jump over the blatantly obvious existence of the High elves that never returned to Quel'thalas, despise the Horde and stayed with the Alliance. It is a falsehood pushed only by your personal desire for the request to fade off and stop being mentioned again.
Last edited by Aldo Hawk; 2019-09-27 at 05:37 PM.
I'm dropping by to say I hope Blizz listens to those of us who disagree with adding playable high elves to the Alliance.
If anything the Alliance players should be happy they have Void Elves.
Void Elves being so popular makes me think that blizz is happy with their addition to the Alliance.
Last edited by Starla; 2019-09-27 at 06:06 PM.
I'd say if the speculation about faction lines blurring is true, and I can walk around Silvermoon and Stormwind without getting attacked or having to set foot in Orgrimmar ever again, wear Alliance themed gear and tabards, team up and interact with Alliance races as a Blood Elf, then I'd say that's a good compromise in my eyes. It'd at least save me from levelling up a fresh character or race changing.
Add like a blue eye colour option to Blood Elf as a bonus.
Last edited by sammygm; 2019-09-27 at 09:46 PM.
i have read the thread. and i find kai the most convincing and honest. most pros want the blood elf fantasy copy pasted to the alliance. pretty much every change proposed has been a blood elf combing their hair different and smearing on war paint. hairstyle is not distinct enough. a political opinion isnt either. you could scrap the portal keeper and the island expedition team memebr in boralus and 99% of the alliance wouldnt notice or care. thats how much of a role they play in the alliance story
how? dark iron dwarves appear in the war campaign and for assaults. you know who doesnt? these elusive, almost mythic, alliance high elves. not a single one appears in the war campaign
Last edited by bdlovelace; 2019-09-27 at 11:40 PM.
I would have to respectfully disagree with you here Aldo. The blood elf people are high elves, they simply renamed themselves. It is through them that you experience the high elf storyline. Their crushing defeat at the hands of Arthas and their rebirth as blood elves. To suggest they are not playable is a disingenuous argument.
High elves are Blood elves. The elves calling themselves high elves are those who refused to follow the rest of their people with the name change. At a fundamental level, they are still the same race.
On the other hand, void elves are blood elves who are transformed. Those blood elves were also around during the time of Arthas and also changed their names from being high elves. It is more accurate to state high elves and blood elves are the same people, but void elves are those elves transformed by void magic,
This is only partially true here. Some high elves are against the Horde, such as Alleria and Vereesa. Some are not against them and are neutral and sometimes friendly towards the Horde. To suggest the high elves hate the horde is not making an honest argument.
Now, to address another argument.
It is my understanding those wanting them playable are offering to change them. I have several issues with the notion for the following reason.
First, the appearance of high elves and blood elves is the same because they are the same people, with the same origins. Their lore has established their appearance ever since the Warcraft RTS games. Changing them would be a pure violation of the original lore, a lore, which by those of the pro side, state they wish to protect. On the other hand, changing it in such a manner means the lore no longer matters.
Second, even if we ignore the first, if the reason you like high elves is because of the original lore, then does it not contradict your stance to change them? Why would you change what you originally admired? It becomes more of a matter of title, then, rather than it being about the actual race and lore itself. Perhaps I am wrong, but it just seems too...superficial? Struggling to find the right word.
Last edited by Broflake; 2019-09-27 at 11:51 PM.
I really think sooner or later they will add them to the game. Maybe with the factions being at peace, they can rebuild Silvermoon together and let the High Elves return.