Implying that you are the one being logical when all you do is declaring something "factually incorrect" that neither you or I can know for a fact is laughable.
You provided 0 arguments for your position, while declaring anyone holding another position "incredibly stupid". This leads me to suspect that any argument you would have would be purely subjective. My argument on the other hand was objective, I don't even play Alliance so I would never play High Elf anyway.
It is a fact that some people want to be able to select "High Elf" as a race and play as that, even though the character on the screen would be visually indistinct from what they could already play as a "Void Elf". Given that all the art assets and animations already exists, this very limited investment by Blizzard could tilt a customer to decide to stick around for a few more months or return to the game, even if only for a few months before the novelty wears off, because this is something they have really wanted for a as long as the game has existed.
Neither you or I can know for a fact how many such customers exists, or how many such customers need to exist in order for this very limited investment by Blizzard to pay off. Blizzard can calculate the second number, but not even they can know the first number. Reasonably both numbers would be low, so it wouldn't take many such customers existing within the target demographic of tens of millions of people for this to be profitable. Between adding "High Elf" as a race or adding some random leveling quest, likely of similar size as an investment, which do I think would make them more money? The "High Elf" race option hands down.
https://www.youtube.com/@DoffenGG
Mostly World of Warcraft stuff
Playing victim? Hardly. I'll simply point out your actions for what they are. The moment they announced the skin tones you and yours have been feeling free to accuse others of being salty. If you don't like it, maybe drop the antagonism?
Let alone, it isn't hypocritical.
If the looks are going to be shared, then it is better to make sure both sides get equal treatment to ensure no one can complain. Not sure why you are unhappy about it.
Yes...they have only one theme in their appearance.
Void elves have two.
Which means you can play the "I am a void elf" theme look, and then you can choose to go with the "I am a blood/high elf" theme look.
That is two themes.
Is this a joke? Are you honestly trying to use classes as a form of theme? Classes which are shared by multiple race? That isn't a functional argument in itself becaus the themes of a race are largely visual and in lore.
Void elves have access to blood elf lore AND their visual appearance.
You can drop the indignation, you're demanding void elves get more exclusive appearance option when they already have one. Like...dude...
The void elves didnt lose their entire appearance to another faction.
This is just you willfully being ignorant.
The aesthetics are a part of the theme for a race.
Which is precisely why void elves existed instead of high elves per the devs. Considering how many helfers are now going "oh yeah this is great" it would be a lie to suggest this doesnt give them the theme that they are saying it gives them.
You mean...the one that originates with them and should also be present on them?
The one they dont use because the basic architecture of the game doesnt provide tattoos for those early races unless they werebaked in?
I am not sure why you believe that it isnt being used when its simply a gameplay design limitation that only recently was overcome.
I am not denying void elves get somethng, but I am going to point out the hypocrisy on your part to say they should get it and not blood elves.
You complain other peole were denying you high elves, but now you want to deny what should be a part of a core race?
Well that's fine if that is what you personally believe, but you can drop the attitude when others say they dont agree and want parity accordingly.
- - - Updated - - -
Not really. They were left in despite the reports for ToT, and supported with Lanesh and several other named NPC's with blue eyes.
Its why I reject the concept that blue eyes was exclusive to HE, let alone a theme.
Considering how quickly Ion walked back his statement and many other things, its clear they're trying to get away from colors being exlcusive now.
Well, let's wait and see what happens.
I always wanted them to expand the story so that high elves were joining the void elves, and then have heavier emphasis on the void theme. That to me would have been good. Now though, I am annoyed because the void elf theme is going to be forgotten
While I don't think Blood Elf players would appreciate recolors of their heritage doled out to the Alliance, nor would I support such a thing, I do like the idea of different colored variants of heritage armor for all races. Of course every race should actually have a heritage armor set before we get into making color variants available imo.
They have made them for some, so not sure why they don't make them available.
Like Nightborne red color:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpARTSv82L4
Lightforged also have different colors made.
https://www.youtube.com/@DoffenGG
Mostly World of Warcraft stuff
It's a shame the Silvermoon warfront was never put into the game. That could have been an amazing battle between the Ren'dorei/Quel'dorei faction led by Alleria and the Sin'dorei led by Lor'themar Theron.
Gonna just be honest here, if void elves got the Kael'thas orb look and blood elves didn't, I'd be super jealous.
On the heritage armor topic, though, doesn't the Mag'har set change based on your skin tone or something? Am I just imagining that?
Love far left the most, especially with that void decayed left side/jaw!
- - - Updated - - -
I think you literally just unlock the various tints and they can be tmogged. Unsure though because I've got Mag'har unlocked but not their heritage armors.