Lord of the Rings TV Series Purchased by Amazon

[Triceron]

Yes, they're iconic for all the wrong reasons.

Legolas literally has no character development in the movies, and isn't really interesting once you really break down him down. It's not like he's well known for being well acted or having character depth. He's most well known for being a charming, badass pretty boy that is practically a Gary Stu, and I don't know if that's any better, really. I mean, Legolas is also iconic in the movies, and I don't know what reasons there would be that I could point to say 'this is the right way'.

Cuz his appearance in the Hobbit prolly shouldn't have been as forgettable as it ended up being.

[Khaza-R]

Hoping for good things from this show but anticipating it being underwhelming.

Perhaps I've become too jaded, but I find very likely that modern writers will forget to tell Tolkien's story and try to make it their own. I think the temptation of leaving their mark on something is greater than trying to be truthful the spirit of another author's work. But I suppose we will see.

[Xath]

House of the Dragon does have some injections of creativity that were not present in the book, but they're minor (so far).

The biggest offender in Rings of Power that I can see so far is they appear to be hyper-compressing the events of the second age.

Also completely changing Tar-Míriel's Tragedy and likely modernizing it aka removing the tragedy. Not really impressed with that casting either since the age is way off if they aren't making a massive change.

[tikcol]

So many inconsistencies and cheesy one liners. Wrap it all up through to the end with that loathsome song. Another Rings of Power trailer.

Someone please soothe Galadriel's storm.

Why is everyone saying that dude in the ancient grey bath towel is Gandalf? Did they also put him in middle-earth 1000 years early?

[Rennadrel]

What a nonsense argument lmao, so following your logic Sauron isn't an iconic villain because he only had 1 spoken line in the entire trilogy and barely any appearance.

Spoilers for Rings of Power: Legolas, played by Orlando Bloom, will still be more iconic than the entire cast of this show.

What was really disgusting was that article from The Guardian the other day trying to run defense for this shows cast by shitting on the trilogy cast. Like, no one cast for this show is someone of note. LOTR had two of the greats to ever grace the stage and screen in Sir Ian McKellen and Sir Christopher Lee, not to mention established great actors like Sean Astin, Sean Bean, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies and Hugo Weaving, all fantastic and award winning or award nominated actors and actresses well before the first film came out. And the films established the careers of people like Viggo Mortensen and Andy Serkis. That the media is so willingly attacking the people who helped make the franchise the household name that it has become in films, is pretty pedantic, just because the cast are all white people.

[Xath]

What was really disgusting was that article from The Guardian the other day trying to run defense for this shows cast by shitting on the trilogy cast. Like, no one cast for this show is someone of note. LOTR had two of the greats to ever grace the stage and screen in Sir Ian McKellen and Sir Christopher Lee, not to mention established great actors like Sean Astin, Sean Bean, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies and Hugo Weaving, all fantastic and award winning or award nominated actors and actresses well before the first film came out. And the films established the careers of people like Viggo Mortensen and Andy Serkis. That the media is so willingly attacking the people who helped make the franchise the household name that it has become in films, is pretty pedantic, just because the cast are all white people.

Not to mention Elijah Wood. There is a reason the guardian doesn't allow comments on their articles.

[Kumorii]

So many inconsistencies and cheesy one liners. Wrap it all up through to the end with that loathsome song. Another Rings of Power trailer.

Someone please soothe Galadriel's storm.

Why is everyone saying that dude in the ancient grey bath towel is Gandalf? Did they also put him in middle-earth 1000 years early?

Considering they condensed the lore so much and even lied about hobbits to put them in the show.
Why wouldn't they have Gandalf in it? It will attract some wows because we know gandalf!

[Zoibert the Bear]

The last trailer was absolute utter shit. What little hope I had for a decent show is gone.

What the fuck was that song?

[Rennadrel]

The last trailer was absolute utter shit. What little hope I had for a decent show is gone.

What the fuck was that song?

Howard Shore was probably too expensive for their fanfic. But that's not a surprise considering how much else looks cheap and lazy in the show.

[s_bushido]

Howard Shore was probably too expensive for their fanfic. But that's not a surprise considering how much else looks cheap and lazy in the show.

Awkward. I guess talking out of your ass on the internet is harder than it seems.

[Radeghost]

I just don't like the casting choices. I don't like elves and dwarves being mixed. Elves are always fairy in fantasy and have that sort of 'glow' attached to them in LotR. Dwarves should be pale considering where they live.
Middle-Earth isn't multicultural, it's not XXI century Earth, or New York, or 2022 London, it's fantasy with an established world consisting of various races and skin colors. Doesn't make sense to make it all mixed up. That's a weird American fetish to make everything look like their multicultural cauldron.

It's really tiring that by having an opinion like this makes you racist in eyes of some Amazon boot lickers. Okay, I get it, you just want everyone to mindlessly consume the media and be blind to casting choices. But we simply aren't. I don't remember boycotting Nick Fury being race swapped. I don't remember boycotting Morpheus in the Matrix being black, I don't remember boycotting Blade or anything else. If despite all of this, you think there's some racist agenda among the viewers, you're just blind.

In House of the Dragon I didn't really like that Velaryons are potrayed by black actors, because they should be looking just like Targaryens, but the character design is done so amazingly well I simply had no choice but to fall in love with that. Meanwhile in RoP the char design looks like they were taken straight from some ghetto

Awkward. I guess talking out of your ass on the internet is harder than it seems.

Only opening music tho

[Varodoc]

Also, elves in Middle Earth were always depicted with long, flowing hair, but for some reason this show decided that elves should have short hair. Elves with short hair are so fucking ugly and break a staple of Middle Earth: elves have long hair, period.

It's cringe how this show is trying so hard to be unique, special, and unprecedented.

[Adamas102]

Middle-Earth isn't multicultural, it's not XXI century Earth, or New York, or 2022 London, it's fantasy with an established world consisting of various races and skin colors. Doesn't make sense to make it all mixed up. That's a weird American fetish to make everything look like their multicultural cauldron.

The thing you people never seem to be able to grasp is that skin color and culture are two very different things. Dark skinned dwarves and light skinned dwarves are NOT multicultural. They’re just dwarves. Period.

The cast of the Peter Jackson movies was pretty multicultural. You had predominately American, British, Australian, and New Zealand actors all together playing humans, elves, and hobbits, but of course that didn’t seem to bother anyone. They weren’t playing American hobbits and English hobbits. They were just hobbits. In this show the cast is predominately British, but of course people with racialist views see dark skinned people as too different to fit in.

The issue is that you’re so conditioned to see skin color as such a differentiating factor when it’s really no different than something like hair color or eye color. In the real world all those variations happened the same way: with gene mutations that tweaked the amount of melanin production in the associated body part. The only reason skin color is seen differently in our world is because of thousands of years of people using it as a measure of superiority or inferiority. None of that has to apply to a fantasy world.

[Kumorii]

Also, elves in Middle Earth were always depicted with long, flowing hair, but for some reason this show decided that elves should have short hair. Elves with short hair are so fucking ugly and break a staple of Middle Earth: elves have long hair, period.

It's cringe how this show is trying so hard to be unique, special, and unprecedented.

The male elves... mostly Elrond and Celebrimbor look like they would be dwarves, just shaven. It's amazing how long straight hair is important to the elf look. People often think it's the ears, but those are often covered. The short hair really makes them not look like elves.

The show is trying to be different because of difference sakes, which is an odd take and is rarely important.

[Rennadrel]

The male elves... mostly Elrond and Celebrimbor look like they would be dwarves, just shaven. It's amazing how long straight hair is important to the elf look. People often think it's the ears, but those are often covered. The short hair really makes them not look like elves.

The show is trying to be different because of difference sakes, which is an odd take and is rarely important.

WoT did the same thing. Why the hell do characters have side cropped haircuts when they are traveling? If you are spending months or even years traveling, you aren't going to get a buzzcut at every single village to retain that look. Pretty sure by the end of the books, Rand had long hair, as did Mat and Perrin had grown out a massive beard and long curly hair on his head. Costumes and hairstyles definitely break immersion in adaptations, especially when there's an aesthetic already set.

[Gumble]

WoT did the same thing. Why the hell do characters have side cropped haircuts when they are traveling? If you are spending months or even years traveling, you aren't going to get a buzzcut at every single village to retain that look. Pretty sure by the end of the books, Rand had long hair, as did Mat and Perrin had grown out a massive beard and long curly hair on his head. Costumes and hairstyles definitely break immersion in adaptations, especially when there's an aesthetic already set.

Wait, do you mean to say that the author described in great detail what the people and places should look like and its very telling when the TV show version of it looks nothing like what the book says it looks like??????



Man... its almost like that argument has been going on for how long now?


I'll go watch Shogun, the only movie to really try to nail the book as close as it could.

[Triceron]

The issue is that you’re so conditioned to see skin color as such a differentiating factor when it’s really no different than something like hair color or eye color. In the real world all those variations happened the same way: with gene mutations that tweaked the amount of melanin production in the associated body part. The only reason skin color is seen differently in our world is because of thousands of years of people using it as a measure of superiority or inferiority. None of that has to apply to a fantasy world.

I mean you can explain it in this way but no one has to agree with your headcanon explanation on what is 'no different' or 'is different' when we're talking about a creative adaptation of fiction that has no credible explanation for why certain features deviate and others do not. You can't explain away why some Dwarves will look like real life African descent and others look real life European descent. You just can't. There is no explanation other than 'the creatives decided to adapt it this way'.

Just like you can't take a work like Hamilton and explain why the founding fathers are portrayed by people of different skin tones and cultures. No explanation is going to suffice because the play is built on intentional nonsense. It is a work of fiction that builds off its own rules, rules that have no logical reasoning or explanation behind them.


Same shit happened with depiction of Dragons in fantasy. Game of Thrones and Smaug are both depicted as 2-limbed 2 winged Wyverns, rather than the classical depiction of traditional Dragons that have 4 limbs and 2 wings. That's just how the creative adaptations decided to portray these 'Dragons'. No amount of explanation would make sense out of it, as the reasons for choosing to adapt them this way were purely a creative decision and not one that can be explained or rooted in anything other than simply being a creative liberty for an adaptation. These decisions aren't rooted in the world of the fiction itself, and they can not be compared to any real world logic. Trying to explain fiction with logical reasons just makes you sound pretentious.

The only reason there are Black Dwarves is because some creative or exec at Amazon decided it to be. And it was agreed upon that it should happen. There's no other explanation behind how or why it happens in Middle Earth, or for Rings of Power's story; it's just something people will accept as a normal part of this adaptation just like how Galadriel will be a sword-wielding badass when she isn't ever depicted this way in the original story. It's a creative liberty, that's it.

You're not actually going to convince anyone of your bullshit reasons. Two wrongs don't make a right.

[Adamas102]

I mean you can explain it in this way but no one has to agree with your headcanon explanation on what is 'no different' or 'is different' when we're talking about a creative adaptation of fiction that has no credible explanation for why certain features deviate and others do not. You can't explain away why some Dwarves will look like real life African descent and others look real life European descent. You just can't. There is no explanation other than 'the creatives decided to adapt it this way'.

It’s not about “headcanon explanation”, this is objective fact. That you, the poster I responded to, and several others in this thread simply lack the mental capacity to understand doesn’t change that.

There is no significant difference between people of European descent and people of African descent. The fact that you feel it necessary to divide them based on a genetic mutation that has only existed in Homo sapiens for about 4% of our existence is an issue with your lack of education and your narrow world view.

I know I’m not going to convince you because you’ve been so conditioned to see skin color as an intrinsic part of race and culture that you just aren’t mentally equipped to separate those ideas when considering a work of fiction that deals with fantastical creatures that aren’t even human. Exemplified by the fact that you seem to think there is no explanation for why dark skinned and light skinned dwarves can be of a single peoples. If you can wrap your mind around the idea of dwarves having different hair and eye color but can’t apply that to skin color then that’s just a mental deficiency on your part.

[Biomega]

You can't explain away why some Dwarves will look like real life African descent and others look real life European descent. You just can't.

Sure you can. "They were created that way". End of explanation. It's not like they're the product of evolution, or something - this is literally magic that brought them into being. Any particular reason why that magic would have to remain restricted to a single skin color?

Same shit happened with depiction of Dragons in fantasy. Game of Thrones and Smaug are both depicted as 2-limbed 2 winged Wyverns, rather than the classical depiction of traditional Dragons that have 4 limbs and 2 wings.

See, this is what's REALLY going on here.

YOU have a particular image of something fictional that you see as "classic" - and anything that deviates from that is, to you, not doing it right. But you have no justification for that standard. These are not real creatures. Their fictional depictions vary massively. You just picked one you like, and suddenly that's the 'right' one? By what possible justification, other than "this is just what I like", in which case cool, you go ahead liking what you like and leave the rest of us out of it.

Trying to explain fiction with logical reasons just makes you sound pretentious.

RIIIIIGHT, but using a lack of logical reasons to explain fiction, THAT is a valid argument and iron-clad basis for critique? Because that's what, you know, YOU ARE DOING when you're saying:

You can't explain away why some Dwarves will look like real life African descent and others look real life European descent. You just can't.

Gotta love the hypocritical double standards again, friendo.

[Triceron]

I know I’m not going to convince you because you’ve been so conditioned to see skin color as an intrinsic part of race and culture that you just aren’t mentally equipped to separate those ideas when considering a work of fiction. Exemplified by the fact that you seem to think there is no explanation for why dark skinned and light skinned dwarves can be of a single peoples. If you can wrap your mind around the idea of dwarves having different hair and eye color but can’t apply that to skin color then that’s just a mental deficiency on your part.

I'm not sure why you're targetting this answer to me at all since I've told you many times that I am fine with Rings of Power's adaptation, and many adaptations like it. Dr. Strange is a fine example, where both Baron Mordo and the Ancient One are depicted by people who do not resemble their original comic counterparts. Mordo is black, the Ancient One is now celtic. I have no problems with these changes, and the fact is, these changes do not have to be explained away in the adaptation. They merely are.

Yet my ability to see past skin color and simply accept the adaptation as is does not make it a norm. Not everyone is going to see it the way we do, and not everyone needs to. And no, it is not a problem if 'seeing skin color as a part of race and culture' because there isn't any one singular reasoning why people can choose to accept or not accept the changes. Every individual has their own reasoning, and by you even trying to generalize it down to a singular point is just as flawed as what you are arguing against - why diversity should be accepted in the first place. It's equally as flawed, because arguably the choice to be diverse shouldn't even be prioritized over keeping characters looking like their original depictions anyways. Just like Dr. Strange actually looking like his comic counterpart isn't some jab at diversity isn't some statement against excluding people of skin color in that particular role. It's simply a creative decision that for his role, they want to keep his character looking the part, while they wished to be creatively free to explore other looks for Mordo and the Ancient One. And they particularly wanted to avoid certain 'Oriental' stereotypes that existed back in the day. There aren't any in-universe explanations for the changes, these are all done externally, and need not be explained with any internal means to the logic of the fiction. I mean, they did end up waving it all away with the 'Multiverse' explanation, but that's besides the point as well.

"Exemplified by the fact that you seem to think there is no explanation for why dark skinned and light skinned dwarves can be of a single peoples."
Because there isn't one. And everyone will have their own subjective opinion about it. There's no singular defined way to interpret something that has no explanation, much like art. Some people will find certain art fascinating, others will find it disgusting. There's no way to define it in a singular way, even if intended by the Artist to be interpreted a certain way. That is the subjectivity of art, and it absolutely applies here. So while you have a full acceptance of skin color not being equated to race and culture, it is not relevant to how any one else chooses to interpret the existence of dark and light skinned dwarves. All you're doing is presenting your own take. If you're going beyond to try and tell people how they're somehow wrong for not being convinced, then you're just being pretentious.

I mean even in an argumentative sense, people generally aren't going to be convinced when they're told they're wrong. They tend to double down on their beliefs, and that's whats happening here considering you seem to go that extra step to imply that I'm one of the people who can't see beyond skin color even though I've not presented any opinion to you that implies it. I'm bringing to your attention that your explanation doesn't apply to everyone, nor should it apply to everyone. It will only and always apply to you. And it's fair for you to express your opinion, but it is unfair to imply that anyone who doesn't agree with your opinion is somehow interpreting the adaptation incorrectly.